|
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Ben Kaufman
Guest
|
 Posted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 4:45 pm Post subject: Re: The Thirteen Lies of Gabriel - Lie #13 |
 |
|
On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 23:06:26 -0400, Gabriel <gabriel_baptist@hotmail.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 22:17:54 -0700, "Mike Painter"
mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
: Gabriel wrote:
: <snip
: > Well the beliefs of evolutionism are not even scientific: they're
: > not observable, testable or verifiable.
:
:
: All of science says it is science.
All of them? No, now you're telling a lie. 
|
Whoops, updating the subject.. This is lie #13.
Ben |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Masked Avenger
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 11:12 am Post subject: Re: The Twelve Lies of Gabriel - Lie #1 |
|
|
Gabriel wrote:
| Quote: |
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 22:17:54 -0700, "Mike Painter"
mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
: Gabriel wrote:
: <snip
: > Well the beliefs of evolutionism are not even scientific: they're
: > not observable, testable or verifiable.
:
:
: All of science says it is science.
All of them? No, now you're telling a lie.
|
BULLSHIT ! ......
Please go to this site ( although I know you won't because you are
afraid of it )
http://nationalacademies.org/evolution/
.... and try and find ONE refutation of Evolution ...... If the
National Academy of Sciences isn't the ultimate authority on this
subject then who is ? ... not you ... that's for sure .....
--
MA ....Yoiks .... and away .....
Only two things are infinite, the Universe and human stupidity
.............. and I'm not sure about the Universe ..........
- A. Einstein
Does Schrödinger's cat have 18 half lives ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Budikka666
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 10:38 pm Post subject: Yawn: Yet Another Non-Existent Transitional Fossil Found |
|
|
Whilst Gabriel continues to RUN from all questions and challenges,
indeed, from all attempts to engage him in a rationale, intelligent,
supported discussion on any evolution topic, real scientists, many of
whom share Gabriel's faith, continue to provide so-called "missing"
links and key fossils demonstrating, without any reasonable doubt,
that organisms of one "type" can and do indeed change over time into
organisms of a different "type":
http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/science/06/25/fishfossil.ap/index.html
Budikka |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
John Locke
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 9:18 am Post subject: Re: Yawn: Yet Another Non-Existent Transitional Fossil Found |
|
|
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:38:50 -0700 (PDT), Budikka666
<budikka1@netscape.net> wrote:
| Quote: |
Whilst Gabriel continues to RUN from all questions and challenges,
indeed, from all attempts to engage him in a rationale, intelligent,
supported discussion on any evolution topic, real scientists, many of
whom share Gabriel's faith, continue to provide so-called "missing"
links and key fossils demonstrating, without any reasonable doubt,
that organisms of one "type" can and do indeed change over time into
organisms of a different "type":
http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/science/06/25/fishfossil.ap/index.html
...."God" put that fossil there to test our faith ! Its only been in |
the ground for 6 months.
"There is not enough love and kindness in the world
to give any of it away to imaginary beings." - Friederich Nietzsche |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
johac
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 10:42 am Post subject: Re: Yawn: Yet Another Non-Existent Transitional Fossil Found |
|
|
In article
<2fbba5e2-20a3-498e-bc99-dbcfa2f6d98d@59g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
Budikka666 <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote:
| Quote: |
Whilst Gabriel continues to RUN from all questions and challenges,
indeed, from all attempts to engage him in a rationale, intelligent,
supported discussion on any evolution topic, real scientists, many of
whom share Gabriel's faith, continue to provide so-called "missing"
links and key fossils demonstrating, without any reasonable doubt,
that organisms of one "type" can and do indeed change over time into
organisms of a different "type":
http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/science/06/25/fishfossil.ap/index.html
|
This was another great find. Those gaps keep getting filled. Another
nail in the coffin of creationism.
I was going to post this myself but you beat me again. 
John #1782 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Budikka666
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 10:59 pm Post subject: Re: Yawn: Yet Another Non-Existent Transitional Fossil Found |
|
|
On Jun 26, 6:09 am, "adman" <72...@hottmail.et> wrote:
| Quote: |
"johac" <jhachm...@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:jhachmann-1486CB.22420425062008@news.giganews.com...
| In article
| <2fbba5e2-20a3-498e-bc99-dbcfa2f6d...@59g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,| Budikka666 <budik...@netscape.net> wrote:
|
| > Whilst Gabriel continues to RUN from all questions and challenges,
| > indeed, from all attempts to engage him in a rationale, intelligent,
| > supported discussion on any evolution topic, real scientists, many of
| > whom share Gabriel's faith, continue to provide so-called "missing"
| > links and key fossils demonstrating, without any reasonable doubt,
| > that organisms of one "type" can and do indeed change over time into
| > organisms of a different "type":
| >http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/science/06/25/fishfossil.ap/index.html
|
| This was another great find. Those gaps keep getting filled. Another
| nail in the coffin of creationism.
|
| I was going to post this myself but you beat me again. :-)
What a load of horseCrap.
Will you believe anything you read as long as it suits your
evolution-based-lies?And while we are on the subject of believing crap...do
you actually think those bones survived 365 MILLION years?
|
Nope. That's why it's a fossil, Dickhead. The actual bone has become
mineralized.
Next time, before you open your amazingly ignorant and stupid mouth,
try thinking.
BTW, what happened to that debate you challenged us to "bring on" a
few months back, and from which you've been running ever since you
pathetic chicken?
Budikka |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Budikka666
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 11:03 pm Post subject: Re: Yawn: Yet Another Non-Existent Transitional Fossil Found |
|
|
On Jun 26, 12:44 pm, "Mike Painter" <mddotpain...@sbcglobal.net>
wrote:
| Quote: |
Cory Albrecht wrote:
Whilst Gabriel continues to RUN from all questions and challenges,
indeed, from all attempts to engage him in a rationale,
intelligent, supported discussion on any evolution topic, real
scientists, many of whom share Gabriel's faith, continue to
provide so-called "missing" links and key fossils demonstrating,
without any reasonable doubt, that organisms of one "type" can and
do indeed change over time into organisms of a different "type":
http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/science/06/25/fishfossil.ap/index.html
This was another great find. Those gaps keep getting filled. Another
nail in the coffin of creationism.
I was going to post this myself but you beat me again. :-)
What a load of horseCrap.
Will you believe anything you read as long as it suits your
evolution-based-lies?And while we are on the subject of believing
crap...do you actually think those bones survived 365 MILLION years?
bwahahahah!!!!!! tonz-0-laughter!!
Show that fossilization can't happen.
Show that radiometric dating doesn't work, and that by implication all
physics is wrong.
If the earth is 6000 years old then he should be able to show us at least as
many real bones from the the time period we say is 365 million years old.
Most would date from the "time of the flood" and would only be 4000 or so
years old.
There should be almost no fossilized bones found.
|
He should also be able to explain, given that all the organisms in the
fossil record were killed just 4,500 or so years ago in a global
flood, why they're in general, found to be more and more mineralized
the older the stratum they're in.
But my guess is that we won't see any explanation, no answers, no
supported argument, no evidence, and Chicken Sadman running yet again
from a debate.
Budikka |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 6:45 am Post subject: Re: Yawn: Yet Another Non-Existent Transitional Fossil Found |
|
|
On Jun 26, 6:38 am, Budikka666 <budik...@netscape.net> wrote:
| Quote: |
Whilst Gabriel continues to RUN from all questions and challenges,
indeed, from all attempts to engage him in a rationale, intelligent,
supported discussion on any evolution topic, real scientists, many of
whom share Gabriel's faith, continue to provide so-called "missing"
links and key fossils demonstrating, without any reasonable doubt,
that organisms of one "type" can and do indeed change over time into
organisms of a different "type":http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/science/06/25/fishfossil.ap/index.html
Budikka
|
Why do you think that Gabriel can be rationale, intelligent?
He has none of those. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 6:48 am Post subject: Re: Yawn: Yet Another Non-Existent Transitional Fossil Found |
|
|
On Jun 26, 7:09 pm, "adman" <72...@hottmail.et> wrote:
| Quote: |
"johac" <jhachm...@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:jhachmann-1486CB.22420425062008@news.giganews.com...
| In article
| <2fbba5e2-20a3-498e-bc99-dbcfa2f6d...@59g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,| Budikka666 <budik...@netscape.net> wrote:
|
| > Whilst Gabriel continues to RUN from all questions and challenges,
| > indeed, from all attempts to engage him in a rationale, intelligent,
| > supported discussion on any evolution topic, real scientists, many of
| > whom share Gabriel's faith, continue to provide so-called "missing"
| > links and key fossils demonstrating, without any reasonable doubt,
| > that organisms of one "type" can and do indeed change over time into
| > organisms of a different "type":
| >http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/science/06/25/fishfossil.ap/index.html
|
| This was another great find. Those gaps keep getting filled. Another
| nail in the coffin of creationism.
|
| I was going to post this myself but you beat me again. :-)
What a load of horseCrap.
Will you believe anything you read as long as it suits your
evolution-based-lies?And while we are on the subject of believing crap...do
you actually think those bones survived 365 MILLION years?
bwahahahah!!!!!! tonz-0-laughter!!
|
| > Budikka
| --
| John #1782
|
Compare to our earth of 4.5 billions years, your 6 thousands years for
you is just like a conceiving baby in the womb.
So, you don't know anything to post.....go. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 7:14 am Post subject: Re: The Twelve Lies of Gabriel - Lie #1 |
|
|
On Jun 27, 12:49 pm, Gabriel <gabriel_bapt...@hotmail.com> wrote:
<snip some BS>
ZOMG, why haven't I killfiled Gab the liar ages back? Or has my
killfile disappeared?
Al |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Gabriel
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 7:38 am Post subject: Re: The Twelve Lies of Gabriel - Lie #1 |
|
|
On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 20:50:18 -0700, "Mike Painter"
<mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
: Gabriel wrote:
: > On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 22:17:54 -0700, "Mike Painter"
: > <mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
: >
: >> Gabriel wrote:
: >> <snip>
: >>> Well the beliefs of evolutionism are not even scientific: they're
: >>> not observable, testable or verifiable.
: >>>
: >>
: >> All of science says it is science.
: >
: > All of them? No, now you're telling a lie.
:
: Name a science that says evolution is false.
Other sciences don't say anything about molecules to man
evolutionism (for or against). I.e., they don't "all say it's
science", as you claimed. They don't all say "molecules to man
evolutionism is science", as you claim. They don't say anything.
They only bring their own observations to the table related to
their specific field. (For example, this is how old we believe
this layer of stone is, or this is what we believe happens in the
genome, and so on). It's only the disciples of molecules to man
evolutionists that claim all these things lead to their beliefs
being true.
Now, if you're going to talk about actual scientists within
different disciplines of science, there are many scientists that
do not agree with molecules to man evolution at all as well.
:
: |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Gabriel
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 7:49 am Post subject: Re: The Twelve Lies of Gabriel - Lie #1 |
|
|
On Sun, 22 Jun 2008 16:13:17 +1000, Masked Avenger
<cootey_59@yahoo.com> wrote:
: Gabriel wrote:
: > On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 22:17:54 -0700, "Mike Painter"
: > <mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
: >
: > : Gabriel wrote:
: > : <snip>
: > : > Well the beliefs of evolutionism are not even scientific: they're
: > : > not observable, testable or verifiable.
: > : >
: > :
: > : All of science says it is science.
: >
: > All of them? No, now you're telling a lie.
:
: BULLSHIT ! ......
:
: Please go to this site ( although I know you won't because you are
: afraid of it )
:
: http://nationalacademies.org/evolution/
This is not "all sciences claiming molecules to man is science".
It's an organization with men and women elected, no doubt who are
screened to make sure they believe in molecules to man
evolutionism.
Meanwhile the number of scientists continue to grow who do not
believe in molecules to man evolutionism at all. All sciences
claiming molecules to man is science would involve every single
scientist claiming to believe in it. Funny how it requires belief
when actual science doesn't, because actual science is concerning
specific things that are observable, testable and verifiable and
require no "faith" at all.
:
: .... and try and find ONE refutation of Evolution ...... If the
: National Academy of Sciences isn't the ultimate authority on this
: subject then who is ? ... not you ... that's for sure .....
Molecules to man evolutionism is easily refuted: what they
believe is not observable, not testable and not verifiable.
Refuted. Welcome to religion: that which is unobservable,
untestable and unverifiable.
Want to show otherwise? Show one such observation of populations
of animals that are not rats producing, over generations, animals
that are rats. Such a molecules to man evolution is not
observable, not verifiable and not testable.
Animals adapting? We're aware of it.
Bacteria adapting? We're aware of it.
Populations of animals that are not rats producing, over
generations, animals that are rats? Never observed. Not testable.
Not verifiable.
Molecules to man evolution? Same. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
johac
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 10:35 am Post subject: Re: Yawn: Yet Another Non-Existent Transitional Fossil Found |
|
|
In article <6MK8k.12755$3F5.8680@bignews2.bellsouth.net>,
"adman" <72545@hottmail.et> wrote:
| Quote: |
"johac" <jhachmann@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:jhachmann-1486CB.22420425062008@news.giganews.com...
| In article
| <2fbba5e2-20a3-498e-bc99-dbcfa2f6d98d@59g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
| Budikka666 <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote:
|
| > Whilst Gabriel continues to RUN from all questions and challenges,
| > indeed, from all attempts to engage him in a rationale, intelligent,
| > supported discussion on any evolution topic, real scientists, many of
| > whom share Gabriel's faith, continue to provide so-called "missing"
| > links and key fossils demonstrating, without any reasonable doubt,
| > that organisms of one "type" can and do indeed change over time into
| > organisms of a different "type":
| > http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/science/06/25/fishfossil.ap/index.html
|
| This was another great find. Those gaps keep getting filled. Another
| nail in the coffin of creationism.
|
| I was going to post this myself but you beat me again. :-)
What a load of horseCrap.
Will you believe anything you read as long as it suits your
evolution-based-lies?And while we are on the subject of believing crap...do
you actually think those bones survived 365 MILLION years?
bwahahahah!!!!!! tonz-0-laughter!!
|
Idiot! You're so ignorant that you don't even know what a fossil is.
| Quote: |
|
| > Budikka
| --
| John #1782
-- |
John #1782 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Alex W.
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 11:01 am Post subject: Re: Yawn: Yet Another Non-Existent Transitional Fossil Found |
|
|
"johac" <jhachmann@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:jhachmann-7C32B7.22352426062008@news.giganews.com...
| Quote: |
Idiot! You're so ignorant that you don't even know what a fossil is.
|
Issa watch! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Mike Painter
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 11:01 am Post subject: Re: The Twelve Lies of Gabriel - Lie #1 |
|
|
Gabriel wrote:
| Quote: |
On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 20:50:18 -0700, "Mike Painter"
mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Gabriel wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 22:17:54 -0700, "Mike Painter"
mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Gabriel wrote:
snip
Well the beliefs of evolutionism are not even scientific: they're
not observable, testable or verifiable.
All of science says it is science.
All of them? No, now you're telling a lie. :-(
Name a science that says evolution is false.
Other sciences don't say anything about molecules to man
evolutionism (for or against). I.e., they don't "all say it's
science", as you claimed. They don't all say "molecules to man
evolutionism is science", as you claim. They don't say anything.
|
I asked you to name a science that supports your claim "All of them? No, now
you're telling a lie. "
| Quote: |
They only bring their own observations to the table related to
their specific field. (For example, this is how old we believe
this layer of stone is, or this is what we believe happens in the
genome, and so on). It's only the disciples of molecules to man
evolutionists that claim all these things lead to their beliefs
being true.
Now, if you're going to talk about actual scientists within
different disciplines of science, there are many scientists that
do not agree with molecules to man evolution at all as well.
|
If you understood half of what you write, you would not have written the
above. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
