|
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
vernono
Guest
|
 Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 3:54 am Post subject: Re: More scientific evidence of the flood of the BibleA new |
 |
|
"Ralph" <mmman_90@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:TUaak.17429$Xe.6948@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
| Quote: |
"vernono" <vernono@there.com> wrote in message
news:nB8ak.11888$YQ5.8544@fe103.usenetserver.com...
"John Baker" <nunya@bizniz.net> wrote in message
news:0ngg64ll7cblhn768r411egrb1hu1618f0@4ax.com...
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 17:26:22 -0700, "vernono" <vernono@there.com
wrote:
"Bill M" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:6bV9k.7172$1I.6294@bignews4.bellsouth.net...
There is NO scientifically confirmed evidence of the Noah flood. This
fairy tale has no basis in fact.
Noah and the Ark
The Bible is claimed to be the inerrant word of God
The story of Noah and the flood is only one of many ridiculous
biblical
tales with no authentication or plausibility of any kind. It is an
impossible story.
1. The largest boat ever built to this day could not even come
CLOSE
to housing Noah, his sons, wives and two of every type of animal on
earth.
And this was a boat built of wood many thousands of years ago.
Too bad you have no education and have never researched this before.
As I've asked you before, Vern, and which you always avoid answering,
if *we're* the uneducated ones, why is it always *you* who looks like
a damned fool?
Noah's flood or not, the size of the supposed ark has been shown
feasible
over and over.
Sure it has, Vern. And I'm the King of Norway.
Find out what a species is. DUUUHHH
I know what a species is, Vern. I also know approximately how many of
them live on this planet. And I also know that you'd have a hard time
fitting two of every species into freaking Rhode Island, let alone a
wooden boat roughly half the size of a modern ocean liner.
And yet fools like you still believe that ridiculous story.
And you don't know basic secular geology.
he he he he he he
You have read very little if anything on the subject.
Just what is 'secular' geology, as opposed to what other type of geology?
|
Word of mouth yapping without "STUDYING" or APPLICATION. (Not trying to
prove anything such as you do without ANY facts.)
You DON't know what a species is. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
vernono
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 3:56 am Post subject: Re: More scientific evidence of the flood of the BibleA new |
|
|
"Ken" <flakey714@aol.com> wrote in message
news:e65b1d35-282e-4a7a-98e8-92a7bee7c4b0@e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
On Jun 30, 12:59 pm, "Ralph" <mmman...@yahoo.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
Just what is 'secular' geology, as opposed to what other type of geology?-
Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
|
Also known as "Heads Up One's Ass" geology
Yep he knows that very well..
Making money with real knowledge is very secular. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
vernono
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 3:57 am Post subject: Re: More scientific evidence of the flood of the BibleA new |
|
|
"TimK" <timkozz@cfl.rr.com> wrote in message
news:IsSdnU-dIsHswvTVnZ2dnUVZ_o3inZ2d@giganews.com...
| Quote: |
"vernono" <vernono@there.com> wrote in message
news:GKV9k.7481$5y2.1544@fe113.usenetserver.com...
Noah's flood or not, the size of the supposed ark has been shown feasible
over and over.
What an idiotic claim.
|
You better do some research, but then you are an idiot. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Ken
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 4:03 am Post subject: Re: More scientif.....Aw Crap! |
|
|
On Jun 30, 4:16 pm, Ken <flakey...@aol.com> wrote:Sunnoabitch..
I fucked up and confuzzed secular with theist, mainly because I never
use either term |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Ken
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 4:05 am Post subject: Re: More scientific--aw crap! |
|
|
On Jun 30, 1:11 pm, Ken <flakey...@aol.com> wrote: Sonnoabitch
Dun fucked up again and mixed secular with bible thumper creationist
pseudo-geology |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Ralph
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 5:14 am Post subject: Re: More scientific evidence of the flood of the BibleA new |
|
|
"vernono" <vernono@there.com> wrote in message
news:Prdak.35716$t44.2781@fe105.usenetserver.com...
| Quote: |
"Ralph" <mmman_90@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:EXaak.17430$Xe.9463@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
"vernono" <vernono@there.com> wrote in message
news:stY9k.7492$5y2.2452@fe113.usenetserver.com...
"Ralph" <mmman_90@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:OZV9k.7199$1I.1397@bignews4.bellsouth.net...
"vernono" <vernono@there.com> wrote in message
news:GKV9k.7481$5y2.1544@fe113.usenetserver.com...
"Bill M" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:6bV9k.7172$1I.6294@bignews4.bellsouth.net...
There is NO scientifically confirmed evidence of the Noah flood. This
fairy tale has no basis in fact.
Noah and the Ark
The Bible is claimed to be the inerrant word of God
The story of Noah and the flood is only one of many ridiculous
biblical
tales with no authentication or plausibility of any kind. It is an
impossible story.
1. The largest boat ever built to this day could not even come
CLOSE to housing Noah, his sons, wives and two of every type of
animal
on earth. And this was a boat built of wood many thousands of years
ago.
Too bad you have no education and have never researched this before.
Noah's flood or not, the size of the supposed ark has been shown
feasible over and over.
Find out what a species is. DUUUHHH
Gee Vernon, I've researched it and find the idea of the story of Noah
to
be riddled with physical impossibilities.
No you haven't. you have read anti- bible "stories".
Get over it. You haven't studied plain secular archeology or geology
either.
Now what is 'secular' archeology as opposed to what other type of
archeology? If you call actual science books on geology, physics and
archeology as 'anti-bible stories' I guess you would be right.
You haven't studied ANY. Maybe you think reading a book is studying.
|
I guess my MPA degree and my CPA certification are nothing. Also, my two
years at Georgia Tech were wasted becasue at every institutiob at which I
sdudied we considered reading a book is studying.
| Quote: |
Try working in the field.
The most fun is oil exploration where they have to come up with theories
of how and then prove it with finding.
|
Yes, and oil exploration has led more geologists to dump creation than just
about any other scientific field. The earliest supporters of evolution came
from the oil industry. Many of those, such as Glenn Morton, remain
Christians, they just have the veil of stupidity removed from their heads. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Ralph
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 5:17 am Post subject: Re: More scientific evidence of the flood of the BibleA new |
|
|
"vernono" <vernono@there.com> wrote in message
news:rudak.35717$t44.13134@fe105.usenetserver.com...
| Quote: |
"Ralph" <mmman_90@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:TUaak.17429$Xe.6948@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
"vernono" <vernono@there.com> wrote in message
news:nB8ak.11888$YQ5.8544@fe103.usenetserver.com...
"John Baker" <nunya@bizniz.net> wrote in message
news:0ngg64ll7cblhn768r411egrb1hu1618f0@4ax.com...
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 17:26:22 -0700, "vernono" <vernono@there.com
wrote:
"Bill M" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:6bV9k.7172$1I.6294@bignews4.bellsouth.net...
There is NO scientifically confirmed evidence of the Noah flood. This
fairy tale has no basis in fact.
Noah and the Ark
The Bible is claimed to be the inerrant word of God
The story of Noah and the flood is only one of many ridiculous
biblical
tales with no authentication or plausibility of any kind. It is an
impossible story.
1. The largest boat ever built to this day could not even come
CLOSE
to housing Noah, his sons, wives and two of every type of animal on
earth.
And this was a boat built of wood many thousands of years ago.
Too bad you have no education and have never researched this before.
As I've asked you before, Vern, and which you always avoid answering,
if *we're* the uneducated ones, why is it always *you* who looks like
a damned fool?
Noah's flood or not, the size of the supposed ark has been shown
feasible
over and over.
Sure it has, Vern. And I'm the King of Norway.
Find out what a species is. DUUUHHH
I know what a species is, Vern. I also know approximately how many of
them live on this planet. And I also know that you'd have a hard time
fitting two of every species into freaking Rhode Island, let alone a
wooden boat roughly half the size of a modern ocean liner.
And yet fools like you still believe that ridiculous story.
And you don't know basic secular geology.
he he he he he he
You have read very little if anything on the subject.
Just what is 'secular' geology, as opposed to what other type of geology?
Word of mouth yapping without "STUDYING" or APPLICATION. (Not trying to
prove anything such as you do without ANY facts.)
You DON't know what a species is.
|
The biggest thing I don't know is what 'secular' geology is and I've asked
you twice for an explanation. What type of geology do you compare this
'secular' geology? Don't shuck and jive me Vern, just answer the damn simple
question. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Ralph
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 5:19 am Post subject: Re: More scientific evidence of the flood of the BibleA new |
|
|
"vernono" <vernono@there.com> wrote in message
news:8wdak.35718$t44.17044@fe105.usenetserver.com...
| Quote: |
"Ken" <flakey714@aol.com> wrote in message
news:e65b1d35-282e-4a7a-98e8-92a7bee7c4b0@e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
On Jun 30, 12:59 pm, "Ralph" <mmman...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Just what is 'secular' geology, as opposed to what other type of
geology?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Also known as "Heads Up One's Ass" geology
Yep he knows that very well..
Making money with real knowledge is very secular.
|
Well tell me Vern, how does this Heads Up One's Ass Geology work. Is this
the type practiced by Ken Ham? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Ralph
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 5:21 am Post subject: Re: More scientific evidence of the flood of the BibleA new |
|
|
"TimK" <timkozz@cfl.rr.com> wrote in message
news:IsSdnU-dIsHswvTVnZ2dnUVZ_o3inZ2d@giganews.com...
| Quote: |
"vernono" <vernono@there.com> wrote in message
news:GKV9k.7481$5y2.1544@fe113.usenetserver.com...
Noah's flood or not, the size of the supposed ark has been shown feasible
over and over.
What an idiotic claim.
|
You can say that again. I am reading "Flock of Dodos" and I am splitting my
sides in the flood chapter  )). |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Ralph
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 5:22 am Post subject: Re: More scientific evidence of the flood of the BibleA new |
|
|
"vernono" <vernono@there.com> wrote in message
news:axdak.35719$t44.30775@fe105.usenetserver.com...
| Quote: |
"TimK" <timkozz@cfl.rr.com> wrote in message
news:IsSdnU-dIsHswvTVnZ2dnUVZ_o3inZ2d@giganews.com...
"vernono" <vernono@there.com> wrote in message
news:GKV9k.7481$5y2.1544@fe113.usenetserver.com...
Noah's flood or not, the size of the supposed ark has been shown
feasible over and over.
What an idiotic claim.
You better do some research, but then you are an idiot.
|
Might help you to also do a little research. Try to stay off the creationist
web sites and read one from a scientific point of view. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Cory Albrecht
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 6:28 am Post subject: Re: More scientific evidence of the flood of the BibleA new |
|
|
vernono wrote:
| Quote: |
"Ralph" <mmman_90@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:EXaak.17430$Xe.9463@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
Now what is 'secular' archeology as opposed to what other type of
archeology? If you call actual science books on geology, physics and
archeology as 'anti-bible stories' I guess you would be right.
You haven't studied ANY. Maybe you think reading a book is studying.
Try working in the field.
The most fun is oil exploration where they have to come up with theories of
how and then prove it with finding.
|
Go for it. Show us all this evidence that the Noachian Flood happened.
Give us the cites to reputable geology journals which how us the science
of the Flood. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Snowman
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 8:19 am Post subject: Re: More scientific evidence of the flood of the BibleA new |
|
|
From what I've read,the word translated as "world" in the flood
account is more often used to mean "country" or "reigon".
"World" is a rather unusual translation for it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
vernono
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 10:07 am Post subject: Re: More scientific evidence of the flood of the BibleA new |
|
|
"John Baker" <nunya@bizniz.net> wrote in message
news:svmi64prrnh6bu7ao4kcnjo6hc865efcv5@4ax.com...
| Quote: |
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:17:18 -0400, "Ralph" <mmman_90@yahoo.com
wrote:
"vernono" <vernono@there.com> wrote in message
news:rudak.35717$t44.13134@fe105.usenetserver.com...
"Ralph" <mmman_90@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:TUaak.17429$Xe.6948@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
"vernono" <vernono@there.com> wrote in message
news:nB8ak.11888$YQ5.8544@fe103.usenetserver.com...
"John Baker" <nunya@bizniz.net> wrote in message
news:0ngg64ll7cblhn768r411egrb1hu1618f0@4ax.com...
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 17:26:22 -0700, "vernono" <vernono@there.com
wrote:
"Bill M" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:6bV9k.7172$1I.6294@bignews4.bellsouth.net...
There is NO scientifically confirmed evidence of the Noah flood.
This
fairy tale has no basis in fact.
Noah and the Ark
The Bible is claimed to be the inerrant word of God
The story of Noah and the flood is only one of many ridiculous
biblical
tales with no authentication or plausibility of any kind. It is an
impossible story.
1. The largest boat ever built to this day could not even come
CLOSE
to housing Noah, his sons, wives and two of every type of animal on
earth.
And this was a boat built of wood many thousands of years ago.
Too bad you have no education and have never researched this before.
As I've asked you before, Vern, and which you always avoid answering,
if *we're* the uneducated ones, why is it always *you* who looks like
a damned fool?
Noah's flood or not, the size of the supposed ark has been shown
feasible
over and over.
Sure it has, Vern. And I'm the King of Norway.
Find out what a species is. DUUUHHH
I know what a species is, Vern. I also know approximately how many of
them live on this planet. And I also know that you'd have a hard time
fitting two of every species into freaking Rhode Island, let alone a
wooden boat roughly half the size of a modern ocean liner.
And yet fools like you still believe that ridiculous story.
And you don't know basic secular geology.
he he he he he he
You have read very little if anything on the subject.
Just what is 'secular' geology, as opposed to what other type of
geology?
Word of mouth yapping without "STUDYING" or APPLICATION. (Not trying
to
prove anything such as you do without ANY facts.)
You DON't know what a species is.
The biggest thing I don't know is what 'secular' geology is
Anything that claims the flood never happened and/or that the planet
is more than c. 6,000 years old. <G
|
And your ignorance says that the bible says that the earth is 6000 years
old.
IF you had an education you would know that several occurances occured
around 6000 years ago.
I'm sure you know when the earth stood still (to the people).
I'll give you a clue. When did the earth switch from 23 deg one way to 23
degrees the other. I'm sure you knew about that he he he he he he he.
Oh, secular means no religious influence of the theories. Oh, darn, geology
has theories?
| Quote: |
and I've asked
you twice for an explanation. What type of geology do you compare this
'secular' geology? Don't shuck and jive me Vern, just answer the damn
simple
question.
|
I've explained and you still don't know.
Tell us all what the dominant theory is that produced the shale and oil in
the high plains.
Tell us all why the cliffs of the Mississippi don't match the commonly
accepted geological strata.
Nothing to do with religion except to some Indians. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
vernono
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 10:09 am Post subject: Re: More scientific evidence of the flood of the BibleA new |
|
|
"harry k" <turnkey4099@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:7367e04d-e6da-49c6-b349-7681c5618cf6@l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On Jun 30, 10:20 am, "vernono" <vern...@there.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
"John Baker" <nu...@bizniz.net> wrote in message
news:0ngg64ll7cblhn768r411egrb1hu1618f0@4ax.com...
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 17:26:22 -0700, "vernono" <vern...@there.com
wrote:
"Bill M" <wm...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:6bV9k.7172$1I.6294@bignews4.bellsouth.net...
There is NO scientifically confirmed evidence of the Noah flood. This
fairy tale has no basis in fact.
Noah and the Ark
The Bible is claimed to be the inerrant word of God
The story of Noah and the flood is only one of many ridiculous
biblical
tales with no authentication or plausibility of any kind. It is an
impossible story.
1. The largest boat ever built to this day could not even come CLOSE
to housing Noah, his sons, wives and two of every type of animal on
earth.
And this was a boat built of wood many thousands of years ago.
Too bad you have no education and have never researched this before.
As I've asked you before, Vern, and which you always avoid answering,
if *we're* the uneducated ones, why is it always *you* who looks like
a damned fool?
Noah's flood or not, the size of the supposed ark has been shown
feasible
over and over.
Sure it has, Vern. And I'm the King of Norway.
Find out what a species is. DUUUHHH
I know what a species is, Vern. I also know approximately how many of
them live on this planet. And I also know that you'd have a hard time
fitting two of every species into freaking Rhode Island, let alone a
wooden boat roughly half the size of a modern ocean liner.
And yet fools like you still believe that ridiculous story.
And you don't know basic secular geology.
he he he he he he
You have read very little if anything on the subject.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
|
I'm willing to give it a try. How about giving us a cite for just one
"secular geology" text?
Harry K
IF you were willing OR intelligent enough to understand, you would have long
ago found many sites. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
vernono
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 10:11 am Post subject: Re: More scientific evidence of the flood of the BibleA new |
|
|
"Bill M" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:DReak.24901$s77.3850@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
| Quote: |
"vernono" <vernono@there.com> wrote in message
news:yz8ak.11887$YQ5.7651@fe103.usenetserver.com...
"John Baker" <nunya@bizniz.net> wrote in message
news:tggg641kcjtornlfvfsdqden2b01ss2to9@4ax.com...
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 20:32:48 -0700, "vernono" <vernono@there.com
wrote:
"Ralph" <mmman_90@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:OZV9k.7199$1I.1397@bignews4.bellsouth.net...
"vernono" <vernono@there.com> wrote in message
news:GKV9k.7481$5y2.1544@fe113.usenetserver.com...
"Bill M" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:6bV9k.7172$1I.6294@bignews4.bellsouth.net...
There is NO scientifically confirmed evidence of the Noah flood.
This
fairy tale has no basis in fact.
Noah and the Ark
The Bible is claimed to be the inerrant word of God
The story of Noah and the flood is only one of many ridiculous
biblical
tales with no authentication or plausibility of any kind. It is an
impossible story.
1. The largest boat ever built to this day could not even come
CLOSE
to housing Noah, his sons, wives and two of every type of animal on
earth. And this was a boat built of wood many thousands of years
ago.
Too bad you have no education and have never researched this before.
Noah's flood or not, the size of the supposed ark has been shown
feasible
over and over.
Find out what a species is. DUUUHHH
Gee Vernon, I've researched it and find the idea of the story of Noah
to
be riddled with physical impossibilities.
No you haven't. you have read anti- bible "stories".
Get over it. You haven't studied plain secular archeology or geology
either.
Suppose you "educate" us then, moron.
Come on, Vern. Put your money where your big, fat, stupid mouth is.
Show us how the flood story is in any way compatible with what we know
of physics. Prove it's anything other than a Bronze Age fairy tale.
Ten bucks says you can't even begin to.
I already did provide several instances which could be carried on.
Study geology first.
No no, learn to read first.
Another typical religous fanatic that keeps making nonsensical claims with
NO evidence to support them.
|
The uneducated always claim the other is based on religion. Thank you for
identifying yourself. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
