Science Talk
Science Talk
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Forums
Science Forums
Biology
Math
Astronomy
Physics
Technology
Chemistry
Social Sciences
History
Psychology
Philosophy
Sociology
Linguistics
Religious Studies
Economics
Man Woman Ethno
Ask an Expert
World Records
Society Issues
Education
People
Alternative Science
...First Microscopic Images of Soil from another World...and
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Science Talk Forum Index -> Astrology
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
jonathan
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 5:35 am    Post subject: ...First Microscopic Images of Soil from another World...and Reply with quote

From the Mars Phoenix lander of course

Lander Homepages
http://phoenix.lpl.arizona.edu/
http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/phoenix/main.php


In these two microscopic images, field of view about 2 to 3mm, with all
the dust, there's some green crystals (olivine?), and a square
red crystal (iron?).
http://phoenix.lpl.arizona.edu/images.php?gID=4859&cID=69

And in this picture, in the upper left of the sticky substrate, is a
brownish oval crystal? Coated with numerous tiny crystals and
looking like a rather festive Christmas tree. Any guesses as to
what these crystals are?
http://phoenix.lpl.arizona.edu/images.php?gID=4869&cID=69

White material in trench, ice or salts?
NASA seems to think it's the edge of a slab they trenched into, but
hasn't identified the white material yet.
http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/phoenix/images.php?fileID=13919

And another open question is this poor resolution image of a rock
directly underneath the lander. It looks like a slab of ice where
water has bored a couple of holes. Is it ice or rock?
(ignore stray Martian stainless spring-like fossil lower right~)
http://phoenix.lpl.arizona.edu/images.php?gID=0&cID=74


Whatd'ya think?


What I know about geology can fit on a post card, yet I find
this stuff very fascinating. Who wouldn't?


s
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Guest






PostPosted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 8:51 am    Post subject: Re: ...First Microscopic Images of Soil from another World.. Reply with quote

On 17 juin, 02:35, "jonathan" <H...@write.instead.net> wrote:
Quote:
From the Mars Phoenix lander of course

Lander Homepageshttp://phoenix.lpl.arizona.edu/http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/phoenix/main.php

In these two microscopic images, field of view about 2 to 3mm, with all
the dust, there's some green crystals (olivine?), and a square
red crystal (iron?).http://phoenix.lpl.arizona.edu/images.php?gID=4859&cID=69

And in this picture, in the upper left of the sticky substrate, is a
brownish oval crystal? Coated with numerous tiny crystals and
looking like a rather festive Christmas tree. Any guesses as to
what these crystals are?http://phoenix.lpl.arizona.edu/images.php?gID=4869&cID=69

White material in trench, ice or salts?
NASA seems to think it's the edge of a slab they trenched into, but
hasn't identified the white material yet.http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/phoenix/images.php?fileID=13919

And another open question is this poor resolution image of a rock
directly underneath the lander. It looks like a slab of ice where
water has bored a couple of holes.  Is it ice or rock?
(ignore stray Martian stainless spring-like fossil lower right~)http://phoenix.lpl.arizona.edu/images.php?gID=0&cID=74

Whatd'ya think?

What I know about geology can fit on a post card, yet I find
this stuff very fascinating. Who wouldn't?

s
Mars rock formations are exactly the one who find down here in Earth

as Mars is Earth elder sister, just as Venus is Earth younger sister !
One day the Earth will be on Mars orbit just like Mars will have
drifted further to the Belt of Aeroliths position ...
... and life on Earth will have become extinct has Mars life has
become extinct !!!

and thanks to Global Warming that very process of drift on the
Ecliptic is accelerating indeed

Not cyclic but irreversible situation !

Jean-Paul Turcaud
Australia Mining Pioneer
Discoverer of Telfer, Nifty & Kintyre Mines in the Great Sandy Desert
Exploration Geologist & Offshore Consultant
Bus ph + 33 6 50 17 14 64
Founder of the True Geology

~ Ignorance is the Cosmic Sin, the One never Forgiven ~
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


The Man From Havana
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 9:19 am    Post subject: Re: ...First Microscopic Images of Soil from another World.. Reply with quote

On Jun 17, 6:51 pm, sir.jean-paul.turc...@neuf.fr wrote:
Quote:
On 17 juin, 02:35, "jonathan" <H...@write.instead.net> wrote:



From the Mars Phoenix lander of course




----------------Give yourself an enema Le Turd----------------------
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


The Man From Havana
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 9:24 am    Post subject: Re: ...First Microscopic Images of Soil from another World.. Reply with quote

On Jun 17, 7:19 pm, The Man From Havana <johnvonl...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Quote:
On Jun 17, 6:51 pm, sir.jean-paul.turc...@neuf.fr wrote:

On 17 juin, 02:35, "jonathan" <H...@write.instead.net> wrote:

From the Mars Phoenix lander of course

----------------Give yourself an enema Le Turd----------------------

YEP WELL DONE !
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


George
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 8:18 am    Post subject: Re: ...First Microscopic Images of Soil from another World.. Reply with quote

"jonathan" <Home@write.instead.net> wrote in message
news:vED5k.9126$bh5.4011@bignews4.bellsouth.net...

<snip>

Quote:
And another open question is this poor resolution image of a rock
directly underneath the lander. It looks like a slab of ice where
water has bored a couple of holes. Is it ice or rock?
(ignore stray Martian stainless spring-like fossil lower right~)
http://phoenix.lpl.arizona.edu/images.php?gID=0&cID=74


Whatd'ya think?

NASA said today that the hole is directly beneath a thruster, and so is
probably the result of a thruster firing when the craft landed. They also
said that that might indicate that the slab is ice.

George
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Pat Flannery
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 11:00 am    Post subject: Re: ...First Microscopic Images of Soil from another World.. Reply with quote

V for Vendicar wrote:
Quote:
"Pat Flannery" <flanner@daktel.com> wrote

Or dry ice...


Flat ice... Under a rocket thruster?

It would have sublimed away a long time ago.


We talking dry ice or water ice here?
Temperature, heating by solar illumination, atmospheric pressure, and
the insulating properties of the soil over the ice all change its
ability to sublimate into the atmosphere.
Personally, I think there's nothing but CO2 "dry ice" there.
But, who knows?

Quote:
The atmospheric pressure 2cm under a pile of sand is not practically
different than the atmospheric pressure at the surface.


What interests me is the NASA "liquid water" ejections on the side of
the crater photos from around a year back.
At Mars surface temperatures, the triple point of CO2 needs only
pressure to allow CO2 to exist in a liquid form.. and those "water
ejections" came out of the side of the crater from around a hundred feet
or more depth - never on the surface.

Pat
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


V for Vendicar
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 11:00 am    Post subject: Re: ...First Microscopic Images of Soil from another World.. Reply with quote

"Pat Flannery" <flanner@daktel.com> wrote
Quote:
Or dry ice...

Flat ice... Under a rocket thruster?

It would have sublimed away a long time ago.

"Pat Flannery" <flanner@daktel.com> wrote
Quote:
Ideally, the soil sample goes into the test chamber within a few minutes
after the arm scoops it up, to preserve any volatile ices in it.

The atmospheric pressure 2cm under a pile of sand is not practically
different than the atmospheric pressure at the surface.

Salt.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Pat Flannery
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 11:00 am    Post subject: Re: ...First Microscopic Images of Soil from another World.. Reply with quote

George wrote:
Quote:

NASA said today that the hole is directly beneath a thruster, and so is
probably the result of a thruster firing when the craft landed. They also
said that that might indicate that the slab is ice.


Or dry ice... I took a Bernz-O-Matic torch to water ice with very poor
results indeed, and the total time of the landing engine's impinging on
the Martian surface would be be very low, measured in a few seconds at most.
It really didn't help that it took so long to get the soil sample into
the test chamber - any CO2 or water ice in it might have sublimated into
the atmosphere between the time it was scooped up and the time it
finally got into the test chamber days later.
Ideally, the soil sample goes into the test chamber within a few minutes
after the arm scoops it up, to preserve any volatile ices in it.
I still have grave doubts about it finding water ice, but would happily
admit to being wrong about this if firm proof of water ice is found,
because of the profound implications of such a finding.

Pat
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


V for Vendicar
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 11:00 am    Post subject: Re: ...First Microscopic Images of Soil from another World.. Reply with quote

"jonathan" <Home@write.instead.net> wrote
Quote:
Whatd'ya think?

Salt.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


jonathan
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Jun 19, 2008 5:36 am    Post subject: Re: ...First Microscopic Images....It's gotta be Water-Ice! Reply with quote

"Pat Flannery" <flanner@daktel.com> wrote in message
news:28-dnQeJW7zSXMXVnZ2dnUVZ_rmdnZ2d@posted.northdakotatelephone...
Quote:


George wrote:

NASA said today that the hole is directly beneath a thruster, and so is
probably the result of a thruster firing when the craft landed. They also
said that that might indicate that the slab is ice.


Or dry ice... I took a Bernz-O-Matic torch to water ice with very poor results
indeed, and the total time of the landing engine's impinging on the Martian
surface would be be very low, measured in a few seconds at most.


I was wondering about that. But I think they're going to find the white
slabs and material in the trench is indeed water ice. That area has
observations from the Odyssey orbiter showing from 30% to 60%
water ice in the first meter or so. Even in the first few inches.

The poles are all covered with Co2 ice, but on the fringes surrounding
the poles is a region of water ice. Which is where they landed.
So I think that's a slab of water ice with naturally bored holes.

The data supports a ...currently active...water cycle on Mars in
these areas. Which is what life needs. I believe the best conditions
for life would be where water transitions from water-ice-vapor
and back again. Not so much in any one of those realms, but where
the transition takes place. This landing site is looking better every
day. I'm getting psyched up!

Water Mass Map from Neutron Spectrometer
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/phoenix/multimedia/6433-20080513.html


ASU scientist finds Martian ice is patchy and variable

"The fact that ice is present near the depth of stability in the current
Martian climate shows that the ground ice is responding to
climate cycles," he says." "This implies that water ice in the ground
can swap places with water vapor in the atmosphere as the climate
changes, he says, adding:
"The THEMIS measurements support an active water cycle on Mars,
such as other research has predicted."
http://asunews.asu.edu/stories/200705/20070503_marsice.htm


Quote:
It really didn't help that it took so long to get the soil sample into the
test chamber - any CO2 or water ice in it might have sublimated into the
atmosphere between the time it was scooped up and the time it finally got into
the test chamber days later.
Ideally, the soil sample goes into the test chamber within a few minutes after
the arm scoops it up, to preserve any volatile ices in it.
I still have grave doubts about it finding water ice, but would happily admit
to being wrong about this if firm proof of water ice is found, because of the
profound implications of such a finding.


Here's a really nice paper on the presumed history of water ice at
the Phoenix Mars landing site. Aptly named....

THE HISTORY OF ICE AT THE PHOENIX MARS
LANDING SITE
Lunar and Planetary Science XXXIX (2008) 1479

What's interesting is this statement below is about the age
of the ice.

"It is not reliably known when the last massive ice sheet
formed [14, 5, 6] or how humidity varies with time. In total,
four climate scenarios are simulated: Precipitation 5640 ka
ago and 632 ka ago (the most recent obliquity maximum with
~35 d) with constant humidity and time ­varying humidity.
Figure 3 shows preliminary model results for the vertical
ice profile, if the last ice sheet formed 632 ka ago. The massive
ice sheet is much closer to the surface than it would be had
it last formed millions of years ago."
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2008/pdf/1479.pdf


Not so old as we've been led to believe all this time.
Nearer the surface means younger. And if that is ice
they've photographed so close to the surface....it must
be very young. Since the soil is thought to build from
dust accumulation from the air.

Since other data indicates Mars is just now exiting
an ice age and warming, it may be the last warm
period with liquid water near the surface could have
have been that figure of 630,000 years ago.

Not billions, maybe not even millions of years ago.
And another thing, it's pretty clear from the much
greater lag deposit at the Phoenix site that it's a much
older surface than at Meridiani, which is pure soil
with hardly a rock to be found. That implies water
ice could have been at Meridiani even more recently.

I'm going with ...all the white stuff... is water ice.





Quote:

Pat
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


windbag
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 4:20 am    Post subject: Re: ...First Microscopic Images....It's gotta be Water-Ice! Reply with quote

jonathan wrote:
Quote:
"Pat Flannery" <flanner@daktel.com> wrote in message
news:28-dnQeJW7zSXMXVnZ2dnUVZ_rmdnZ2d@posted.northdakotatelephone...


George wrote:

NASA said today that the hole is directly beneath a thruster, and so is
probably the result of a thruster firing when the craft landed. They also
said that that might indicate that the slab is ice.


Or dry ice... I took a Bernz-O-Matic torch to water ice with very poor results
indeed, and the total time of the landing engine's impinging on the Martian
surface would be be very low, measured in a few seconds at most.


I was wondering about that. But I think they're going to find the white
slabs and material in the trench is indeed water ice. That area has
observations from the Odyssey orbiter showing from 30% to 60%
water ice in the first meter or so. Even in the first few inches.

The poles are all covered with Co2 ice, but on the fringes surrounding
the poles is a region of water ice. Which is where they landed.
So I think that's a slab of water ice with naturally bored holes.

The data supports a ...currently active...water cycle on Mars in
these areas. Which is what life needs. I believe the best conditions
for life would be where water transitions from water-ice-vapor
and back again. Not so much in any one of those realms, but where
the transition takes place. This landing site is looking better every
day. I'm getting psyched up!

Water Mass Map from Neutron Spectrometer
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/phoenix/multimedia/6433-20080513.html


ASU scientist finds Martian ice is patchy and variable

"The fact that ice is present near the depth of stability in the current
Martian climate shows that the ground ice is responding to
climate cycles," he says." "This implies that water ice in the ground
can swap places with water vapor in the atmosphere as the climate
changes, he says, adding:
"The THEMIS measurements support an active water cycle on Mars,
such as other research has predicted."
http://asunews.asu.edu/stories/200705/20070503_marsice.htm


It really didn't help that it took so long to get the soil sample into the
test chamber - any CO2 or water ice in it might have sublimated into the
atmosphere between the time it was scooped up and the time it finally got into
the test chamber days later.
Ideally, the soil sample goes into the test chamber within a few minutes after
the arm scoops it up, to preserve any volatile ices in it.
I still have grave doubts about it finding water ice, but would happily admit
to being wrong about this if firm proof of water ice is found, because of the
profound implications of such a finding.


Here's a really nice paper on the presumed history of water ice at
the Phoenix Mars landing site. Aptly named....

THE HISTORY OF ICE AT THE PHOENIX MARS
LANDING SITE
Lunar and Planetary Science XXXIX (2008) 1479

What's interesting is this statement below is about the age
of the ice.

"It is not reliably known when the last massive ice sheet
formed [14, 5, 6] or how humidity varies with time. In total,
four climate scenarios are simulated: Precipitation 5640 ka
ago and 632 ka ago (the most recent obliquity maximum with
~35 d) with constant humidity and time �varying humidity.
Figure 3 shows preliminary model results for the vertical
ice profile, if the last ice sheet formed 632 ka ago. The massive
ice sheet is much closer to the surface than it would be had
it last formed millions of years ago."
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2008/pdf/1479.pdf


Not so old as we've been led to believe all this time.
Nearer the surface means younger. And if that is ice
they've photographed so close to the surface....it must
be very young. Since the soil is thought to build from
dust accumulation from the air.

Since other data indicates Mars is just now exiting
an ice age and warming, it may be the last warm
period with liquid water near the surface could have
have been that figure of 630,000 years ago.

Not billions, maybe not even millions of years ago.
And another thing, it's pretty clear from the much
greater lag deposit at the Phoenix site that it's a much
older surface than at Meridiani, which is pure soil
with hardly a rock to be found. That implies water
ice could have been at Meridiani even more recently.

I'm going with ...all the white stuff... is water ice.






Pat


Under what conditions does carbonated salt water stay frozen?

Also, frozen hydrogen peroxide is not entirely impossible.

kk
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


windbag
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 4:22 am    Post subject: Re: ...First Microscopic Images....It's gotta be Water-Ice! Reply with quote

jonathan wrote:
Quote:
"Pat Flannery" <flanner@daktel.com> wrote in message
news:28-dnQeJW7zSXMXVnZ2dnUVZ_rmdnZ2d@posted.northdakotatelephone...


George wrote:

NASA said today that the hole is directly beneath a thruster, and so is
probably the result of a thruster firing when the craft landed. They also
said that that might indicate that the slab is ice.


Or dry ice... I took a Bernz-O-Matic torch to water ice with very poor results
indeed, and the total time of the landing engine's impinging on the Martian
surface would be be very low, measured in a few seconds at most.


I was wondering about that. But I think they're going to find the white
slabs and material in the trench is indeed water ice. That area has
observations from the Odyssey orbiter showing from 30% to 60%
water ice in the first meter or so. Even in the first few inches.

The poles are all covered with Co2 ice, but on the fringes surrounding
the poles is a region of water ice. Which is where they landed.
So I think that's a slab of water ice with naturally bored holes.

The data supports a ...currently active...water cycle on Mars in
these areas. Which is what life needs. I believe the best conditions
for life would be where water transitions from water-ice-vapor
and back again. Not so much in any one of those realms, but where
the transition takes place. This landing site is looking better every
day. I'm getting psyched up!

Water Mass Map from Neutron Spectrometer
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/phoenix/multimedia/6433-20080513.html


ASU scientist finds Martian ice is patchy and variable

"The fact that ice is present near the depth of stability in the current
Martian climate shows that the ground ice is responding to
climate cycles," he says." "This implies that water ice in the ground
can swap places with water vapor in the atmosphere as the climate
changes, he says, adding:
"The THEMIS measurements support an active water cycle on Mars,
such as other research has predicted."
http://asunews.asu.edu/stories/200705/20070503_marsice.htm


It really didn't help that it took so long to get the soil sample into the
test chamber - any CO2 or water ice in it might have sublimated into the
atmosphere between the time it was scooped up and the time it finally got into
the test chamber days later.
Ideally, the soil sample goes into the test chamber within a few minutes after
the arm scoops it up, to preserve any volatile ices in it.
I still have grave doubts about it finding water ice, but would happily admit
to being wrong about this if firm proof of water ice is found, because of the
profound implications of such a finding.


Here's a really nice paper on the presumed history of water ice at
the Phoenix Mars landing site. Aptly named....

THE HISTORY OF ICE AT THE PHOENIX MARS
LANDING SITE
Lunar and Planetary Science XXXIX (2008) 1479

What's interesting is this statement below is about the age
of the ice.

"It is not reliably known when the last massive ice sheet
formed [14, 5, 6] or how humidity varies with time. In total,
four climate scenarios are simulated: Precipitation 5640 ka
ago and 632 ka ago (the most recent obliquity maximum with
~35 d) with constant humidity and time �varying humidity.
Figure 3 shows preliminary model results for the vertical
ice profile, if the last ice sheet formed 632 ka ago. The massive
ice sheet is much closer to the surface than it would be had
it last formed millions of years ago."
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2008/pdf/1479.pdf


Not so old as we've been led to believe all this time.
Nearer the surface means younger. And if that is ice
they've photographed so close to the surface....it must
be very young. Since the soil is thought to build from
dust accumulation from the air.

Since other data indicates Mars is just now exiting
an ice age and warming, it may be the last warm
period with liquid water near the surface could have
have been that figure of 630,000 years ago.

Not billions, maybe not even millions of years ago.
And another thing, it's pretty clear from the much
greater lag deposit at the Phoenix site that it's a much
older surface than at Meridiani, which is pure soil
with hardly a rock to be found. That implies water
ice could have been at Meridiani even more recently.

I'm going with ...all the white stuff... is water ice.






Pat


Under what conditions does carbonated salt water stay frozen?

Also, frozen hydrogen peroxide is not entirely impossible.

kk
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Belba Grubb
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Jun 28, 2008 3:06 am    Post subject: Re: ...First Microscopic Images of Soil from another World.. Reply with quote

On Jun 18, 5:15 am, "V for Vendicar"
<Execute_The_Traitor_In_The_White_Ho...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
  The atmospheric pressure 2cm under a pile of sand is not practically
different than the atmospheric pressure at the surface.

  Salt.

Say what one will against them, the European and UK papers have the
best headline writers bar none: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/06/27/phoenix_wet_chemistry/

Barb
--------
"One ought, every day at least, to hear a little song, read a good
poem, see a fine picture, and if it were possible, to speak a few
reasonable words."
-- Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, liked geology, had mineral named after
him.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


BradGuth
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 4:30 am    Post subject: Re: ...First Microscopic Images....It's gotta be Water-Ice! Reply with quote

On Jun 21, 9:22 pm, windbag <jaunty.akhena...@gmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
jonathan wrote:
"Pat Flannery" <flan...@daktel.com> wrote in message
news:28-dnQeJW7zSXMXVnZ2dnUVZ_rmdnZ2d@posted.northdakotatelephone...

George wrote:

NASA said today that the hole is directly beneath a thruster, and so is
probably the result of a thruster firing when the craft landed. They also
said that that might indicate that the slab is ice.

Or dry ice... I took a Bernz-O-Matic torch to water ice with very poor results
indeed, and the total time of the landing engine's impinging on the Martian
surface would be be very low, measured in a few seconds at most.

I was wondering about that. But I think they're going to find the white
slabs and material in the trench is indeed water ice. That area has
observations from the Odyssey orbiter showing from 30% to 60%
water ice in the first meter or so. Even in the first few inches.

The poles are all covered with Co2 ice, but on the fringes surrounding
the poles is a region of water ice. Which is where they landed.
So I think that's a slab of water ice with naturally bored holes.

The data supports a ...currently active...water cycle on Mars in
these areas. Which is what life needs. I believe the best conditions
for life would be where water transitions from water-ice-vapor
and back again. Not so much in any one of those realms, but where
the transition takes place. This landing site is looking better every
day. I'm getting psyched up!

Water Mass Map from Neutron Spectrometer
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/phoenix/multimedia/6433-20080513.html

ASU scientist finds Martian ice is patchy and variable

"The fact that ice is present near the depth of stability in the current
Martian climate shows that the ground ice is responding to
climate cycles," he says." "This implies that water ice in the ground
can swap places with water vapor in the atmosphere as the climate
changes, he says, adding:
"The THEMIS measurements support an active water cycle on Mars,
such as other research has predicted."
http://asunews.asu.edu/stories/200705/20070503_marsice.htm

It really didn't help that it took so long to get the soil sample into the
test chamber - any CO2 or water ice in it might have sublimated into the
atmosphere between the time it was scooped up and the time it finally got into
the test chamber days later.
Ideally, the soil sample goes into the test chamber within a few minutes after
the arm scoops it up, to preserve any volatile ices in it.
I still have grave doubts about it finding water ice, but would happily admit
to being wrong about this if firm proof of water ice is found, because of the
profound implications of such a finding.

Here's a really nice paper on the presumed history of water ice at
the Phoenix Mars landing site. Aptly named....

THE HISTORY OF ICE AT THE PHOENIX MARS
LANDING SITE
Lunar and Planetary Science XXXIX (2008) 1479

What's interesting is this statement below is about the age
of the ice.

"It is not reliably known when the last massive ice sheet
formed [14, 5, 6] or how humidity varies with time. In total,
four climate scenarios are simulated: Precipitation 5640 ka
ago and 632 ka ago (the most recent obliquity maximum with
~35 d) with constant humidity and time �varying humidity.
Figure 3 shows preliminary model results for the vertical
ice profile, if the last ice sheet formed 632 ka ago. The massive
ice sheet is much closer to the surface than it would be had
it last formed millions of years ago."
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2008/pdf/1479.pdf

Not so old as we've been led to believe all this time.
Nearer the surface means younger. And if that is ice
they've photographed so close to the surface....it must
be very young. Since the soil is thought to build from
dust accumulation from the air.

Since other data indicates Mars is just now exiting
an ice age and warming, it may be the last warm
period with liquid water near the surface could have
have been that figure of 630,000 years ago.

Not billions, maybe not even millions of years ago.
And another thing, it's pretty clear from the much
greater lag deposit at the Phoenix site that it's a much
older surface than at Meridiani, which is pure soil
with hardly a rock to be found. That implies water
ice could have been at Meridiani even more recently.

I'm going with ...all the white stuff... is water ice.

Pat

Under what conditions does carbonated salt water stay frozen?

Also, frozen hydrogen peroxide is not entirely impossible.

kk

Why no mass spectrometer readings?

- Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


V for Vendicar
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 4:54 pm    Post subject: Re: ...First Microscopic Images....It's gotta be Water-Ice! Reply with quote

"BradGuth" <bradguth@gmail.com> wrote
Quote:
Why no mass spectrometer readings?

Give them time.

Water ice frost has been photographed on the surface of mars by various mars
landers. So the finding of water ice frost is nothing new. It does support
the idea that there is a large quantity of water ice below the surface
however - which is what the radar indicated.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Science Talk Forum Index -> Astrology All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Australian Debt Consolidation Experts
medical insurance
Wedding Websites
Search Escorts and girls (incall/OutCall) online with Oasi2000, ItaliaChiamami, BestAnnunci...
Get Laid Tonight
Desktop Enhancements
car insurance quotes
Make Your Own Website
Cheap phone calls to Canada
Long island Cleaning service
mold killer
UK Swingers Genuine Contacts Site
Free Cams
ink cartridges
Tantra sex positions
bissell Vacuum parts


Board Security

170 Attacks blocked

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group