|
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Robert Clark
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
oriel36
Guest
|
 Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 7:30 pm Post subject: Re: 2008 Lunar and Planetary Science Conference abstracts ar |
 |
|
On Feb 6, 7:03 pm, Robert Clark <rgregorycl...@yahoo.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
39th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference.http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2008/
Bob Clark
|
Make sure they asked themselves how they managed to miss an orbital
component ?.
The answer is easy - until powerful and sequential imaging it would be
extremely difficult to isolate the orbital component,it just happens
that one of our planets in the solar system has both a unique axial
orientation and Equatorial rings -
http://asymptotia.com/wp-images/2007/08/uranus_rings.jpg
If somebody can think of a bigger modification of heliocentric
reasoning by scraping the pseudo-dynamic of variable axial/equatorial
inclination for the addition of a new orbital component then I would
like to know it.
Who knows with these conferences,maybe they will remove Neptune as a
planet because it has not cleared its orbit of the ex-planet Pluto and
therefore does not qualify as a planet !!. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
David Williams
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 9:17 pm Post subject: Re: 2008 Lunar and Planetary Science Conference abstracts ar |
|
|
-> Who knows with these conferences,maybe they will remove Neptune as a
-> planet because it has not cleared its orbit of the ex-planet Pluto and
-> therefore does not qualify as a planet !!.
Jupiter is a better candidate for de-planetification. It has failed to
clear its orbit of the Trojan asteroids. Pluto's orbit does not
actually intersect that of Neptune. They cross, but are separated in
the third dimension. The Trojans, on the other hand, spend the entire
time in or very close to the orbital path of Jupiter.
dow |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
windbag
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2008 10:43 pm Post subject: Re: 2008 Lunar and Planetary Science Conference abstracts ar |
|
|
David Williams wrote:
| Quote: |
-> Who knows with these conferences,maybe they will remove Neptune as a
-> planet because it has not cleared its orbit of the ex-planet Pluto and
-> therefore does not qualify as a planet !!.
Jupiter is a better candidate for de-planetification. It has failed to
clear its orbit of the Trojan asteroids. Pluto's orbit does not
actually intersect that of Neptune. They cross, but are separated in
the third dimension. The Trojans, on the other hand, spend the entire
time in or very close to the orbital path of Jupiter.
dow
|
On the other hand, Ceres should be granted planet status due to its
vast difference from the surrounding asteroids. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Robert Clark
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 2:08 pm Post subject: Re: 2008 Lunar and Planetary Science Conference abstracts ar |
|
|
On Feb 6, 3:03 pm, Robert Clark <rgregorycl...@yahoo.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
39thLunarandPlanetaryScienceConference.http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2008/
Bob Clark
|
A review of some of the results at this years LPSC conference is
given here:
In The Field: Lunar and Planetary Science Archives.
http://blogs.nature.com/news/blog/conference_reports/lunar_and_planetary_science/
Bob Clark |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
