|
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
vernono
Guest
|
 Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 3:13 am Post subject: Re: More scientific evidence of the flood of the BibleA new |
 |
|
"Sam Buckland" <nothing@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:g4e56j$sop$2@registered.motzarella.org...
| Quote: |
vernono wrote:
"Sam Buckland" <nothing@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:g4e4p9$sop$1@registered.motzarella.org...
vernono wrote:
"Sam Buckland" <nothing@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:g4due1$tic$1@registered.motzarella.org...
vernono wrote:
"Sam Buckland" <nothing@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:g4dsm6$jm4$1@registered.motzarella.org...
vernono wrote:
"Snowman" <jkelley@zoomnet.net> wrote in message
news:682ae38a-770f-4c22-8d6d-1e556f504477@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
From what I've read,the word translated as "world" in the flood
account is more often used to mean "country" or "reigon".
"World" is a rather unusual translation for it.
That's a very common interpretation. Country or entire region. It
could easily be what was said.
BUT independent of any biblical connection, the entire earth has
been under water several times
Not all at once, it wasn't.
ALL AT ONCE
Nope. Never happened.
Oh, gee you better tell that to the majority of geologists.
Why? They already KNOW it never happened.
The earth STARTED as completely covered in water.
In a word, "bullshit".
No, water.
No, bullshit was correct.
get an education. You have ZERO.
And yet, mine is apparently MUCH better than yours...
Go figure.
|
Here's another couple.to tax you little brain
Africa, SE Asia and South America were all one continent / island at one
time with no real mountains.
The tallest mountain peak on earth is completely under water.
The Earth and Mars originated at some place other than our solar system.
There is question about the moon.
None of these facts have anything to do with the bible.
Now go play with yourself.
(PLONK) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Sam Buckland
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 3:21 am Post subject: Re: More scientific evidence of the flood of the BibleA new |
|
|
vernono wrote:
| Quote: |
"Sam Buckland" <nothing@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:g4e56j$sop$2@registered.motzarella.org...
vernono wrote:
"Sam Buckland" <nothing@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:g4e4p9$sop$1@registered.motzarella.org...
vernono wrote:
"Sam Buckland" <nothing@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:g4due1$tic$1@registered.motzarella.org...
vernono wrote:
"Sam Buckland" <nothing@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:g4dsm6$jm4$1@registered.motzarella.org...
vernono wrote:
"Snowman" <jkelley@zoomnet.net> wrote in message
news:682ae38a-770f-4c22-8d6d-1e556f504477@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
From what I've read,the word translated as "world" in the flood
account is more often used to mean "country" or "reigon".
"World" is a rather unusual translation for it.
That's a very common interpretation. Country or entire region. It
could easily be what was said.
BUT independent of any biblical connection, the entire earth has
been under water several times
Not all at once, it wasn't.
ALL AT ONCE
Nope. Never happened.
Oh, gee you better tell that to the majority of geologists.
Why? They already KNOW it never happened.
The earth STARTED as completely covered in water.
In a word, "bullshit".
No, water.
No, bullshit was correct.
get an education. You have ZERO.
And yet, mine is apparently MUCH better than yours...
Go figure.
Here's another couple.to tax you little brain
|
Why? You haven't figured out the FIRST one yet. The earth was
NEVER "completely covered in water". Sorry, sport! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Peter Kelsey
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 3:26 am Post subject: Re: More scientific evidence of the flood of the BibleA new |
|
|
vernono wrote:
| Quote: |
"Sam Buckland" <nothing@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:g4e56j$sop$2@registered.motzarella.org...
vernono wrote:
"Sam Buckland" <nothing@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:g4e4p9$sop$1@registered.motzarella.org...
vernono wrote:
"Sam Buckland" <nothing@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:g4due1$tic$1@registered.motzarella.org...
vernono wrote:
"Sam Buckland" <nothing@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:g4dsm6$jm4$1@registered.motzarella.org...
vernono wrote:
"Snowman" <jkelley@zoomnet.net> wrote in message
news:682ae38a-770f-4c22-8d6d-1e556f504477@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
From what I've read,the word translated as "world" in the flood
account is more often used to mean "country" or "reigon".
"World" is a rather unusual translation for it.
That's a very common interpretation. Country or entire region. It
could easily be what was said.
BUT independent of any biblical connection, the entire earth has
been under water several times
Not all at once, it wasn't.
ALL AT ONCE
Nope. Never happened.
Oh, gee you better tell that to the majority of geologists.
Why? They already KNOW it never happened.
The earth STARTED as completely covered in water.
In a word, "bullshit".
No, water.
No, bullshit was correct.
get an education. You have ZERO.
And yet, mine is apparently MUCH better than yours...
Go figure.
Here's another couple.to tax you little brain
Africa, SE Asia and South America were all one continent / island at one
time with no real mountains.
The tallest mountain peak on earth is completely under water.
The Earth and Mars originated at some place other than our solar system.
There is question about the moon.
None of these facts have anything to do with the bible.
Now go play with yourself.
(PLONK)
I can understand why you're running away... he made you look |
pretty silly. All you really had left was to change topics and
run away. I mean, you certainly don't have any "facts" or
support! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
TimK
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 4:08 am Post subject: Re: More scientific evidence of the flood of the BibleA new |
|
|
"vernono" <vernono@there.com> wrote in message
news:axdak.35719$t44.30775@fe105.usenetserver.com...
| Quote: |
"TimK" <timkozz@cfl.rr.com> wrote in message
news:IsSdnU-dIsHswvTVnZ2dnUVZ_o3inZ2d@giganews.com...
"vernono" <vernono@there.com> wrote in message
news:GKV9k.7481$5y2.1544@fe113.usenetserver.com...
Noah's flood or not, the size of the supposed ark has been shown
feasible over and over.
What an idiotic claim.
You better do some research, but then you are an idiot.
|
I don't need to do any "research" pinhead - I know it's absurd on its face.
It's a stupid idea that only people who knew of a few dozen species could
come up with. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
vernono
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 4:53 am Post subject: Re: More scientific evidence of the flood of the BibleA new |
|
|
"Peter Kelsey" <peter_a_kelseyNO@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:8e-dnXvKZ4G9MvfVnZ2dnUVZ_jqdnZ2d@comcast.com...
| Quote: |
vernono wrote:
"Sam Buckland" <nothing@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:g4e56j$sop$2@registered.motzarella.org...
vernono wrote:
"Sam Buckland" <nothing@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:g4e4p9$sop$1@registered.motzarella.org...
vernono wrote:
"Sam Buckland" <nothing@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:g4due1$tic$1@registered.motzarella.org...
vernono wrote:
"Sam Buckland" <nothing@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:g4dsm6$jm4$1@registered.motzarella.org...
vernono wrote:
"Snowman" <jkelley@zoomnet.net> wrote in message
news:682ae38a-770f-4c22-8d6d-1e556f504477@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
From what I've read,the word translated as "world" in the flood
account is more often used to mean "country" or "reigon".
"World" is a rather unusual translation for it.
That's a very common interpretation. Country or entire region.
It could easily be what was said.
BUT independent of any biblical connection, the entire earth has
been under water several times
Not all at once, it wasn't.
ALL AT ONCE
Nope. Never happened.
Oh, gee you better tell that to the majority of geologists.
Why? They already KNOW it never happened.
The earth STARTED as completely covered in water.
In a word, "bullshit".
No, water.
No, bullshit was correct.
get an education. You have ZERO.
And yet, mine is apparently MUCH better than yours...
Go figure.
Here's another couple.to tax you little brain
Africa, SE Asia and South America were all one continent / island at one
time with no real mountains.
The tallest mountain peak on earth is completely under water.
The Earth and Mars originated at some place other than our solar system.
There is question about the moon.
None of these facts have anything to do with the bible.
Now go play with yourself.
(PLONK)
I can understand why you're running away... he made you look
pretty silly. All you really had left was to change topics and
run away. I mean, you certainly don't have any "facts" or
support!
|
Just common geologic and solar education.
Forget trying to prove something about the bible that no one said.
The atheist religion is the narrowest and made up of the uneducated.
Note: to the dimwits, I said atheist not non-theist. Atheists don't know
the difference.
(PLONK) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Sam Buckland
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 4:56 am Post subject: Re: More scientific evidence of the flood of the BibleA new |
|
|
vernono wrote:
| Quote: |
"Peter Kelsey" <peter_a_kelseyNO@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:8e-dnXvKZ4G9MvfVnZ2dnUVZ_jqdnZ2d@comcast.com...
vernono wrote:
"Sam Buckland" <nothing@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:g4e56j$sop$2@registered.motzarella.org...
vernono wrote:
"Sam Buckland" <nothing@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:g4e4p9$sop$1@registered.motzarella.org...
vernono wrote:
"Sam Buckland" <nothing@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:g4due1$tic$1@registered.motzarella.org...
vernono wrote:
"Sam Buckland" <nothing@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:g4dsm6$jm4$1@registered.motzarella.org...
vernono wrote:
"Snowman" <jkelley@zoomnet.net> wrote in message
news:682ae38a-770f-4c22-8d6d-1e556f504477@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
From what I've read,the word translated as "world" in the flood
account is more often used to mean "country" or "reigon".
"World" is a rather unusual translation for it.
That's a very common interpretation. Country or entire region.
It could easily be what was said.
BUT independent of any biblical connection, the entire earth has
been under water several times
Not all at once, it wasn't.
ALL AT ONCE
Nope. Never happened.
Oh, gee you better tell that to the majority of geologists.
Why? They already KNOW it never happened.
The earth STARTED as completely covered in water.
In a word, "bullshit".
No, water.
No, bullshit was correct.
get an education. You have ZERO.
And yet, mine is apparently MUCH better than yours...
Go figure.
Here's another couple.to tax you little brain
Africa, SE Asia and South America were all one continent / island at one
time with no real mountains.
The tallest mountain peak on earth is completely under water.
The Earth and Mars originated at some place other than our solar system.
There is question about the moon.
None of these facts have anything to do with the bible.
Now go play with yourself.
(PLONK)
I can understand why you're running away... he made you look
pretty silly. All you really had left was to change topics and
run away. I mean, you certainly don't have any "facts" or
support!
Just common geologic and solar education.
|
You have NO evidence and NO support among geologic or
solar scientists. You're an idiot. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Wombat
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 5:03 am Post subject: Re: More scientific evidence of the flood of the BibleA new |
|
|
On 1 Jul, 20:27, "vernono" <vern...@there.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
"Wombat" <tri...@multiweb.nl> wrote in message
news:a344f765-f677-4721-85be-65afa294bc31@8g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On 1 Jul, 11:49, Pastor Dave <ananias917_@_gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 01:19:38 -0700 (PDT), Snowman
jkel...@zoomnet.net> spake thusly:
From what I've read,the word translated as "world" in the flood
account is more often used to mean "country" or "reigon".
"World" is a rather unusual translation for it.
Not true. But rather than get into word arguments,
let me say flat out, that what you are trying to do is
to find a way to compromise with man, because they
claim that you are stupid for believing what you do
and that "science proves you wrong", when no such
thing is true and in reality, you're just too lazy to
find out. And the time when you are "stupid",
is when you take the word of those who claim that
ideas based on an atheistic world view are true
and don't do REAL RESEARCH for yourself!!!
Now like I said, I won't bother with word arguments.
I will simply ask you... If the flood was only regional,
why didn't God just tell Noah to MOVE??? Hello??? :)
So when the gospel states that Caesar Augustus sent out a decree
saying the whole world was to be taxed (Luke 2:1) he was expecting the
civilisations in South America would send in their wack?
Wombat
Cute.
Always watch for context.
|
And the context is?
Wombat
| Quote: |
In my dealings with Nasa astrophysics. I heard several use the terms, four
corners of the earth or four corners of the universe.
At lunch one time someone said " the other side of the moon". Other said, "
there aint no sides."
It led to a full, fun discussion of how should we term- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text - |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Free Lunch
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 5:11 am Post subject: Re: More scientific evidence of the flood of the BibleA new |
|
|
On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 13:34:45 -0700, in alt.talk.creationism
"vernono" <vernono@there.com> wrote in
<Exwak.62579$xd1.44741@fe087.usenetserver.com>:
| Quote: |
"Sam Buckland" <nothing@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:g4due1$tic$1@registered.motzarella.org...
vernono wrote:
"Sam Buckland" <nothing@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:g4dsm6$jm4$1@registered.motzarella.org...
vernono wrote:
"Snowman" <jkelley@zoomnet.net> wrote in message
news:682ae38a-770f-4c22-8d6d-1e556f504477@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
From what I've read,the word translated as "world" in the flood
account is more often used to mean "country" or "reigon".
"World" is a rather unusual translation for it.
That's a very common interpretation. Country or entire region. It
could easily be what was said.
BUT independent of any biblical connection, the entire earth has been
under water several times
Not all at once, it wasn't.
ALL AT ONCE
Nope. Never happened.
Oh, gee you better tell that to the majority of geologists.
The earth STARTED as completely covered in water.
So, why don't you provide a reference to support your claim rather than |
just repeat yourself? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Wombat
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 5:13 am Post subject: Re: More scientific evidence of the flood of the BibleA new |
|
|
On 1 Jul, 20:46, "vernono" <vern...@there.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
"Sam Buckland" <noth...@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:g4dsm6$jm4$1@registered.motzarella.org...
vernono wrote:
"Snowman" <jkel...@zoomnet.net> wrote in message
news:682ae38a-770f-4c22-8d6d-1e556f504477@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com....
From what I've read,the word translated as "world" in the flood
account is more often used to mean "country" or "reigon".
"World" is a rather unusual translation for it.
That's a very common interpretation. Country or entire region. It could
easily be what was said.
BUT independent of any biblical connection, the entire earth has been
under water several times
Not all at once, it wasn't.
ALL AT ONCE
It started as totally under water. It was covered again several times
before the tectonics finally pushed very high mountains and very low spots
in the sea.
|
You have a cite for that claim?
| Quote: |
Did you know that the highest mountain (not highest above sea level) is
under water in the ocean?
|
Not quite accurate. Mauna Kea rises from deep water (circa 19,000
feet) and has 13,796 feet to go when it breaks surface, giving a
total of about 33,000 feet.
If you know of another even bigger, pray tell.
Wombat |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
vernono
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 5:16 am Post subject: Re: More scientific evidence of the flood of the BibleA new |
|
|
"Free Lunch" <lunch@nofreelunch.us> wrote in message
news:8thl64d5lnbr9tb8jld4qhn9lfok538lak@4ax.com...
| Quote: |
On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 13:34:45 -0700, in alt.talk.creationism
"vernono" <vernono@there.com> wrote in
Exwak.62579$xd1.44741@fe087.usenetserver.com>:
"Sam Buckland" <nothing@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:g4due1$tic$1@registered.motzarella.org...
vernono wrote:
"Sam Buckland" <nothing@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:g4dsm6$jm4$1@registered.motzarella.org...
vernono wrote:
"Snowman" <jkelley@zoomnet.net> wrote in message
news:682ae38a-770f-4c22-8d6d-1e556f504477@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
From what I've read,the word translated as "world" in the flood
account is more often used to mean "country" or "reigon".
"World" is a rather unusual translation for it.
That's a very common interpretation. Country or entire region. It
could easily be what was said.
BUT independent of any biblical connection, the entire earth has been
under water several times
Not all at once, it wasn't.
ALL AT ONCE
Nope. Never happened.
Oh, gee you better tell that to the majority of geologists.
The earth STARTED as completely covered in water.
So, why don't you provide a reference to support your claim rather than
just repeat yourself?
|
Geology 101 at almost any University. (Maybe not bible colleges) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Wombat
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 5:16 am Post subject: Re: More scientific evidence of the flood of the BibleA new |
|
|
On 1 Jul, 22:34, "vernono" <vern...@there.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
"Sam Buckland" <noth...@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:g4due1$tic$1@registered.motzarella.org...
vernono wrote:
"Sam Buckland" <noth...@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:g4dsm6$jm4$1@registered.motzarella.org...
vernono wrote:
"Snowman" <jkel...@zoomnet.net> wrote in message
news:682ae38a-770f-4c22-8d6d-1e556f504477@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com....
From what I've read,the word translated as "world" in the flood
account is more often used to mean "country" or "reigon".
"World" is a rather unusual translation for it.
That's a very common interpretation. Country or entire region. It
could easily be what was said.
BUT independent of any biblical connection, the entire earth has been
under water several times
Not all at once, it wasn't.
ALL AT ONCE
Nope. Never happened.
Oh, gee you better tell that to the majority of geologists.
The earth STARTED as completely covered in water.
|
Correction. The Earth started as a molten ball, being bombarded by
comets, asteroids and even a minor planet.
Wombat |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Sam Buckland
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 5:18 am Post subject: Re: More scientific evidence of the flood of the BibleA new |
|
|
Free Lunch wrote:
| Quote: |
On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 13:34:45 -0700, in alt.talk.creationism
"vernono" <vernono@there.com> wrote in
Exwak.62579$xd1.44741@fe087.usenetserver.com>:
"Sam Buckland" <nothing@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:g4due1$tic$1@registered.motzarella.org...
vernono wrote:
"Sam Buckland" <nothing@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:g4dsm6$jm4$1@registered.motzarella.org...
vernono wrote:
"Snowman" <jkelley@zoomnet.net> wrote in message
news:682ae38a-770f-4c22-8d6d-1e556f504477@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
From what I've read,the word translated as "world" in the flood
account is more often used to mean "country" or "reigon".
"World" is a rather unusual translation for it.
That's a very common interpretation. Country or entire region. It
could easily be what was said.
BUT independent of any biblical connection, the entire earth has been
under water several times
Not all at once, it wasn't.
ALL AT ONCE
Nope. Never happened.
Oh, gee you better tell that to the majority of geologists.
The earth STARTED as completely covered in water.
So, why don't you provide a reference to support your claim rather than
just repeat yourself?
|
Because he doesn't HAVE any. He PROBABLY can't even find a "blog" that
supports his idiocy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Free Lunch
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 5:23 am Post subject: Re: More scientific evidence of the flood of the BibleA new |
|
|
On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 17:16:32 -0700, in alt.talk.creationism
"vernono" <vernono@there.com> wrote in
<zNzak.31766$aQ3.586@fe085.usenetserver.com>:
| Quote: |
"Free Lunch" <lunch@nofreelunch.us> wrote in message
news:8thl64d5lnbr9tb8jld4qhn9lfok538lak@4ax.com...
On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 13:34:45 -0700, in alt.talk.creationism
"vernono" <vernono@there.com> wrote in
Exwak.62579$xd1.44741@fe087.usenetserver.com>:
"Sam Buckland" <nothing@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:g4due1$tic$1@registered.motzarella.org...
vernono wrote:
"Sam Buckland" <nothing@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:g4dsm6$jm4$1@registered.motzarella.org...
vernono wrote:
"Snowman" <jkelley@zoomnet.net> wrote in message
news:682ae38a-770f-4c22-8d6d-1e556f504477@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
From what I've read,the word translated as "world" in the flood
account is more often used to mean "country" or "reigon".
"World" is a rather unusual translation for it.
That's a very common interpretation. Country or entire region. It
could easily be what was said.
BUT independent of any biblical connection, the entire earth has been
under water several times
Not all at once, it wasn't.
ALL AT ONCE
Nope. Never happened.
Oh, gee you better tell that to the majority of geologists.
The earth STARTED as completely covered in water.
So, why don't you provide a reference to support your claim rather than
just repeat yourself?
Geology 101 at almost any University. (Maybe not bible colleges)
You know that is not a reference. Try again or we will know that you had |
no idea what you were talking about and told us lies to further your
relgious doctrines. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
vernono
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 5:37 am Post subject: Re: More scientific evidence of the flood of the BibleA new |
|
|
"Free Lunch" <lunch@nofreelunch.us> wrote in message
news:djil641kdau848bu58k674m587sqf4aq8p@4ax.com...
| Quote: |
On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 17:16:32 -0700, in alt.talk.creationism
"vernono" <vernono@there.com> wrote in
zNzak.31766$aQ3.586@fe085.usenetserver.com>:
"Free Lunch" <lunch@nofreelunch.us> wrote in message
news:8thl64d5lnbr9tb8jld4qhn9lfok538lak@4ax.com...
On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 13:34:45 -0700, in alt.talk.creationism
"vernono" <vernono@there.com> wrote in
Exwak.62579$xd1.44741@fe087.usenetserver.com>:
"Sam Buckland" <nothing@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:g4due1$tic$1@registered.motzarella.org...
vernono wrote:
"Sam Buckland" <nothing@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:g4dsm6$jm4$1@registered.motzarella.org...
vernono wrote:
"Snowman" <jkelley@zoomnet.net> wrote in message
news:682ae38a-770f-4c22-8d6d-1e556f504477@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
From what I've read,the word translated as "world" in the flood
account is more often used to mean "country" or "reigon".
"World" is a rather unusual translation for it.
That's a very common interpretation. Country or entire region. It
could easily be what was said.
BUT independent of any biblical connection, the entire earth has
been
under water several times
Not all at once, it wasn't.
ALL AT ONCE
Nope. Never happened.
Oh, gee you better tell that to the majority of geologists.
The earth STARTED as completely covered in water.
So, why don't you provide a reference to support your claim rather than
just repeat yourself?
Geology 101 at almost any University. (Maybe not bible colleges)
You know that is not a reference. Try again or we will know that you had
no idea what you were talking about and told us lies to further your
relgious doctrines.
|
In your total ignorance, you have not noticed that I do not agree with most
interpretations of the bible.
Your religion (atheism) blinds you to that simple little fact. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
vernono
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 5:38 am Post subject: Re: More scientific evidence of the flood of the BibleA new |
|
|
| (PLONK) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
