Science Talk
Science Talk
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Forums
Science Forums
Biology
Math
Astronomy
Physics
Technology
Chemistry
Social Sciences
History
Psychology
Philosophy
Sociology
Linguistics
Religious Studies
Economics
Man Woman Ethno
Ask an Expert
World Records
Society Issues
Education
People
Alternative Science
Conservapedia laid a trap for me

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Science Talk Forum Index -> Science Talk
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Kevin Wayne Williams
Guest





PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2007 5:59 am    Post subject: Conservapedia laid a trap for me Reply with quote

Someone put an article on "Crackpot" into Conservapedia, and I just
couldn't resist adding "William Dembski" to the "See Also" section.
Banned for life in only six minutes.

KWW
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Friar Broccoli
Guest





PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2007 6:08 am    Post subject: Re: Conservapedia laid a trap for me Reply with quote

On May 28, 8:59 pm, Kevin Wayne Williams <kww.niho...@verizon.nut>
wrote:
Quote:
Someone put an article on "Crackpot" into Conservapedia, and I just
couldn't resist adding "William Dembski" to the "See Also" section.
Banned for life in only six minutes.

I havn't been following the competition.
Is this the record time so far?
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Kevin Wayne Williams
Guest





PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2007 6:32 am    Post subject: Re: Conservapedia laid a trap for me Reply with quote

Friar Broccoli wrote:
Quote:
On May 28, 8:59 pm, Kevin Wayne Williams <kww.niho...@verizon.nut
wrote:
Someone put an article on "Crackpot" into Conservapedia, and I just
couldn't resist adding "William Dembski" to the "See Also" section.
Banned for life in only six minutes.

I havn't been following the competition.
Is this the record time so far?

Not by far. I do think that article is going to be a tarpit, though.

Hard for anyone to pass up.

KWW
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Ron O
Guest





PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2007 6:40 am    Post subject: Re: Conservapedia laid a trap for me Reply with quote

On May 28, 7:59 pm, Kevin Wayne Williams <kww.niho...@verizon.nut>
wrote:
Quote:
Someone put an article on "Crackpot" into Conservapedia, and I just
couldn't resist adding "William Dembski" to the "See Also" section.
Banned for life in only six minutes.

KWW

Rational people shouldn't participate. It will be an amusing
experiment to see how far off the deep end they go before someone
pulls the plug or tries to moderate the lunacy.

Ron Okimoto
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Shane
Guest





PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2007 6:45 am    Post subject: Re: Conservapedia laid a trap for me Reply with quote

On Mon, 28 May 2007 20:59:59 -0400, Kevin Wayne Williams wrote:

Quote:
Someone put an article on "Crackpot" into Conservapedia, and I just
couldn't resist adding "William Dembski" to the "See Also" section.
Banned for life in only six minutes.

KWW

Amazing, as Dembski fits the difinition so closely, it could almost
have been modelled on him.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Desertphile
Guest





PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2007 8:24 am    Post subject: Re: Conservapedia laid a trap for me Reply with quote

On Tue, 29 May 2007 11:45:51 +1000, Shane
<remarcsdNOSPAM@ozemail.com.au> wrote:

Quote:
On Mon, 28 May 2007 20:59:59 -0400, Kevin Wayne Williams wrote:

Someone put an article on "Crackpot" into Conservapedia, and I just
couldn't resist adding "William Dembski" to the "See Also" section.
Banned for life in only six minutes.

KWW

Amazing, as Dembski fits the difinition so closely, it could almost
have been modelled on him.

Dembski is an IC: irreducibly crackpot.


--
http://desertphile.org
Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water
"Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Stile4aly
Guest





PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2007 10:23 am    Post subject: Re: Conservapedia laid a trap for me Reply with quote

On May 28, 6:40 pm, Ron O <rokim...@cox.net> wrote:
Quote:
On May 28, 7:59 pm, Kevin Wayne Williams <kww.niho...@verizon.nut
wrote:

Someone put an article on "Crackpot" into Conservapedia, and I just
couldn't resist adding "William Dembski" to the "See Also" section.
Banned for life in only six minutes.

KWW

Rational people shouldn't participate. It will be an amusing
experiment to see how far off the deep end they go before someone
pulls the plug or tries to moderate the lunacy.

Ron Okimoto

I gave it a go over there for a little while, but after my 1st sock
got banned (for suggesting that HPV vaccine might actually be
effective) I've decided to give it a rest. While I was there, though,
I did observe one editor named Auld Nick who had a very interesting
form of reverse vandalism.

He would watch for articles that suggested that any form of evolution
might have occurred, and notified the sysop running the evolution
page. That sysop would butcher the article to remove references to
evolution and add references to creationism, and then ban any editor
who tried to change it back.

He did the same thing with dates over 6000 years and a YEC editor, and
with any page that suggested something other than a literal bible
interpretation, and with any page that suggested that Homosexuals
might not be sinful child molesting perverts. The editors did all the
vandalism for him, it was a sight to behold.

Conservapedia has long since lost a chance to be a reasonable
alternative to wiki; indeed it was probably doomed from the start.
Almost any editor that disagreed with Andy Schlafly got booted off the
site in the last 2 weeks, with most of it happening on May 16, what is
now referred to as "The Night of the Dull Knives."
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


R. Baldwin
Guest





PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2007 10:43 am    Post subject: Re: Conservapedia laid a trap for me Reply with quote

"Kevin Wayne Williams" <kww.nihongo@verizon.nut> wrote in message
news:135mupd64ajoc28@news.supernews.com...
Quote:
Someone put an article on "Crackpot" into Conservapedia, and I just
couldn't resist adding "William Dembski" to the "See Also" section. Banned
for life in only six minutes.

KWW


Have they got an article on antitriclavianism yet?
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


John Wilkins
Guest





PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2007 11:04 am    Post subject: Re: Conservapedia laid a trap for me Reply with quote

R. Baldwin <res0k7yx@nozirevBACKWARDS.net> wrote:

Quote:
"Kevin Wayne Williams" <kww.nihongo@verizon.nut> wrote in message
news:135mupd64ajoc28@news.supernews.com...
Someone put an article on "Crackpot" into Conservapedia, and I just
couldn't resist adding "William Dembski" to the "See Also" section. Banned
for life in only six minutes.

KWW


Have they got an article on antitriclavianism yet?

Of course not. There is only *one* Cliff Clavin.
--
John S. Wilkins, Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Biohumanities Project
University of Queensland - Blog: scienceblogs.com/evolvingthoughts
"He used... sarcasm. He knew all the tricks, dramatic irony, metaphor,
bathos, puns, parody, litotes and... satire. He was vicious."
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Josh Hayes
Guest





PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2007 10:12 am    Post subject: Re: Conservapedia laid a trap for me Reply with quote

Ernest Major <{$to$}@meden.demon.co.uk> wrote in
news:iA6vYbvA6KXGFw$f@meden.invalid:

Quote:
If the sysops are doing nothing wrong, then he did nothing wrong, and
so there is no reason to ban him. If what he did was wrong, then what
the sysops are doing is wrong, and they have a problem to fix. They
can have it one way or the other, but not half and half.

What, you're expecting logical consistency from someone whose last name is
"Schlafly"?

I have to wonder if part of why he argues so vehemently against the descent
of possibly-genetically-influenced traits is that he's descended from his
mom, who is, I must reveal, an alumna of my own alma mater (her AB in 1944 at
the age of 19(!), her JD in 1978, when I was finishing up my own frosh year).

Yeesh. We'll graduate anyone.

-JAH, AB 1981 - Go Bears!

as if I care about the Bears. "bears", sure.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Science Talk Forum Index -> Science Talk All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Australian Debt Consolidation Experts
medical insurance
Wedding Ring
Escort e accompagnatrice in Rimini, Reggio Emilia, in Riviera Adriatica, in Modena...
UK Swingers Contacts
Computer Software Talk
life insurance
Make Your Own Website
Free phone calls to Poland
Long island Cleaning service
Mold
UK Swingers Genuine Contacts Site
floor machines
Vacuum Bags


Board Security

192 Attacks blocked

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group