|
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Sam Buckland
Guest
|
 Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 5:40 am Post subject: Re: More scientific evidence of the flood of the BibleA new |
 |
|
vernono wrote:
| Quote: |
(PLONK)
Monty Python |
RUN AWAY!!!!!
</Monty Python>
LOL! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Sam Buckland
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 5:49 am Post subject: Re: More scientific evidence of the flood of the BibleA new |
|
|
Ken wrote:
| Quote: |
On Jul 1, 5:40 pm, Sam Buckland <noth...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
vernono wrote:
(PLONK)
Monty Python
RUN AWAY!!!!!
/Monty Python
LOL!
Ummmmm
Verno reminds me of ASSman's and christ's love posting habits, both of
whom have recently disappeared
|
Must be lonely in his little world. He seems to "plonk"
EVERYONE.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Cory Albrecht
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 6:16 am Post subject: Re: More scientific evidence of the flood of the BibleA new |
|
|
vernono wrote:
| Quote: |
"Sam Buckland" <nothing@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:g4due1$tic$1@registered.motzarella.org...
vernono wrote:
"Sam Buckland" <nothing@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:g4dsm6$jm4$1@registered.motzarella.org...
vernono wrote:
"Snowman" <jkelley@zoomnet.net> wrote in message
news:682ae38a-770f-4c22-8d6d-1e556f504477@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
From what I've read,the word translated as "world" in the flood
account is more often used to mean "country" or "reigon".
"World" is a rather unusual translation for it.
That's a very common interpretation. Country or entire region. It
could easily be what was said.
BUT independent of any biblical connection, the entire earth has been
under water several times
Not all at once, it wasn't.
ALL AT ONCE
Nope. Never happened.
Oh, gee you better tell that to the majority of geologists.
The earth STARTED as completely covered in water.
|
Provide a cite from a geological science reference that says so. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Cory Albrecht
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 6:18 am Post subject: Re: More scientific evidence of the flood of the BibleA new |
|
|
vernono wrote:
| Quote: |
"Sam Buckland" <nothing@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:g4e4p9$sop$1@registered.motzarella.org...
vernono wrote:
"Sam Buckland" <nothing@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:g4due1$tic$1@registered.motzarella.org...
vernono wrote:
"Sam Buckland" <nothing@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:g4dsm6$jm4$1@registered.motzarella.org...
vernono wrote:
"Snowman" <jkelley@zoomnet.net> wrote in message
news:682ae38a-770f-4c22-8d6d-1e556f504477@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
From what I've read,the word translated as "world" in the flood
account is more often used to mean "country" or "reigon".
"World" is a rather unusual translation for it.
That's a very common interpretation. Country or entire region. It
could easily be what was said.
BUT independent of any biblical connection, the entire earth has been
under water several times
Not all at once, it wasn't.
ALL AT ONCE
Nope. Never happened.
Oh, gee you better tell that to the majority of geologists.
Why? They already KNOW it never happened.
The earth STARTED as completely covered in water.
In a word, "bullshit".
No, water.
get an education. You have ZERO.
|
"Zero"? You mean the number of cites to evidence that you have provided? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Cory Albrecht
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 6:21 am Post subject: Re: More scientific evidence of the flood of the BibleA new |
|
|
vernono wrote:
| Quote: |
"Peter Kelsey" <peter_a_kelseyNO@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:8e-dnXvKZ4G9MvfVnZ2dnUVZ_jqdnZ2d@comcast.com...
I can understand why you're running away... he made you look
pretty silly. All you really had left was to change topics and
run away. I mean, you certainly don't have any "facts" or
support!
Just common geologic and solar education.
|
If it's that common, then it should be trivial for you to provide cites
that show the entire surface of the Earth was under water at one point.
| Quote: |
Forget trying to prove something about the bible that no one said.
The atheist religion is the narrowest and made up of the uneducated.
Note: to the dimwits, I said atheist not non-theist. Atheists don't know
the difference. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Cory Albrecht
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 6:23 am Post subject: Re: More scientific evidence of the flood of the BibleA new |
|
|
vernono wrote:
| Quote: |
"Free Lunch" <lunch@nofreelunch.us> wrote in message
news:8thl64d5lnbr9tb8jld4qhn9lfok538lak@4ax.com...
On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 13:34:45 -0700, in alt.talk.creationism
"vernono" <vernono@there.com> wrote in
Exwak.62579$xd1.44741@fe087.usenetserver.com>:
"Sam Buckland" <nothing@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:g4due1$tic$1@registered.motzarella.org...
vernono wrote:
"Sam Buckland" <nothing@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:g4dsm6$jm4$1@registered.motzarella.org...
vernono wrote:
"Snowman" <jkelley@zoomnet.net> wrote in message
news:682ae38a-770f-4c22-8d6d-1e556f504477@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
From what I've read,the word translated as "world" in the flood
account is more often used to mean "country" or "reigon".
"World" is a rather unusual translation for it.
That's a very common interpretation. Country or entire region. It
could easily be what was said.
BUT independent of any biblical connection, the entire earth has been
under water several times
Not all at once, it wasn't.
ALL AT ONCE
Nope. Never happened.
Oh, gee you better tell that to the majority of geologists.
The earth STARTED as completely covered in water.
So, why don't you provide a reference to support your claim rather than
just repeat yourself?
Geology 101 at almost any University. (Maybe not bible colleges)
|
If that is the case then it should be trivial for you to provide cites
from a textbook use din one of the "Geology 101" courses where the
textbook states the entire surface of the Earth was underwater at one time. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Cory Albrecht
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 6:24 am Post subject: Re: More scientific evidence of the flood of the BibleA new |
|
|
vernono wrote:
| Quote: |
"Free Lunch" <lunch@nofreelunch.us> wrote in message
news:djil641kdau848bu58k674m587sqf4aq8p@4ax.com...
On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 17:16:32 -0700, in alt.talk.creationism
"vernono" <vernono@there.com> wrote in
zNzak.31766$aQ3.586@fe085.usenetserver.com>:
"Free Lunch" <lunch@nofreelunch.us> wrote in message
news:8thl64d5lnbr9tb8jld4qhn9lfok538lak@4ax.com...
On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 13:34:45 -0700, in alt.talk.creationism
"vernono" <vernono@there.com> wrote in
Exwak.62579$xd1.44741@fe087.usenetserver.com>:
"Sam Buckland" <nothing@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:g4due1$tic$1@registered.motzarella.org...
vernono wrote:
"Sam Buckland" <nothing@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:g4dsm6$jm4$1@registered.motzarella.org...
vernono wrote:
"Snowman" <jkelley@zoomnet.net> wrote in message
news:682ae38a-770f-4c22-8d6d-1e556f504477@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
From what I've read,the word translated as "world" in the flood
account is more often used to mean "country" or "reigon".
"World" is a rather unusual translation for it.
That's a very common interpretation. Country or entire region. It
could easily be what was said.
BUT independent of any biblical connection, the entire earth has
been
under water several times
Not all at once, it wasn't.
ALL AT ONCE
Nope. Never happened.
Oh, gee you better tell that to the majority of geologists.
The earth STARTED as completely covered in water.
So, why don't you provide a reference to support your claim rather than
just repeat yourself?
Geology 101 at almost any University. (Maybe not bible colleges)
You know that is not a reference. Try again or we will know that you had
no idea what you were talking about and told us lies to further your
relgious doctrines.
In your total ignorance, you have not noticed that I do not agree with most
interpretations of the bible.
Your religion (atheism) blinds you to that simple little fact.
|
Yet you still do not provide a cite that shows the entire surface of the
Earth was underwater at one time.
Why can you not provide such evidence to back up your claim? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Cory Albrecht
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 6:26 am Post subject: Re: More scientific evidence of the flood of the BibleA new |
|
|
vernono wrote:
Is providing a cite which shows that the entire surface of the Earth was
underwater at one time so difficult for you to do that you have to plonk
those whoas you for it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
TimK
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 6:39 am Post subject: Re: More scientific evidence of the flood of the BibleA new |
|
|
"Pastor Dave" <ananias917_@_gmail.com> wrote in message
news:i7vj64lhb33o7vdfnpt0256lff9oaihlbj@4ax.com...
| Quote: |
Now like I said, I won't bother with word arguments.
I will simply ask you... If the flood was only regional,
why didn't God just tell Noah to MOVE??? Hello???
|
In the first place it's "as I said" and in the second place you can't use
one part of the bible to prove another part. That's circular. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
TimK
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 7:17 am Post subject: Re: More scientific evidence of the flood of the BibleA new |
|
|
<EskWIRED@spamblock.panix.com> wrote in message
news:g4en3p$eo2$4@reader2.panix.com...
| Quote: |
I made no claim that you said anything. Instead, I accused you of having
insufficient faith.
|
Faith is a form of mental illness - R. Dawkins. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Free Lunch
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 7:25 am Post subject: Nonsense: More scientific evidence of the flood of the Bible |
|
|
On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 17:37:41 -0700, in alt.talk.creationism
"vernono" <vernono@there.com> wrote in
<o5Aak.11099$5y2.6812@fe113.usenetserver.com>:
| Quote: |
"Free Lunch" <lunch@nofreelunch.us> wrote in message
news:djil641kdau848bu58k674m587sqf4aq8p@4ax.com...
On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 17:16:32 -0700, in alt.talk.creationism
"vernono" <vernono@there.com> wrote in
zNzak.31766$aQ3.586@fe085.usenetserver.com>:
"Free Lunch" <lunch@nofreelunch.us> wrote in message
news:8thl64d5lnbr9tb8jld4qhn9lfok538lak@4ax.com...
On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 13:34:45 -0700, in alt.talk.creationism
"vernono" <vernono@there.com> wrote in
Exwak.62579$xd1.44741@fe087.usenetserver.com>:
"Sam Buckland" <nothing@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:g4due1$tic$1@registered.motzarella.org...
vernono wrote:
"Sam Buckland" <nothing@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:g4dsm6$jm4$1@registered.motzarella.org...
vernono wrote:
"Snowman" <jkelley@zoomnet.net> wrote in message
news:682ae38a-770f-4c22-8d6d-1e556f504477@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
From what I've read,the word translated as "world" in the flood
account is more often used to mean "country" or "reigon".
"World" is a rather unusual translation for it.
That's a very common interpretation. Country or entire region. It
could easily be what was said.
BUT independent of any biblical connection, the entire earth has
been
under water several times
Not all at once, it wasn't.
ALL AT ONCE
Nope. Never happened.
Oh, gee you better tell that to the majority of geologists.
The earth STARTED as completely covered in water.
So, why don't you provide a reference to support your claim rather than
just repeat yourself?
Geology 101 at almost any University. (Maybe not bible colleges)
You know that is not a reference. Try again or we will know that you had
no idea what you were talking about and told us lies to further your
relgious doctrines.
In your total ignorance, you have not noticed that I do not agree with most
interpretations of the bible.
|
So what?
| Quote: |
Your religion (atheism) blinds you to that simple little fact.
|
I don't have a religion. Your lies will not change that. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Sam Buckland
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 7:27 am Post subject: Re: Nonsense: More scientific evidence of the flood of the B |
|
|
Free Lunch wrote:
| Quote: |
On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 17:37:41 -0700, in alt.talk.creationism
"vernono" <vernono@there.com> wrote in
o5Aak.11099$5y2.6812@fe113.usenetserver.com>:
"Free Lunch" <lunch@nofreelunch.us> wrote in message
news:djil641kdau848bu58k674m587sqf4aq8p@4ax.com...
On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 17:16:32 -0700, in alt.talk.creationism
"vernono" <vernono@there.com> wrote in
zNzak.31766$aQ3.586@fe085.usenetserver.com>:
"Free Lunch" <lunch@nofreelunch.us> wrote in message
news:8thl64d5lnbr9tb8jld4qhn9lfok538lak@4ax.com...
On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 13:34:45 -0700, in alt.talk.creationism
"vernono" <vernono@there.com> wrote in
Exwak.62579$xd1.44741@fe087.usenetserver.com>:
"Sam Buckland" <nothing@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:g4due1$tic$1@registered.motzarella.org...
vernono wrote:
"Sam Buckland" <nothing@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:g4dsm6$jm4$1@registered.motzarella.org...
vernono wrote:
"Snowman" <jkelley@zoomnet.net> wrote in message
news:682ae38a-770f-4c22-8d6d-1e556f504477@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
From what I've read,the word translated as "world" in the flood
account is more often used to mean "country" or "reigon".
"World" is a rather unusual translation for it.
That's a very common interpretation. Country or entire region. It
could easily be what was said.
BUT independent of any biblical connection, the entire earth has
been
under water several times
Not all at once, it wasn't.
ALL AT ONCE
Nope. Never happened.
Oh, gee you better tell that to the majority of geologists.
The earth STARTED as completely covered in water.
So, why don't you provide a reference to support your claim rather than
just repeat yourself?
Geology 101 at almost any University. (Maybe not bible colleges)
You know that is not a reference. Try again or we will know that you had
no idea what you were talking about and told us lies to further your
relgious doctrines.
In your total ignorance, you have not noticed that I do not agree with most
interpretations of the bible.
So what?
|
So, he's hoping you won't notice that he's changed the topic,
AND still can't produce any support. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Stormin Mormon
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 7:34 am Post subject: Re: More scientific evidence of the flood of the BibleA new |
|
|
Well, that's highly useful. None of the (several) posters in this thread
know it's him or her.
--
Christopher A. Young
Learn more about Jesus
www.lds.org
..
"vernono" <vernono@there.com> wrote in message
news:S5Aak.11100$5y2.167@fe113.usenetserver.com...
(PLONK) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Stormin Mormon
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 7:34 am Post subject: Re: More scientific evidence of the flood of the BibleA new |
|
|
I guess we'll all have to start posting more, and see who he quotes?
--
Christopher A. Young
Learn more about Jesus
www.lds.org
..
"Sam Buckland" <nothing@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:g4eipb$u9q$1@registered.motzarella.org...
vernono wrote:
| Quote: |
(PLONK)
Monty Python |
RUN AWAY!!!!!
</Monty Python>
LOL! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Wombat
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 7:55 pm Post subject: Re: More scientific evidence of the flood of the BibleA new |
|
|
On 2 Jul, 19:24, "vernono" <vern...@there.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
"Wombat" <tri...@multiweb.nl> wrote in message
news:d1cc64e0-682e-4a97-9d6a-79ae830bf5ae@79g2000hsk.googlegroups.com...
On 1 Jul, 20:27, "vernono" <vern...@there.com> wrote:
"Wombat" <tri...@multiweb.nl> wrote in message
news:a344f765-f677-4721-85be-65afa294bc31@8g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On 1 Jul, 11:49, Pastor Dave <ananias917_@_gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 01:19:38 -0700 (PDT), Snowman
jkel...@zoomnet.net> spake thusly:
From what I've read,the word translated as "world" in the flood
account is more often used to mean "country" or "reigon".
"World" is a rather unusual translation for it.
Not true. But rather than get into word arguments,
let me say flat out, that what you are trying to do is
to find a way to compromise with man, because they
claim that you are stupid for believing what you do
and that "science proves you wrong", when no such
thing is true and in reality, you're just too lazy to
find out. And the time when you are "stupid",
is when you take the word of those who claim that
ideas based on an atheistic world view are true
and don't do REAL RESEARCH for yourself!!!
Now like I said, I won't bother with word arguments.
I will simply ask you... If the flood was only regional,
why didn't God just tell Noah to MOVE??? Hello??? :)
So when the gospel states that Caesar Augustus sent out a decree
saying the whole world was to be taxed (Luke 2:1) he was expecting the
civilisations in South America would send in their wack?
Wombat
Cute.
Always watch for context.
And the context is?
DUUUHHH Caesar's world
|
In about 9 BC 2 Roman legions commanded by a certain General Varus
were virtually wiped out in what is now Germany.
Augustus was unable to reoccupy Germany. Also the Romans were aware
of an empire to their east that was powerful (look up the career of
Crassus). They were also aware of powerful states in India and China.
Therefore, you ignorant pillock, don't talk context unless you know
what you are talking about.
Wombat |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
