|
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Guest
|
Posted: Mon May 28, 2007 7:48 am Post subject: homomorphisms from a finite group to C* |
|
|
if a finite group G has order N, is the number of homomorphisms from G
to multiplicative set of complex numbers (C*) also N? Why? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Guest
|
Posted: Mon May 28, 2007 8:20 am Post subject: Re: homomorphisms from a finite group to C* |
|
|
On May 27, 7:48 pm, oferl...@yahoo.com wrote:
| Quote: |
if a finite group G has order N, is the number of homomorphisms from G
to multiplicative set of complex numbers (C*) also N? Why?
|
Why not think about it for ten minutes before posting? Try some
examples. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Keith Ramsay Guest
|
Posted: Mon May 28, 2007 8:57 am Post subject: Re: homomorphisms from a finite group to C* |
|
|
On May 27, 10:42 pm, quasi <q...@null.set> wrote:
|Finally, prove it assuming G is nonabelian. Let K be the commutator
|subgroup of G. Show that every homomorphism from G/K to C corresponds
|to k distinct homomorphisms from G to C where k=|K|.
No, it only is true if G is Abelian. If G is not Abelian,
there are only |G/K|.
Keith Ramsay |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
quasi Guest
|
Posted: Mon May 28, 2007 9:42 am Post subject: Re: homomorphisms from a finite group to C* |
|
|
On 27 May 2007 19:48:53 -0700, oferlock@yahoo.com wrote:
| Quote: |
if a finite group G has order N, is the number of homomorphisms from G
to multiplicative set of complex numbers (C*) also N? Why?
|
Yes (I think).
Hints:
First prove it assuming G is cyclic. The elements of G would have to
map to what specific set of elements of C?
Next, prove it assuming G is abelian. Express G as a direct product of
cyclic groups.
Finally, prove it assuming G is nonabelian. Let K be the commutator
subgroup of G. Show that every homomorphism from G/K to C corresponds
to k distinct homomorphisms from G to C where k=|K|.
quasi |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
quasi Guest
|
Posted: Mon May 28, 2007 10:01 am Post subject: Re: homomorphisms from a finite group to C* |
|
|
On 27 May 2007 20:57:11 -0700, Keith Ramsay <kramsay@aol.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
On May 27, 10:42 pm, quasi <q...@null.set> wrote:
|Finally, prove it assuming G is nonabelian. Let K be the commutator
|subgroup of G. Show that every homomorphism from G/K to C corresponds
|to k distinct homomorphisms from G to C where k=|K|.
No, it only is true if G is Abelian. If G is not Abelian,
there are only |G/K|.
Keith Ramsay
|
Of course, I should have seen that.
For example, if K=G, then the only homomorphism from G to C is the
trivial one.
quasi |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
quasi Guest
|
Posted: Mon May 28, 2007 10:15 am Post subject: Re: homomorphisms from a finite group to C* |
|
|
On Mon, 28 May 2007 00:01:33 -0500, quasi <quasi@null.set> wrote:
| Quote: |
On 27 May 2007 20:57:11 -0700, Keith Ramsay <kramsay@aol.com> wrote:
On May 27, 10:42 pm, quasi <q...@null.set> wrote:
|Finally, prove it assuming G is nonabelian. Let K be the commutator
|subgroup of G. Show that every homomorphism from G/K to C corresponds
|to k distinct homomorphisms from G to C where k=|K|.
No, it only is true if G is Abelian. If G is not Abelian,
there are only |G/K|.
Keith Ramsay
Of course, I should have seen that.
For example, if K=G, then the only homomorphism from G to C is the
trivial one.
|
But wait, I take it back.
I'm not so sure you're right.
Every homomorphism from G to C factors through G/K, but there may be
more than one homomorphism from G onto G/K.
In fact, start with any homomorphism of G onto G/K and follow it with
an arbitrary automorphism of G/K to get a new homomorphism from G onto
G/K.
So I think the correct answer for the nonabelian case is m*|G/K| where
m=|aut(G/K)|.
quasi |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Subluxian Guest
|
Posted: Mon May 28, 2007 10:24 am Post subject: Re: homomorphisms from a finite group to C* |
|
|
On May 27, 10:15 pm, quasi <q...@null.set> wrote:
| Quote: |
On Mon, 28 May 2007 00:01:33 -0500, quasi <q...@null.set> wrote:
On 27 May 2007 20:57:11 -0700, Keith Ramsay <kram...@aol.com> wrote:
On May 27, 10:42 pm, quasi <q...@null.set> wrote:
|Finally, prove it assuming G is nonabelian. Let K be the commutator
|subgroup of G. Show that every homomorphism from G/K to C corresponds
|to k distinct homomorphisms from G to C where k=|K|.
No, it only is true if G is Abelian. If G is not Abelian,
there are only |G/K|.
Keith Ramsay
Of course, I should have seen that.
For example, if K=G, then the only homomorphism from G to C is the
trivial one.
But wait, I take it back.
I'm not so sure you're right.
Every homomorphism from G to C factors through G/K, but there may be
more than one homomorphism from G onto G/K.
|
Yep.
| Quote: |
In fact, start with any homomorphism of G onto G/K and follow it with
an arbitrary automorphism of G/K to get a new homomorphism from G onto
G/K.
|
Yes: If T in Hom(G,G/K) and A in Aut(G/K), then AT in Hom(G,G/K).
But it is not necessarily the case that AT is not equal to A'T for all
A, A' in Aut(G/K), T in Hom(G, G/K). So your claim that we always "get
a /new/ homomorphism" (emphasis mine) is false.
There is an obvious surjection Hom(G, G/K) x Aut(G/K) x Hom(G/K, C) ->
Hom(G,C); but we are interested in counting the elements of the range
of this surjection, not its domain.
Cheers - Chas |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
quasi Guest
|
Posted: Mon May 28, 2007 11:01 am Post subject: Re: homomorphisms from a finite group to C* |
|
|
On 27 May 2007 22:24:28 -0700, Subluxian <cbrown@cbrownsystems.com>
wrote:
| Quote: |
On May 27, 10:15 pm, quasi <q...@null.set> wrote:
On Mon, 28 May 2007 00:01:33 -0500, quasi <q...@null.set> wrote:
On 27 May 2007 20:57:11 -0700, Keith Ramsay <kram...@aol.com> wrote:
On May 27, 10:42 pm, quasi <q...@null.set> wrote:
|Finally, prove it assuming G is nonabelian. Let K be the commutator
|subgroup of G. Show that every homomorphism from G/K to C corresponds
|to k distinct homomorphisms from G to C where k=|K|.
No, it only is true if G is Abelian. If G is not Abelian,
there are only |G/K|.
Keith Ramsay
Of course, I should have seen that.
For example, if K=G, then the only homomorphism from G to C is the
trivial one.
But wait, I take it back.
I'm not so sure you're right.
Every homomorphism from G to C factors through G/K, but there may be
more than one homomorphism from G onto G/K.
Yep.
In fact, start with any homomorphism of G onto G/K and follow it with
an arbitrary automorphism of G/K to get a new homomorphism from G onto
G/K.
Yes: If T in Hom(G,G/K) and A in Aut(G/K), then AT in Hom(G,G/K).
But it is not necessarily the case that AT is not equal to A'T for all
A, A' in Aut(G/K), T in Hom(G, G/K). So your claim that we always "get
a /new/ homomorphism" (emphasis mine) is false.
|
But I'm choosing a surjective T.
Thus, AT=A'T implies A=A', hence those homomorphisms really are new.
Then, as far as I can see, the number of surjective homomorphisms from
G to G/K is equal to |aut(G/K)|.
So my claim that the number of homomorphisms from G to C is equal to
m*|G/K| where m=|aut(G/K|
still seems right.
quasi |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Rupert Guest
|
Posted: Mon May 28, 2007 11:01 am Post subject: Re: homomorphisms from a finite group to C* |
|
|
On May 28, 3:15 pm, quasi <q...@null.set> wrote:
| Quote: |
On Mon, 28 May 2007 00:01:33 -0500, quasi <q...@null.set> wrote:
On 27 May 2007 20:57:11 -0700, Keith Ramsay <kram...@aol.com> wrote:
On May 27, 10:42 pm, quasi <q...@null.set> wrote:
|Finally, prove it assuming G is nonabelian. Let K be the commutator
|subgroup of G. Show that every homomorphism from G/K to C corresponds
|to k distinct homomorphisms from G to C where k=|K|.
No, it only is true if G is Abelian. If G is not Abelian,
there are only |G/K|.
Keith Ramsay
Of course, I should have seen that.
For example, if K=G, then the only homomorphism from G to C is the
trivial one.
But wait, I take it back.
I'm not so sure you're right.
Every homomorphism from G to C factors through G/K, but there may be
more than one homomorphism from G onto G/K.
In fact, start with any homomorphism of G onto G/K and follow it with
an arbitrary automorphism of G/K to get a new homomorphism from G onto
G/K.
So I think the correct answer for the nonabelian case is m*|G/K| where
m=|aut(G/K)|.
quasi- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
|
A homomorphism from G to C* is constant on every coset in G/K. Thus
there is a bijection from Hom(G,C*) to Hom(G/K,C*). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|