|
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Dennis Guest
|
Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 8:37 pm Post subject: B, TMN ain't no artful dodger |
|
|
FROM CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER
HEAD: Obama Flips and Flops
WASHINGTON -- You'll notice Barack Obama is now wearing a flag pin. Again.
During the primary campaign, he refused to, explaining that he'd worn one
after 9/11 but then stopped because it "became a substitute for, I think,
true patriotism."
So why is he back to sporting pseudo-patriotism on his chest? Need you ask?
The primaries are over. While seducing the hard-core MoveOn Democrats that
delivered him the caucuses -- hence, the Democratic nomination -- Obama not
only disdained the pin. He disparaged it. Now that he's running in a general
election against John McCain, and in dire need of the gun-and-God-clinging
working-class votes he could not win against Hillary Clinton, the pin is
back. His country 'tis of thee.
In last week's column, I thought I had thoroughly chronicled Obama's brazen
reversals of position and abandonment of principles -- on public financing
of campaigns, on NAFTA, on telecom immunity for post-9/11 wiretaps, on
unconditional talks with Ahmadinejad -- as he moved to the center for the
general election campaign. I misjudged him. He was just getting started.
Last week, when the Supreme Court declared unconstitutional the District of
Columbia's ban on handguns, Obama immediately declared that he agreed with
the decision. This is after his campaign explicitly told the Chicago Tribune
last November that he believes the D.C. gun ban is constitutional.
Obama spokesman Bill Burton explains the inexplicable by calling the
November -- i.e., the primary season -- statement "inartful." Which suggests
a first entry in the Obamaworld dictionary -- "Inartful: clear and
straightforward, lacking the artistry that allows subsequent self-refutation
and denial."
Obama's seasonally adjusted principles are beginning to pile up: NAFTA,
campaign finance reform, warrantless wiretaps, flag pins, gun control.
What's left?
Iraq. The reversal is coming, and soon.
Two weeks ago, I predicted that by Election Day Obama will have erased all
meaningful differences with McCain on withdrawal from Iraq. I underestimated
Obama's cynicism. He will make the move much sooner. He will use his
upcoming Iraq trip to acknowledge the remarkable improvements on the ground
and to abandon his primary season commitment to a fixed 16-month timetable
for removal of all combat troops.
The shift has already begun. Thursday, he said that his "original position"
on withdrawal has always been that "we've got to make sure that our troops
are safe and that Iraq is stable." And that "when I go to Iraq ... I'll have
more information and will continue to refine my policies."
The flip is almost complete. All that's left to say is that the 16-month
time frame remains his goal but he will, of course, take into account the
situation on the ground and the recommendation of his generals in
determining the ultimate pace of the withdrawal.
Done. And with that, the Obama of the primaries, the Obama with last year's
most liberal voting record in the Senate, will have disappeared into the
collective memory hole.
Obama's strategy is obvious. The country is in a deep malaise and eager for
change. He and his party already have the advantage on economic and domestic
issues. Obama, therefore, aims to clear the deck by moving rapidly to the
center in those areas where he and his party are weakest, namely national
security and the broader cultural issues. With these -- and most importantly
his war-losing Iraq policy -- out of the way, the election will be decided
on charisma and persona. In this corner: the young sleek cool hip elegant
challenger. In the other corner: the old guy. No contest.
After all, that's how he beat Hillary. She originally ran as a centrist,
expecting her nomination to be a mere coronation. At the first sign of
serious opposition, however, she panicked and veered left. It was a fatal
error. It eliminated all significant ideological and policy differences with
Obama -- her desperate attempts to magnify their minuscule disagreement on
health care universality became almost comical -- making the contest
entirely one of personality. No contest.
As Obama assiduously obliterates all differences with McCain on national
security and social issues, he remains rightly confident that Bush fatigue,
the lousy economy and his own charisma -- he is easily the most dazzling
political personality since John Kennedy -- will carry him to the White
House.
Of course, once he gets there he will have to figure out what he really
believes. The conventional liberal/populist stuff he campaigned on during
the primaries? Or the reversals he is so artfully offering up now?
I have no idea. Do you? Does he?
**********
Do we really want Barack, The Magic Negro as President when he dodges so
inartfully?
Dionysus |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Lamont Cranston Guest
|
Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 12:15 am Post subject: Re: B, TMN ain't no artful dodger |
|
|
Dennis wrote:
| Quote: |
FROM CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER
HEAD: Obama Flips and Flops
WASHINGTON -- You'll notice Barack Obama is now wearing a
flag pin.
Again. During the primary campaign, he refused to,
explaining that
he'd worn one after 9/11 but then stopped because it
"became a
substitute for, I think, true patriotism."
So why is he back to sporting pseudo-patriotism on his
chest? Need
you ask? The primaries are over. While seducing the
hard-core MoveOn
Democrats that delivered him the caucuses -- hence, the
Democratic
nomination -- Obama not only disdained the pin. He
disparaged it. Now
that he's running in a general election against John
McCain, and in
dire need of the gun-and-God-clinging working-class votes
he could
not win against Hillary Clinton, the pin is back. His
country 'tis of
thee.
In last week's column, I thought I had thoroughly
chronicled Obama's
brazen reversals of position and abandonment of
principles -- on
public financing of campaigns, on NAFTA, on telecom
immunity for
post-9/11 wiretaps, on unconditional talks with
Ahmadinejad -- as he
moved to the center for the general election campaign. I
misjudged
him. He was just getting started.
Last week, when the Supreme Court declared
unconstitutional the
District of Columbia's ban on handguns, Obama immediately
declared
that he agreed with the decision. This is after his
campaign
explicitly told the Chicago Tribune last November that he
believes
the D.C. gun ban is constitutional.
Obama spokesman Bill Burton explains the inexplicable by
calling the
November -- i.e., the primary season -- statement
"inartful." Which
suggests a first entry in the Obamaworld dictionary --
"Inartful:
clear and straightforward, lacking the artistry that
allows
subsequent self-refutation and denial."
Obama's seasonally adjusted principles are beginning to
pile up:
NAFTA, campaign finance reform, warrantless wiretaps, flag
pins, gun
control. What's left?
Iraq. The reversal is coming, and soon.
Two weeks ago, I predicted that by Election Day Obama will
have
erased all meaningful differences with McCain on
withdrawal from
Iraq. I underestimated Obama's cynicism. He will make the
move much
sooner. He will use his upcoming Iraq trip to acknowledge
the
remarkable improvements on the ground and to abandon his
primary
season commitment to a fixed 16-month timetable for
removal of all
combat troops.
The shift has already begun. Thursday, he said that his
"original
position" on withdrawal has always been that "we've got to
make sure
that our troops are safe and that Iraq is stable." And
that "when I
go to Iraq ... I'll have more information and will
continue to refine
my policies."
The flip is almost complete. All that's left to say is
that the
16-month time frame remains his goal but he will, of
course, take
into account the situation on the ground and the
recommendation of
his generals in determining the ultimate pace of the
withdrawal.
Done. And with that, the Obama of the primaries, the Obama
with last
year's most liberal voting record in the Senate, will have
disappeared into the collective memory hole.
Obama's strategy is obvious. The country is in a deep
malaise and
eager for change. He and his party already have the
advantage on
economic and domestic issues. Obama, therefore, aims to
clear the
deck by moving rapidly to the center in those areas where
he and his
party are weakest, namely national security and the
broader cultural
issues. With these -- and most importantly his war-losing
Iraq policy
-- out of the way, the election will be decided on
charisma and
persona. In this corner: the young sleek cool hip elegant
challenger.
In the other corner: the old guy. No contest.
After all, that's how he beat Hillary. She originally ran
as a
centrist, expecting her nomination to be a mere
coronation. At the
first sign of serious opposition, however, she panicked
and veered
left. It was a fatal error. It eliminated all significant
ideological
and policy differences with Obama -- her desperate
attempts to
magnify their minuscule disagreement on health care
universality
became almost comical -- making the contest entirely one
of
personality. No contest.
As Obama assiduously obliterates all differences with
McCain on
national security and social issues, he remains rightly
confident
that Bush fatigue, the lousy economy and his own
charisma -- he is
easily the most dazzling political personality since John
Kennedy --
will carry him to the White House.
Of course, once he gets there he will have to figure out
what he
really believes. The conventional liberal/populist stuff
he
campaigned on during the primaries? Or the reversals he is
so
artfully offering up now?
I have no idea. Do you? Does he?
**********
Do we really want Barack, The Magic Negro as President
when he dodges
so inartfully?
|
Nobody cares what you want. Practice saying "President
Obama."
Dionysus = Dumbass |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
robert bowman Guest
|
Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 9:06 am Post subject: Re: B, TMN ain't no artful dodger |
|
|
On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 11:37:31 -0400, Dennis wrote:
| Quote: |
Do we really want Barack, The Magic Negro as President when he dodges so
inartfully?
|
Neither candidate is very artful. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|