|
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Hugh Gibbons
Guest
|
 Posted: Sun May 18, 2008 9:33 am Post subject: Re: Johnny come lately finally endorses someone--too late fo |
 |
|
In article <482d12f4$0$4043$bbae4d71@news.suddenlink.net>,
Tim Howard <tim.howard@suddenlink.net> wrote:
| Quote: |
Eddie Haskell wrote:
"HarryNadds" <hoofhearted07@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:f0f40653-7801-4223-b059-730805e25e63@t54g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
On May 14, 11:20 pm, "Kickin' Ass and Takin' Names"
PopUlist...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On May 15, 12:13 am, Tim Howard <tim.how...@suddenlink.net> wrote:
So John Edwards endorsed Barack Obama. Big deal. He should have
endorsed someone before Penn. At this point, what does his endorsement
mean? If I was Obama, I would be thinking "thanks for almost nothing".
If Edwards had gotten off the pot and endorsed Obama a couple of weeks
ago, he would have won Indiana and probably would have beaten Clinton by
20 points or more in NC. If Edwards' endorsement came before Penn, he
would have been at least a little closer than 10 points. Why does
Edwards endorse him now that the last blue-collar, all-white state's
contest is over?
You wish.
It also means he gets the support of every bottom feeding scumbag
trial lawyer.LMAO !!
Yep, the democrat's largest single contributors. A corrupt racket and the
little guy pays out the ass.
-Eddie Haskell
Everyone hates a lawyer until they need one. I'd rather have a lawyer
in the White House than a war-mongering "patriot" like McCain.
|
Or somebody who doesn't know or care what the law is, like Bush and his
cronies. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Hugh Gibbons
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun May 18, 2008 9:37 am Post subject: Re: Johnny come lately finally endorses someone--too late fo |
|
|
In article
<380b7788-e1b0-4680-ac72-adb09206643b@q24g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
MACK DADDY <pepsivanilla@msn.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
On May 15, 10:19 am, "Eddie Haskell" <k...@okjht.com> wrote:
"MACK DADDY" <pepsivani...@msn.com> wrote in message
news:f2de64e5-7985-4d40-84e0-1e29feff64d1@z16g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
On May 14, 9:13 pm, Tim Howard <tim.how...@suddenlink.net> wrote:
So John Edwards endorsed Barack Obama. Big deal. He should have
endorsed someone before Penn. At this point, what does his endorsement
mean? If I was Obama, I would be thinking "thanks for almost nothing".
If Edwards had gotten off the pot and endorsed Obama a couple of weeks
ago, he would have won Indiana and probably would have beaten Clinton by
20 points or more in NC. If Edwards' endorsement came before Penn, he
would have been at least a little closer than 10 points. Why does
Edwards endorse him now that the last blue-collar, all-white state's
contest is over?
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
It has nothing to do with the race for the Democratic nominee. It has
to do with Obama endorsing Edwards plan to eliminate poverty.
Oh my god not again! Haven't the poor suffered enough destruction of their
families and communities at the hands of democrats so as to create
government dependence and votes?
-Eddie Haskell
The preceding banal drivel brought to you by a Wacko Warmongering
Republitard.
YOu got it all wrong. It's the Repulsitards who make poor people
suffer, except for when they just flat-out kill them. Democrats are
the party that helps poor people get education, jobs, health care,
etc. So "wise up, Eddie!"
|
Eddie is suffering from the Conservative Talking Point/Delusion that
helping poor people actually hurts them. They don't believe it for any
RATIONAL reason. They believe it because they want it to be so, so they
will have an excuse for not wanting to help. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
