Science Talk

Cyberiade.it Anonymous Re · Guest

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Last time around, the September 11, 2001 attacks barely
interrupted Wall Street's trading activities--four days
vacation! Al-Qaeda had to have been disappointed, given
the *block-buster* spectacle of the falling twin towers.
Once trading resumed the next Monday, business as usual.

Which begs the question, if you were the master planner
for Al-Qaeda, what would your expectations be upon your
next attack? Would you expect to gain temporary victory,
as your attacks did last time? I mean, you knocked down
a couple of buildings, inflicted minor collateral damage,
but apart from that, all you and your pilots had managed
to accomplish was to temporarily galvanize public opinion
against an unseen enemy, whose parent country's elite are
on mostly amicable terms with the USA's controlling elite.
Of course, the global war between the Jihadist terrorists
and the more occidental has been going along more or less
at an even keel. No big bombs. No big battles. Status quo.

And frankly, it seems that nothing happens by accident in
Washington D.C., like Iraq is not accidentally a quagmire.
If the US & her allies didn't lay waste to the enemy, thus
ensuring their immediate and unconditional surrender, then
it is definitely not by accident, but is part of the plan.

Here we are, nearly six years later, and public opinion
of the White House, the US Congress and US Supreme Court
has sunk like a stone to an all-time low. If GW Bush gets
any more unpopular, dittos for Congress, American voters
are going to find it VERY difficult to be convinced that
voting matters at all. Maybe it never did, but nowadays
this Inconvenient Truth, to borrow from a famous former
Vice-President, this mass-realization that voting never
really changed a God-damn thing in Washington D.C., nor
anywhere else where Ben Franklin always dictates policy,
that's going to make it especially tough on whoever runs
on either party's Presidential ticket in 2008. I do not
envy them, nor their daunting, I'd guess insurmountable,
challenge to win back the confidence of American voters.
I just don't see how they could do it at this late date...

Which again begs the question regarding the inevitability
of another terrorist attack. America is self-destructing
before our eyes, with no solution in sight. So what would
Al-Qaeda do to ensure her continual downfall to the point
where she'll never recover--not entirely unlike the NAZI-
regime finally fell to her inevitable death in 1945? The
most obvious and consequential difference being that the
USA is prophesied to, meaning that she's destined to, and
therefore must drag very nearly the entire inhabited earth
down with her into Hell, and there is very nearly nothing
that anyone can do about it...what would the Jihadists do?

So you see, whether it's al-Qaeda or whomever else strikes
the next blow against the USA, one thing is for sure: they
will try and hurt her where it hurts her the most: in her
pocketbook! They'd most certainly strike against her money
centers, against oil supplies, against food supplies, and
against her water supplies. Those targets are obvious. But
if you had but *one* primary target to strike, and only one
means, motive and opportunity to successfully complete that
mission, then who, what, where, when, and how, would it be,
knowing that doing so would force severe nuclear reprisals?

Consider, few if any among the millions of militant Islamic
Jihadists are familiar with biblical prophecy nor latter-day
prophecy, much less recognize the veracity and inexorability
of the aforesaid. So whether these would-be terrorists have
ever heard of the Apocalypse, or Armageddon for example, is
dubious at best. Even the supposedly "educated" of academia
do not study prophecy, much less comprehend nor respect its
divinely-inspired author. So we can only surmise that these
Jihadists are neither more nor less inclined to follow suit.
Either that or they'll go by the Qur'an, not the Holy Bible.
Not to imply the Koran isn't divinely-inspired, nor doesn't
contain prophecies of its own. I have no doubt that it does.
But of all extant prophecies, there is but *one* Apocalypse.

In other words, the Jihadists have their own motivations. If
God put it in their hearts or not, only the Prophets can say.
We do know that it'll take a lot more than forcing the market
to get "stuck" for a few days, before the USA will retaliate.
You see, it's her decisive Retaliation which bodes Armageddon,
i.e. which provokes the whole toward the great & final battle.

In Vigilance,
Daniel Joseph Min
http://www.2hot2cool.com/11/danieljosephmin/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBRqlZw5ljD7YrHM/nEQLpWQCg74OoE1V3zJnaTqCUqVgzFs016vMAn2h3
YXwnLIYy9ouI3iLMz4MW+bf8
=xDGw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Lorentz · Guest

On Jul 26, 11:12 pm, anonym...@remailer.cyberiade.it (Cyberiade.it
Anonymous Remailer) wrote: