Science Talk

Mr.SmartyPants · Guest

There are two ways to view the news that the House Judiciary Committee
will be holding a hearing on impeachable crimes by President George W.
Bush.

One view would be that this is all a charade and that after all, it
will not be a real impeachment hearing, but rather, simply a hearing
into the impeachable crimes of the Bush administration. As committee
Chair Rep. John Conyers (D-MI) put it, "We're not doing impeachment,
but he [Rep. Dennis Kucinich, who introduced 36 articles of
impeachment] can talk about it." Viewed that way, this is not such a
big deal. Rep. Kucinich gets to make his case that the president is
committing high crimes and misdemeanors and abuses of power and war
crimes, but then Congressional Democrats will continue to ignore all
the crimes as it has done since taking control of Congress in November
2006.

But a second way to view this is as a significant victory over the
quisling Congressional leadership, which has been ducking its
responsibility to defend the Constitution and to stand up for the rule
of law not just since November 2006, but since the inception of the
Bush/Cheney presidency.

I go for the second interpretation of events. It is clear, as was
beautifully laid out in an article published by Glenn Greenwald in
Salon magazine on July 15, that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and
the rest of the Democratic Party leadership both in Congress and in
the party organization, have been blocking any action on impeachment
for fear of having their own complicity in Bush's and Cheney's crimes
revealed. As Greenwald notes, the Washington Post has reported that
Pelosi, along with Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) and Rep. Jane Harman
(D-CA) were briefed on the administration's use of torture and not
only didn't object, but actively encouraged it. Rockefeller and
Harman, who at the time were minority leaders of the Senate and House
Intelligence Committees at the time, were also briefed about Bush's
order to the National Security Agency to conduct warrantless spying on
Americans. They didn't object or publicly expose this blatant
violation of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act and the Fourth
Amendment. And of course, many, if not most of the House and Senate
Democratic leadership as well as many of the rank-and-file members of
the party in both houses backed Bush's illegal war on Iraq, and his
USA PATRIOT Act.

No wonder Pelosi, even before winning control of Congress and being
elected Speaker, made it clear that under her "leadership" (if it can
be called that), impeachment of either Bush or Cheney would be "off
the table."

Looked at in this light, the fact that the House just voted 251-166 to
send Kucinich's 36 articles of impeachment to the Judiciary Committee
for a hearing, that Pelosi has had to buckle, and that Conyers has
agreed to hold even an "informational" hearing on impeachment, at
which Kucinich, Rep. Robert Wexler (D-FL), and other impeachment
advocates in the House will be able to present their case about the
president's crimes and abuses of power, constitutes a major victory of
principle over cowardice, of integrity over complicity, of the
Constitution over creeping fascism. (24 Republicans joined in voting
to send the articles to the committee.)

The fact is that public demands to hold this criminal administration
accountable for its crimes against the Constitution, the American
people and the global community, have been mounting and have reached a
point that the Democratic leadership, as terrified as it is of
impeachment and of the accompanying airing of its own complicity in
those crimes, has been forced to allow an airing of those crimes.

Now I don't expect Rep. Kucinich to bite the hand that feeds him. He
will not present the impeachment case in a way that criticizes those
leaders. Indeed, he has publicly thanked both Pelosi and Conyers for
allowing a hearing on impeachment. But it would be surprising if
Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee didn't make those points.
And that's good. Even if real impeachment hearings never actually come
to pass, we will be treated, finally, to a public airing of not just
the president's and vice president's crimes, but of the Democratic
Party leadership's participation in them.

The challenge now will be for the American people and for the
wide-spread and decentralized impeachment movement, and all
progressive, anti-war and civil liberties organizations, to press
Conyers and the Judiciary Committee to take it to the next level. If
Kucinich, Wexler and others do their job, and if we all demand that
the corporate media report on the hearings, Americans will finally
know the extent of this administration's crimes against the
Constitution, and the nature of the threat it poses to democracy and
freedom in America. At that point it will be time to demand that the
Judiciary Committee move to constitute itself as a formal Impeachment
Committee, with full power to subpoena and demand the appearance of
witnesses in a real impeachment hearing.

The hour is getting late, but there is still time to bring this
criminal administration to justice.

American voters may forgive leaders like Pelosi, Harman, Rockefeller
and others for failing to stand up to Bush and Cheney if their names
get dragged through the mud of an impeachment hearing, but the
American people will never forgive them or the rest of the Congress if
it allows these two men to leave office next January without tar and
feathers on their backs and a federal grand jury on their cases.

Call your representative today and every day (at 202-224-3121) and
demand that he or she co-sponsor some or all of Rep. Kucinich's 36
bills of impeachment, and join the call for real impeachment hearings.
Send them an email. And sign the petition calling for impeachment
hearings.

We are witnessing a backdown by the House leadership. It's time to
push harder. Impeachment hearings, and impeachment itself, can happen!

Dave Lindorff
--
http://gssites.com/bbg/index.html
--
If guns are out-lawed. Only the Out-laws & politicians will have guns.