Science Talk
Science Talk
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Forums
Science Forums
Biology
Math
Astronomy
Physics
Technology
Chemistry
Social Sciences
History
Psychology
Philosophy
Sociology
Linguistics
Religious Studies
Economics
Man Woman Ethno
Ask an Expert
World Records
Society Issues
Education
People
Alternative Science
Global warming 12,000 BC.
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Science Talk Forum Index -> Astrology
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Ken S. Tucker
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 5:10 pm    Post subject: Re: Global warming 12,000 BC. Reply with quote

On Jul 11, 4:11 pm, david.willi...@bayman.org (David Williams) wrote:
Quote:
On 07/11/2008 6:24 AM, dynam...@vianet.on.ca wrote to All:

-> On Jul 10, 2:46 pm, david.willi...@bayman.org (David Williams) wrote:
-> > On 07/09/2008 12:24 PM, dynam...@vianet.on.ca wrote to All:
-
-> > -> What we need to do is dig up a dead Viking off E-island.
-> > -> But according to DOW, that could have been carried from
-> > -> NFLD, so there is no point in introducing evidence and
-> > -> confusing people whose minds are made up.
-> > -> Been there, tried it.
-> > -> Ken
-> > -> "you can't teach pigs to sing"
-
-> > Itīs wonderful how Ken invents other peopleīs reactions to events which
-> > have not happened and, in all probability, never will happen.
-> > He lives in a dream world.
-
-> Dave if you have a "bias" to green technology,
-> financially or otherwise then your objectivity is
-> excluded, do you?
-> If so you want to believe any pop-TEEVEE
-> show that favors your investment above actual
-> science that you conviently marginalize, don't
-> be ashamed that's a typical human property Smile.
-
-> I happen to hold investments in Green technology,
-> however that has nothing to do with Global warming,
-> so I'm unbiased.
-> Ken

What pop-TV show are you imagining?

Characteristic of historical (hysterical) denial of
facts, such as the extremely rapid recession of
glaciers and the desertification of the Sahara
that is a MAJOR climatic variation that did in
fact occur. Can you explain that?

Quote:
I have some investments in nuclear technology. I that green or not?
dow
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Ken S. Tucker
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 10:40 pm    Post subject: Re: Global warming 12,000 BC. Reply with quote

On Jul 13, 12:20 pm, david.willi...@bayman.org (David Williams) wrote:
Quote:
dynam...@vianet.on.ca wrote to All:

-> > -> Dave if you have a "bias" to green technology,
-> > -> financially or otherwise then your objectivity is
-> > -> excluded, do you?
-> > -> If so you want to believe any pop-TEEVEE
-> > -> show that favors your investment above actual
-> > -> science that you conviently marginalize, don't
-> > -> be ashamed that's a typical human property Smile.
-> > -
-> > -> I happen to hold investments in Green technology,
-> > -> however that has nothing to do with Global warming,
-> > -> so I'm unbiased.
-> > -> Ken
-
-> > What pop-TV show are you imagining?
-
-> Characteristic of historical (hysterical) denial of
-> facts, such as the extremely rapid recession of
-> glaciers and the desertification of the Sahara
-> that is a MAJOR climatic variation that did in
-> fact occur. Can you explain that?

Please clarify the non sequitur.

Exactly, you CANT HANDLE THE TRUTH.
Ken
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


David Williams
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 12:20 am    Post subject: Re: Global warming 12,000 BC. Reply with quote

dynamics@vianet.on.ca wrote to All:

-> > -> Dave if you have a "bias" to green technology,
-> > -> financially or otherwise then your objectivity is
-> > -> excluded, do you?
-> > -> If so you want to believe any pop-TEEVEE
-> > -> show that favors your investment above actual
-> > -> science that you conviently marginalize, don't
-> > -> be ashamed that's a typical human property Smile.
-> > ->
-> > -> I happen to hold investments in Green technology,
-> > -> however that has nothing to do with Global warming,
-> > -> so I'm unbiased.
-> > -> Ken
-> >
-> > What pop-TV show are you imagining?
->
-> Characteristic of historical (hysterical) denial of
-> facts, such as the extremely rapid recession of
-> glaciers and the desertification of the Sahara
-> that is a MAJOR climatic variation that did in
-> fact occur. Can you explain that?

Please clarify the non sequitur.

Glacial recession and expansion of deserts is still occurring, faster than at any
other time in recent millennia. You shouldnīt refer to them in the past tense.

dow
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


David Williams
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 4:01 pm    Post subject: Re: Global warming 12,000 BC. Reply with quote

On 07/13/2008 5:40 PM, dynamics@vianet.on.ca wrote to All:

-> > -> Characteristic of historical (hysterical) denial of
-> > -> facts, such as the extremely rapid recession of
-> > -> glaciers and the desertification of the Sahara
-> > -> that is a MAJOR climatic variation that did in
-> > -> fact occur. Can you explain that?
-> >
-> > Please clarify the non sequitur.
->
-> Exactly, you CANT HANDLE THE TRUTH.
-> Ken

I wonder how many people here, besides myself, are laughing at you.

dow
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Ken S. Tucker
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 8:22 pm    Post subject: Re: Global warming 12,000 BC. Reply with quote

On Jul 14, 4:01 am, david.willi...@bayman.org (David Williams) wrote:
Quote:
On 07/13/2008 5:40 PM, dynam...@vianet.on.ca wrote to All:

-> > -> Characteristic of historical (hysterical) denial of
-> > -> facts, such as the extremely rapid recession of
-> > -> glaciers and the desertification of the Sahara
-> > -> that is a MAJOR climatic variation that did in
-> > -> fact occur. Can you explain that?
-
-> > Please clarify the non sequitur.
-
-> Exactly, you CANT HANDLE THE TRUTH.
-> Ken

I wonder how many people here, besides myself, are laughing at you.
dow

What is the name of the thread?
We've read some extraordinarily interesting theories
that look very plausible that we are studying and in
discussions with objective researchers who take the
subject seriously. It's much more complex than a TV
show can teach you.
Ken

PS:We got your email, thanks, about travelling.
(our email is weird, doesn't always work).
We travel quite alot, but we usually don't talk
about it unless it's of direct interest. For example
when we were invited to NASA's MSFC for discussions
on general relativity and then to the KSFC for the
shuttle launch we informed you of that but you were
kinda bored.....
L8R
Ken & Lynne
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Science Talk Forum Index -> Astrology All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
Page 3 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Australian Debt Consolidation Experts
medical insurance
Wedding Ring
Portali e siti di annunci di escort, accompagnatrici e massaggiatrici
Swingers Contacts Canada
Business
car insurance policy
Make Your Own Website
Cheap International Calls
Long island Cleaning service
mold killer
UK Swingers Genuine Contacts Site
floor machines
Hoover Vacuum Bags


Board Security

192 Attacks blocked

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group