Science Talk
Science Talk
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Forums
Science Forums
Biology
Math
Astronomy
Physics
Technology
Chemistry
Social Sciences
History
Psychology
Philosophy
Sociology
Linguistics
Religious Studies
Economics
Man Woman Ethno
Ask an Expert
World Records
Society Issues
Education
People
Alternative Science
Science Disproves Evolution

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Science Talk Forum Index -> Creationism
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Pahu
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 5:37 am    Post subject: Science Disproves Evolution Reply with quote

Interstellar Gas

Detailed analyses indicate that neither stars nor planets could form
from interstellar gas clouds (a). To do so, either by first forming
dust particles (b) or by direct gravitational collapse of the gas(c),
would require vastly more time than the alleged age of the universe.
An obvious alternative is that stars and planets were created.

a. "The process by which an interstellar cloud is concentrated until
it is held together gravitationally to become a protostar is not
known. In quantitative work, it has simply been assumed that the
number of atoms per cm^3 has somehow increased about a thousand-fold
over that in a dense nebula. The two principal factors inhibiting the
formation of a protostar are that the gas has a tendency to disperse
before the density becomes high enough for self-gravitation to be
effective, and that any initial angular momentum would cause
excessively rapid rotation as the material contracts. Some mechanism
must therefore be provided for gathering the material into a
sufficiently small volume that self-gravitation may become effective,
and the angular momentum must in some way be removed." Eva Novotny,
Introduction to Stellar Atmospheres and Interiors (New York: Oxford
University Press, 1973), pp. 279-280.

b. Martin Harwit, Astrophysical Concepts (New York: John Wiley & Sons,
1973), p. 394.

"... there is no reasonable astronomical scenario in which mineral
grains can condense." Fred Hoyle and Chandra Wickramasinghe, "Where
Microbes Boldly Went," New Scientist, Vol. 91, 13 August 1981, p.
413.

c. "Contemporary opinion on star formation holds that objects called
protostars are formed as condensations from the interstellar gas. This
condensation process is very difficult theoretically, and no essential
theoretical understanding can be claimed; in fact, some theoretical
evidence argues strongly against the possibility of star formation.
However, we know that the stars exist, and we must do our best to
account for them." John C. Brandt, The Physics and Astronomy of the
Sun and Stars (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1966), p. 111.

Theories for the Evolution of the Solar System and Universe Are
Unscientific and Hopelessly Inadequate

http://www.creationscience.com/
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Science Talk Forum Index -> Creationism All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Australian Debt Consolidation Experts
medical insurance
Wedding Invitation
Search Escorts and girls (incall/OutCall) online with Oasi2000, ItaliaChiamami, BestAnnunci...
Swingers and Swinging
Hospitality industry
Cheap Car Insurance
Make Your Own Website
Free calls to Pakistan
Long island Cleaning service
toxic mold
UK Swingers Genuine Contacts Site
Janitorial Supplies
Vacuum Bags


Board Security

189 Attacks blocked

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group