Science Talk
Science Talk
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Forums
Science Forums
Biology
Math
Astronomy
Physics
Technology
Chemistry
Social Sciences
History
Psychology
Philosophy
Sociology
Linguistics
Religious Studies
Economics
Man Woman Ethno
Ask an Expert
World Records
Society Issues
Education
People
Alternative Science
More scientific evidence of the flood of the BibleA new stud
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Science Talk Forum Index -> Creationism
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
vernono
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 10:20 pm    Post subject: Re: More scientific evidence of the flood of the BibleA new Reply with quote

"John Baker" <nunya@bizniz.net> wrote in message
news:0ngg64ll7cblhn768r411egrb1hu1618f0@4ax.com...
Quote:
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 17:26:22 -0700, "vernono" <vernono@there.com
wrote:


"Bill M" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:6bV9k.7172$1I.6294@bignews4.bellsouth.net...
There is NO scientifically confirmed evidence of the Noah flood. This
fairy tale has no basis in fact.

Noah and the Ark

The Bible is claimed to be the inerrant word of God

The story of Noah and the flood is only one of many ridiculous biblical
tales with no authentication or plausibility of any kind. It is an
impossible story.

1. The largest boat ever built to this day could not even come CLOSE
to housing Noah, his sons, wives and two of every type of animal on
earth.
And this was a boat built of wood many thousands of years ago.

Too bad you have no education and have never researched this before.

As I've asked you before, Vern, and which you always avoid answering,
if *we're* the uneducated ones, why is it always *you* who looks like
a damned fool?


Noah's flood or not, the size of the supposed ark has been shown feasible
over and over.

Sure it has, Vern. And I'm the King of Norway.


Find out what a species is. DUUUHHH

I know what a species is, Vern. I also know approximately how many of
them live on this planet. And I also know that you'd have a hard time
fitting two of every species into freaking Rhode Island, let alone a
wooden boat roughly half the size of a modern ocean liner.

And yet fools like you still believe that ridiculous story.


And you don't know basic secular geology.

he he he he he he

You have read very little if anything on the subject.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


John Baker
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 10:53 pm    Post subject: Re: More scientific evidence of the flood of the BibleA new Reply with quote

On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 10:20:28 -0700, "vernono" <vernono@there.com>
wrote:

Quote:

"John Baker" <nunya@bizniz.net> wrote in message
news:0ngg64ll7cblhn768r411egrb1hu1618f0@4ax.com...
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 17:26:22 -0700, "vernono" <vernono@there.com
wrote:


"Bill M" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:6bV9k.7172$1I.6294@bignews4.bellsouth.net...
There is NO scientifically confirmed evidence of the Noah flood. This
fairy tale has no basis in fact.

Noah and the Ark

The Bible is claimed to be the inerrant word of God

The story of Noah and the flood is only one of many ridiculous biblical
tales with no authentication or plausibility of any kind. It is an
impossible story.

1. The largest boat ever built to this day could not even come CLOSE
to housing Noah, his sons, wives and two of every type of animal on
earth.
And this was a boat built of wood many thousands of years ago.

Too bad you have no education and have never researched this before.

As I've asked you before, Vern, and which you always avoid answering,
if *we're* the uneducated ones, why is it always *you* who looks like
a damned fool?

Still no answer, Vern? Why am I not surprised?

Quote:


Noah's flood or not, the size of the supposed ark has been shown feasible
over and over.

Sure it has, Vern. And I'm the King of Norway.


Find out what a species is. DUUUHHH

I know what a species is, Vern. I also know approximately how many of
them live on this planet. And I also know that you'd have a hard time
fitting two of every species into freaking Rhode Island, let alone a
wooden boat roughly half the size of a modern ocean liner.

And yet fools like you still believe that ridiculous story.


And you don't know basic secular geology.

I know enough geology to know that there's not the slightest trace of
evidence for a global flood at *any* time in the planet's history,
much less only around 4,000 years ago.

And what, pray tell, does geology have to do with how many species
currently occupy this planet, and whether or not anyone but a complete
and utter imbecile such as yourself would actually believe you could
fit them all onto a wooden boat 600 feet long at most?

Quote:

he he he he he he

"he he he...."? What are you, fucking twelve?

Quote:

You have read very little if anything on the subject.

Pretty lame attempt to avoid the issue, Vern. But then, you're an
idiot. Lameness is all I expect from you.





>
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Ken
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 11:16 pm    Post subject: Re: More scientific evidence of the flood of the BibleA new Reply with quote

On Jun 30, 1:02 pm, "Ralph" <mmman...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Quote:
"vernono" <vern...@there.com> wrote in message

news:stY9k.7492$5y2.2452@fe113.usenetserver.com...







"Ralph" <mmman...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:OZV9k.7199$1I.1397@bignews4.bellsouth.net...

"vernono" <vern...@there.com> wrote in message
news:GKV9k.7481$5y2.1544@fe113.usenetserver.com...

"Bill M" <wm...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:6bV9k.7172$1I.6294@bignews4.bellsouth.net...
There is NO scientifically confirmed evidence of the Noah flood. This
fairy tale has no basis in fact.

Noah and the Ark

The Bible is claimed to be the inerrant word of God

The story of Noah and the flood is only one of many ridiculous biblical
tales with no authentication or plausibility of any kind. It is an
impossible story.

1.     The largest boat ever built to this day could not even come
CLOSE to housing Noah, his sons, wives and two of every type of animal
on earth. And this was a boat built of wood many thousands of years
ago.

Too bad you have no education and have never researched this before.

Noah's flood or not, the size of the supposed ark has been shown
feasible over and over.

Find out what a species is.   DUUUHHH

Gee Vernon, I've researched it and find the idea of the story of Noah to
be riddled with physical impossibilities.

No you haven't.  you have read anti- bible "stories".

Get over it. You haven't studied plain secular archeology or geology
either.

Now what is 'secular' archeology as opposed to what other type of
archeology? If you call actual science books on geology, physics and
archeology as 'anti-bible stories' I guess you would be right.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

"Secular Archeology" also known as "Head Up Their Ass Archeology"
which is closely related to Secular Stupidity and seen all too often
in here from various creatioNUTs
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Bill M
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 12:27 am    Post subject: Re: More scientific evidence of the flood of the BibleA new Reply with quote

"vernono" <vernono@there.com> wrote in message
news:yz8ak.11887$YQ5.7651@fe103.usenetserver.com...
Quote:

"John Baker" <nunya@bizniz.net> wrote in message
news:tggg641kcjtornlfvfsdqden2b01ss2to9@4ax.com...
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 20:32:48 -0700, "vernono" <vernono@there.com
wrote:


"Ralph" <mmman_90@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:OZV9k.7199$1I.1397@bignews4.bellsouth.net...

"vernono" <vernono@there.com> wrote in message
news:GKV9k.7481$5y2.1544@fe113.usenetserver.com...

"Bill M" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:6bV9k.7172$1I.6294@bignews4.bellsouth.net...
There is NO scientifically confirmed evidence of the Noah flood. This
fairy tale has no basis in fact.

Noah and the Ark

The Bible is claimed to be the inerrant word of God

The story of Noah and the flood is only one of many ridiculous
biblical
tales with no authentication or plausibility of any kind. It is an
impossible story.

1. The largest boat ever built to this day could not even come
CLOSE
to housing Noah, his sons, wives and two of every type of animal on
earth. And this was a boat built of wood many thousands of years ago.

Too bad you have no education and have never researched this before.

Noah's flood or not, the size of the supposed ark has been shown
feasible
over and over.

Find out what a species is. DUUUHHH

Gee Vernon, I've researched it and find the idea of the story of Noah
to
be riddled with physical impossibilities.


No you haven't. you have read anti- bible "stories".

Get over it. You haven't studied plain secular archeology or geology
either.

Suppose you "educate" us then, moron.

Come on, Vern. Put your money where your big, fat, stupid mouth is.
Show us how the flood story is in any way compatible with what we know
of physics. Prove it's anything other than a Bronze Age fairy tale.

Ten bucks says you can't even begin to.


I already did provide several instances which could be carried on.
Study geology first.

No no, learn to read first.

Another typical religous fanatic that keeps making nonsensical claims with
NO evidence to support them.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Bill M
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 12:33 am    Post subject: Re: More scientific evidence of the flood of the BibleA new Reply with quote

"vernono" <vernono@there.com> wrote in message
news:axdak.35719$t44.30775@fe105.usenetserver.com...
Quote:

"TimK" <timkozz@cfl.rr.com> wrote in message
news:IsSdnU-dIsHswvTVnZ2dnUVZ_o3inZ2d@giganews.com...

"vernono" <vernono@there.com> wrote in message
news:GKV9k.7481$5y2.1544@fe113.usenetserver.com...

Noah's flood or not, the size of the supposed ark has been shown
feasible over and over.

What an idiotic claim.



You better do some research, but then you are an idiot.

Still unable to supply ANY objective everifiable evidence to support your
idiotic claims!

Get an education before you try to engage people who have offered facts.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Ralph
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 12:59 am    Post subject: Re: More scientific evidence of the flood of the BibleA new Reply with quote

"vernono" <vernono@there.com> wrote in message
news:nB8ak.11888$YQ5.8544@fe103.usenetserver.com...
Quote:

"John Baker" <nunya@bizniz.net> wrote in message
news:0ngg64ll7cblhn768r411egrb1hu1618f0@4ax.com...
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 17:26:22 -0700, "vernono" <vernono@there.com
wrote:


"Bill M" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:6bV9k.7172$1I.6294@bignews4.bellsouth.net...
There is NO scientifically confirmed evidence of the Noah flood. This
fairy tale has no basis in fact.

Noah and the Ark

The Bible is claimed to be the inerrant word of God

The story of Noah and the flood is only one of many ridiculous biblical
tales with no authentication or plausibility of any kind. It is an
impossible story.

1. The largest boat ever built to this day could not even come
CLOSE
to housing Noah, his sons, wives and two of every type of animal on
earth.
And this was a boat built of wood many thousands of years ago.

Too bad you have no education and have never researched this before.

As I've asked you before, Vern, and which you always avoid answering,
if *we're* the uneducated ones, why is it always *you* who looks like
a damned fool?


Noah's flood or not, the size of the supposed ark has been shown feasible
over and over.

Sure it has, Vern. And I'm the King of Norway.


Find out what a species is. DUUUHHH

I know what a species is, Vern. I also know approximately how many of
them live on this planet. And I also know that you'd have a hard time
fitting two of every species into freaking Rhode Island, let alone a
wooden boat roughly half the size of a modern ocean liner.

And yet fools like you still believe that ridiculous story.


And you don't know basic secular geology.

he he he he he he

You have read very little if anything on the subject.

Just what is 'secular' geology, as opposed to what other type of geology?
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Ralph
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 1:02 am    Post subject: Re: More scientific evidence of the flood of the BibleA new Reply with quote

"vernono" <vernono@there.com> wrote in message
news:stY9k.7492$5y2.2452@fe113.usenetserver.com...
Quote:

"Ralph" <mmman_90@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:OZV9k.7199$1I.1397@bignews4.bellsouth.net...

"vernono" <vernono@there.com> wrote in message
news:GKV9k.7481$5y2.1544@fe113.usenetserver.com...

"Bill M" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:6bV9k.7172$1I.6294@bignews4.bellsouth.net...
There is NO scientifically confirmed evidence of the Noah flood. This
fairy tale has no basis in fact.

Noah and the Ark

The Bible is claimed to be the inerrant word of God

The story of Noah and the flood is only one of many ridiculous biblical
tales with no authentication or plausibility of any kind. It is an
impossible story.

1. The largest boat ever built to this day could not even come
CLOSE to housing Noah, his sons, wives and two of every type of animal
on earth. And this was a boat built of wood many thousands of years
ago.

Too bad you have no education and have never researched this before.

Noah's flood or not, the size of the supposed ark has been shown
feasible over and over.

Find out what a species is. DUUUHHH

Gee Vernon, I've researched it and find the idea of the story of Noah to
be riddled with physical impossibilities.


No you haven't. you have read anti- bible "stories".

Get over it. You haven't studied plain secular archeology or geology
either.

Now what is 'secular' archeology as opposed to what other type of
archeology? If you call actual science books on geology, physics and
archeology as 'anti-bible stories' I guess you would be right.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


John Baker
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 3:22 am    Post subject: Re: More scientific evidence of the flood of the BibleA new Reply with quote

On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:17:18 -0400, "Ralph" <mmman_90@yahoo.com>
wrote:

Quote:

"vernono" <vernono@there.com> wrote in message
news:rudak.35717$t44.13134@fe105.usenetserver.com...

"Ralph" <mmman_90@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:TUaak.17429$Xe.6948@bignews1.bellsouth.net...

"vernono" <vernono@there.com> wrote in message
news:nB8ak.11888$YQ5.8544@fe103.usenetserver.com...

"John Baker" <nunya@bizniz.net> wrote in message
news:0ngg64ll7cblhn768r411egrb1hu1618f0@4ax.com...
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 17:26:22 -0700, "vernono" <vernono@there.com
wrote:


"Bill M" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:6bV9k.7172$1I.6294@bignews4.bellsouth.net...
There is NO scientifically confirmed evidence of the Noah flood. This
fairy tale has no basis in fact.

Noah and the Ark

The Bible is claimed to be the inerrant word of God

The story of Noah and the flood is only one of many ridiculous
biblical
tales with no authentication or plausibility of any kind. It is an
impossible story.

1. The largest boat ever built to this day could not even come
CLOSE
to housing Noah, his sons, wives and two of every type of animal on
earth.
And this was a boat built of wood many thousands of years ago.

Too bad you have no education and have never researched this before.

As I've asked you before, Vern, and which you always avoid answering,
if *we're* the uneducated ones, why is it always *you* who looks like
a damned fool?


Noah's flood or not, the size of the supposed ark has been shown
feasible
over and over.

Sure it has, Vern. And I'm the King of Norway.


Find out what a species is. DUUUHHH

I know what a species is, Vern. I also know approximately how many of
them live on this planet. And I also know that you'd have a hard time
fitting two of every species into freaking Rhode Island, let alone a
wooden boat roughly half the size of a modern ocean liner.

And yet fools like you still believe that ridiculous story.


And you don't know basic secular geology.

he he he he he he

You have read very little if anything on the subject.

Just what is 'secular' geology, as opposed to what other type of geology?



Word of mouth yapping without "STUDYING" or APPLICATION. (Not trying to
prove anything such as you do without ANY facts.)

You DON't know what a species is.

The biggest thing I don't know is what 'secular' geology is

Anything that claims the flood never happened and/or that the planet
is more than c. 6,000 years old. <G>

Quote:
and I've asked
you twice for an explanation. What type of geology do you compare this
'secular' geology? Don't shuck and jive me Vern, just answer the damn simple
question.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


John Baker
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 3:30 am    Post subject: Re: More scientific evidence of the flood of the BibleA new Reply with quote

On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 10:18:31 -0700, "vernono" <vernono@there.com>
wrote:

Quote:

"John Baker" <nunya@bizniz.net> wrote in message
news:tggg641kcjtornlfvfsdqden2b01ss2to9@4ax.com...
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 20:32:48 -0700, "vernono" <vernono@there.com
wrote:


"Ralph" <mmman_90@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:OZV9k.7199$1I.1397@bignews4.bellsouth.net...

"vernono" <vernono@there.com> wrote in message
news:GKV9k.7481$5y2.1544@fe113.usenetserver.com...

"Bill M" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:6bV9k.7172$1I.6294@bignews4.bellsouth.net...
There is NO scientifically confirmed evidence of the Noah flood. This
fairy tale has no basis in fact.

Noah and the Ark

The Bible is claimed to be the inerrant word of God

The story of Noah and the flood is only one of many ridiculous
biblical
tales with no authentication or plausibility of any kind. It is an
impossible story.

1. The largest boat ever built to this day could not even come
CLOSE
to housing Noah, his sons, wives and two of every type of animal on
earth. And this was a boat built of wood many thousands of years ago.

Too bad you have no education and have never researched this before.

Noah's flood or not, the size of the supposed ark has been shown
feasible
over and over.

Find out what a species is. DUUUHHH

Gee Vernon, I've researched it and find the idea of the story of Noah to
be riddled with physical impossibilities.


No you haven't. you have read anti- bible "stories".

Get over it. You haven't studied plain secular archeology or geology
either.

Suppose you "educate" us then, moron.

Come on, Vern. Put your money where your big, fat, stupid mouth is.
Show us how the flood story is in any way compatible with what we know
of physics. Prove it's anything other than a Bronze Age fairy tale.

Ten bucks says you can't even begin to.


I already did provide several instances which could be carried on.
Study geology first.

Ummm... no you didn't, Vern. All you did was make bullshit claims with
nothing to back them up. Just like you always do.

Quote:

No no, learn to read first.

It's a virtual certainty that my reading comprehension is several
orders of magnitude higher than yours, Vern, old son.

Now, when are you going to stop these pathetically lame attempts at
avoid the issue and start answering some fucking questions, moron?


>
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


harry k
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 3:32 am    Post subject: Re: More scientific evidence of the flood of the BibleA new Reply with quote

On Jun 30, 10:20 am, "vernono" <vern...@there.com> wrote:
Quote:
"John Baker" <nu...@bizniz.net> wrote in message

news:0ngg64ll7cblhn768r411egrb1hu1618f0@4ax.com...





On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 17:26:22 -0700, "vernono" <vern...@there.com
wrote:

"Bill M" <wm...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:6bV9k.7172$1I.6294@bignews4.bellsouth.net...
There is NO scientifically confirmed evidence of the Noah flood. This
fairy tale has no basis in fact.

Noah and the Ark

The Bible is claimed to be the inerrant word of God

The story of Noah and the flood is only one of many ridiculous biblical
tales with no authentication or plausibility of any kind. It is an
impossible story.

1.     The largest boat ever built to this day could not even come CLOSE
to housing Noah, his sons, wives and two of every type of animal on
earth.
And this was a boat built of wood many thousands of years ago.

Too bad you have no education and have never researched this before.

As I've asked you before, Vern, and which you always avoid answering,
if *we're* the uneducated ones, why is it always *you* who looks like
a damned fool?

Noah's flood or not, the size of the supposed ark has been shown feasible
over and over.

Sure it has, Vern. And I'm the King of Norway.

Find out what a species is.   DUUUHHH

I know what a species is, Vern. I also know approximately how many of
them live on this planet. And I also know that you'd have a hard time
fitting two of every species into freaking Rhode Island, let alone a
wooden boat roughly half the size of a modern ocean liner.

And yet fools like you still believe that ridiculous story.

And you don't know basic secular geology.

he he he he he he

You have read very little if anything on the subject.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I'm willing to give it a try. How about giving us a cite for just one
"secular geology" text?

Harry K
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


John Baker
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 3:33 am    Post subject: Re: More scientific evidence of the flood of the BibleA new Reply with quote

On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:27:39 +0100, "Bill M" <wmech@bellsouth.net>
wrote:

Quote:

"vernono" <vernono@there.com> wrote in message
news:yz8ak.11887$YQ5.7651@fe103.usenetserver.com...

"John Baker" <nunya@bizniz.net> wrote in message
news:tggg641kcjtornlfvfsdqden2b01ss2to9@4ax.com...
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 20:32:48 -0700, "vernono" <vernono@there.com
wrote:


"Ralph" <mmman_90@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:OZV9k.7199$1I.1397@bignews4.bellsouth.net...

"vernono" <vernono@there.com> wrote in message
news:GKV9k.7481$5y2.1544@fe113.usenetserver.com...

"Bill M" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:6bV9k.7172$1I.6294@bignews4.bellsouth.net...
There is NO scientifically confirmed evidence of the Noah flood. This
fairy tale has no basis in fact.

Noah and the Ark

The Bible is claimed to be the inerrant word of God

The story of Noah and the flood is only one of many ridiculous
biblical
tales with no authentication or plausibility of any kind. It is an
impossible story.

1. The largest boat ever built to this day could not even come
CLOSE
to housing Noah, his sons, wives and two of every type of animal on
earth. And this was a boat built of wood many thousands of years ago.

Too bad you have no education and have never researched this before.

Noah's flood or not, the size of the supposed ark has been shown
feasible
over and over.

Find out what a species is. DUUUHHH

Gee Vernon, I've researched it and find the idea of the story of Noah
to
be riddled with physical impossibilities.


No you haven't. you have read anti- bible "stories".

Get over it. You haven't studied plain secular archeology or geology
either.

Suppose you "educate" us then, moron.

Come on, Vern. Put your money where your big, fat, stupid mouth is.
Show us how the flood story is in any way compatible with what we know
of physics. Prove it's anything other than a Bronze Age fairy tale.

Ten bucks says you can't even begin to.


I already did provide several instances which could be carried on.
Study geology first.

No no, learn to read first.

Another typical religous fanatic that keeps making nonsensical claims with
NO evidence to support them.

Not quite typical. Even most religious fanatics are geniuses compared
to Vern. <G>


>
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


harry k
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 3:33 am    Post subject: Re: More scientific evidence of the flood of the BibleA new Reply with quote

On Jun 30, 3:54 pm, "vernono" <vern...@there.com> wrote:
Quote:
"Ralph" <mmman...@yahoo.com> wrote in message

news:TUaak.17429$Xe.6948@bignews1.bellsouth.net...







"vernono" <vern...@there.com> wrote in message
news:nB8ak.11888$YQ5.8544@fe103.usenetserver.com...

"John Baker" <nu...@bizniz.net> wrote in message
news:0ngg64ll7cblhn768r411egrb1hu1618f0@4ax.com...
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 17:26:22 -0700, "vernono" <vern...@there.com
wrote:

"Bill M" <wm...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:6bV9k.7172$1I.6294@bignews4.bellsouth.net...
There is NO scientifically confirmed evidence of the Noah flood. This
fairy tale has no basis in fact.

Noah and the Ark

The Bible is claimed to be the inerrant word of God

The story of Noah and the flood is only one of many ridiculous
biblical
tales with no authentication or plausibility of any kind. It is an
impossible story.

1.     The largest boat ever built to this day could not even come
CLOSE
to housing Noah, his sons, wives and two of every type of animal on
earth.
And this was a boat built of wood many thousands of years ago.

Too bad you have no education and have never researched this before.

As I've asked you before, Vern, and which you always avoid answering,
if *we're* the uneducated ones, why is it always *you* who looks like
a damned fool?

Noah's flood or not, the size of the supposed ark has been shown
feasible
over and over.

Sure it has, Vern. And I'm the King of Norway.

Find out what a species is.   DUUUHHH

I know what a species is, Vern. I also know approximately how many of
them live on this planet. And I also know that you'd have a hard time
fitting two of every species into freaking Rhode Island, let alone a
wooden boat roughly half the size of a modern ocean liner.

And yet fools like you still believe that ridiculous story.

And you don't know basic secular geology.

he he he he he he

You have read very little if anything on the subject.

Just what is 'secular' geology, as opposed to what other type of geology?

Word of mouth yapping without "STUDYING" or APPLICATION.   (Not trying to
prove anything such as you do without ANY facts.)

You DON't know what a species is.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

So educate us. Give us a cite that defines 'species"

Harry K
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


TimK
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 3:34 am    Post subject: Re: More scientific evidence of the flood of the BibleA new Reply with quote

"vernono" <vernono@there.com> wrote in message
news:GKV9k.7481$5y2.1544@fe113.usenetserver.com...

Quote:
Noah's flood or not, the size of the supposed ark has been shown feasible
over and over.

What an idiotic claim.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


TimK
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 3:35 am    Post subject: Re: More scientific evidence of the flood of the BibleA new Reply with quote

"vernono" <vernono@there.com> wrote in message
news:nB8ak.11888$YQ5.8544@fe103.usenetserver.com...
Quote:

"John Baker" <nunya@bizniz.net> wrote in message
news:0ngg64ll7cblhn768r411egrb1hu1618f0@4ax.com...
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 17:26:22 -0700, "vernono" <vernono@there.com
wrote:


"Bill M" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:6bV9k.7172$1I.6294@bignews4.bellsouth.net...
There is NO scientifically confirmed evidence of the Noah flood. This
fairy tale has no basis in fact.

Noah and the Ark

The Bible is claimed to be the inerrant word of God

The story of Noah and the flood is only one of many ridiculous biblical
tales with no authentication or plausibility of any kind. It is an
impossible story.

1. The largest boat ever built to this day could not even come
CLOSE
to housing Noah, his sons, wives and two of every type of animal on
earth.
And this was a boat built of wood many thousands of years ago.

Too bad you have no education and have never researched this before.

As I've asked you before, Vern, and which you always avoid answering,
if *we're* the uneducated ones, why is it always *you* who looks like
a damned fool?


Noah's flood or not, the size of the supposed ark has been shown feasible
over and over.

Sure it has, Vern. And I'm the King of Norway.


Find out what a species is. DUUUHHH

I know what a species is, Vern. I also know approximately how many of
them live on this planet. And I also know that you'd have a hard time
fitting two of every species into freaking Rhode Island, let alone a
wooden boat roughly half the size of a modern ocean liner.

And yet fools like you still believe that ridiculous story.


And you don't know basic secular geology.

he he he he he he

You have read very little if anything on the subject.

Way to change the subject.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


vernono
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 3:51 am    Post subject: Re: More scientific evidence of the flood of the BibleA new Reply with quote

"Ralph" <mmman_90@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:EXaak.17430$Xe.9463@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
Quote:

"vernono" <vernono@there.com> wrote in message
news:stY9k.7492$5y2.2452@fe113.usenetserver.com...

"Ralph" <mmman_90@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:OZV9k.7199$1I.1397@bignews4.bellsouth.net...

"vernono" <vernono@there.com> wrote in message
news:GKV9k.7481$5y2.1544@fe113.usenetserver.com...

"Bill M" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:6bV9k.7172$1I.6294@bignews4.bellsouth.net...
There is NO scientifically confirmed evidence of the Noah flood. This
fairy tale has no basis in fact.

Noah and the Ark

The Bible is claimed to be the inerrant word of God

The story of Noah and the flood is only one of many ridiculous
biblical
tales with no authentication or plausibility of any kind. It is an
impossible story.

1. The largest boat ever built to this day could not even come
CLOSE to housing Noah, his sons, wives and two of every type of animal
on earth. And this was a boat built of wood many thousands of years
ago.

Too bad you have no education and have never researched this before.

Noah's flood or not, the size of the supposed ark has been shown
feasible over and over.

Find out what a species is. DUUUHHH

Gee Vernon, I've researched it and find the idea of the story of Noah to
be riddled with physical impossibilities.


No you haven't. you have read anti- bible "stories".

Get over it. You haven't studied plain secular archeology or geology
either.

Now what is 'secular' archeology as opposed to what other type of
archeology? If you call actual science books on geology, physics and
archeology as 'anti-bible stories' I guess you would be right.


You haven't studied ANY. Maybe you think reading a book is studying.
Try working in the field.
The most fun is oil exploration where they have to come up with theories of
how and then prove it with finding.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Science Talk Forum Index -> Creationism All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Page 2 of 7

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Australian Debt Consolidation Experts
medical insurance
Wedding Websites
Reviews of portal sites for escorts (incall/outcall)
Swingers in Europe
Used Cars
cheap mortgages
Make Your Own Website
Cheap calls to Poland
Long island Cleaning service
black mold
UK Swingers Genuine Contacts Site
floor machines
bissell Vacuum parts


Board Security

192 Attacks blocked

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group