|
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
tango Guest
|
Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 7:00 pm Post subject: Some questions on the additive subgroups of R |
|
|
(1) There is an F-sigma-delta additive subgroup of R namely G = {x in
R | limit (n! * pi * x) exists}.
Question: What about the existence of such groups at the higher F
levels?
(2) All analytic proper additive subgroups of R are meager. As a
consequence there is no proper additive subgroup of R which is G-
delta.
Question: What about higher G levels?
(3) Given an additive subgroup G of R there exists a unique additive
subgroup H of R such that G + H = R and G intersection H = {0}.
(4) If G and H are two analytic additive subgroups of R such that G +
H = R and G intersection H = {0} then G = R and H = {0} or vice versa.
Question: If G is analytic and non trivial ( != R or {0}) then H is
necessarily non analytic. If, further, G is countable (like Q or Z)
then H is not even measurable. What if G is uncountable? Is H
measurable in that case? Or does the answer depend on the specific G
we choose. What if G is the group in (1)?
(5) That measurable non analytic additive subgroups of R exist follows
easily by a cardinality argument. Is there a definable example?
Question: Is there an analytic additive subgroup of R which is not
Borel? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Guest
|
Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 8:19 am Post subject: Re: Some questions on the additive subgroups of R |
|
|
On Jul 13, 12:00 pm, tango <ashu1...@gmail.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
(2) All analytic proper additive subgroups of R are meager. As a
consequence there is no proper additive subgroup of R which is G-
delta.
Question: What about higher G levels?
|
What does analytic mean? Wikipedia's definition wants an analytic
subgroup to be connected, which is going to limit the possibilities a
lot here . And for your second statement, what rules out Z?
Interesting questions, I have to think about them some more. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Guest
|
Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 10:12 am Post subject: Re: Some questions on the additive subgroups of R |
|
|
On Jul 14, 1:19 pm, fjbl...@yahoo.com wrote:
| Quote: |
On Jul 13, 12:00 pm, tango <ashu1...@gmail.com> wrote:
(2) All analytic proper additive subgroups of R are meager. As a
consequence there is no proper additive subgroup of R which is G-
delta.
Question: What about higher G levels?
What does analytic mean? Wikipedia's definition wants an analytic
subgroup to be connected, which is going to limit the possibilities a
lot here . And for your second statement, what rules out Z?
Interesting questions, I have to think about them some more.
|
He means g-delta sets that are not closed. If a g-delta set is not
closed, it has a cauchy sequence in it. This implies that the group is
dense. A dense g-delta set is co-meager/residual. g-delta sets, being
analytic(here meaning the continuous image of borel sets), satisfy the
baire property, hence cant be a proper subgroup. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|