Science Talk
Science Talk
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Forums
Science Forums
Biology
Math
Astronomy
Physics
Technology
Chemistry
Social Sciences
History
Psychology
Philosophy
Sociology
Linguistics
Religious Studies
Economics
Man Woman Ethno
Ask an Expert
World Records
Society Issues
Education
People
Alternative Science
homomorphisms from a finite group to C*

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Science Talk Forum Index -> Mathematics
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Guest






PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2007 7:48 am    Post subject: homomorphisms from a finite group to C* Reply with quote

if a finite group G has order N, is the number of homomorphisms from G
to multiplicative set of complex numbers (C*) also N? Why?
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Guest






PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2007 8:20 am    Post subject: Re: homomorphisms from a finite group to C* Reply with quote

On May 27, 7:48 pm, oferl...@yahoo.com wrote:
Quote:
if a finite group G has order N, is the number of homomorphisms from G
to multiplicative set of complex numbers (C*) also N? Why?

Why not think about it for ten minutes before posting? Try some
examples.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Keith Ramsay
Guest





PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2007 8:57 am    Post subject: Re: homomorphisms from a finite group to C* Reply with quote

On May 27, 10:42 pm, quasi <q...@null.set> wrote:
|Finally, prove it assuming G is nonabelian. Let K be the commutator
|subgroup of G. Show that every homomorphism from G/K to C corresponds
|to k distinct homomorphisms from G to C where k=|K|.

No, it only is true if G is Abelian. If G is not Abelian,
there are only |G/K|.

Keith Ramsay
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


quasi
Guest





PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2007 9:42 am    Post subject: Re: homomorphisms from a finite group to C* Reply with quote

On 27 May 2007 19:48:53 -0700, oferlock@yahoo.com wrote:

Quote:
if a finite group G has order N, is the number of homomorphisms from G
to multiplicative set of complex numbers (C*) also N? Why?

Yes (I think).

Hints:

First prove it assuming G is cyclic. The elements of G would have to
map to what specific set of elements of C?

Next, prove it assuming G is abelian. Express G as a direct product of
cyclic groups.

Finally, prove it assuming G is nonabelian. Let K be the commutator
subgroup of G. Show that every homomorphism from G/K to C corresponds
to k distinct homomorphisms from G to C where k=|K|.

quasi
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


quasi
Guest





PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2007 10:01 am    Post subject: Re: homomorphisms from a finite group to C* Reply with quote

On 27 May 2007 20:57:11 -0700, Keith Ramsay <kramsay@aol.com> wrote:

Quote:
On May 27, 10:42 pm, quasi <q...@null.set> wrote:
|Finally, prove it assuming G is nonabelian. Let K be the commutator
|subgroup of G. Show that every homomorphism from G/K to C corresponds
|to k distinct homomorphisms from G to C where k=|K|.

No, it only is true if G is Abelian. If G is not Abelian,
there are only |G/K|.

Keith Ramsay

Of course, I should have seen that.

For example, if K=G, then the only homomorphism from G to C is the
trivial one.

quasi
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


quasi
Guest





PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2007 10:15 am    Post subject: Re: homomorphisms from a finite group to C* Reply with quote

On Mon, 28 May 2007 00:01:33 -0500, quasi <quasi@null.set> wrote:

Quote:
On 27 May 2007 20:57:11 -0700, Keith Ramsay <kramsay@aol.com> wrote:

On May 27, 10:42 pm, quasi <q...@null.set> wrote:
|Finally, prove it assuming G is nonabelian. Let K be the commutator
|subgroup of G. Show that every homomorphism from G/K to C corresponds
|to k distinct homomorphisms from G to C where k=|K|.

No, it only is true if G is Abelian. If G is not Abelian,
there are only |G/K|.

Keith Ramsay

Of course, I should have seen that.

For example, if K=G, then the only homomorphism from G to C is the
trivial one.

But wait, I take it back.

I'm not so sure you're right.

Every homomorphism from G to C factors through G/K, but there may be
more than one homomorphism from G onto G/K.

In fact, start with any homomorphism of G onto G/K and follow it with
an arbitrary automorphism of G/K to get a new homomorphism from G onto
G/K.

So I think the correct answer for the nonabelian case is m*|G/K| where
m=|aut(G/K)|.

quasi
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Subluxian
Guest





PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2007 10:24 am    Post subject: Re: homomorphisms from a finite group to C* Reply with quote

On May 27, 10:15 pm, quasi <q...@null.set> wrote:
Quote:
On Mon, 28 May 2007 00:01:33 -0500, quasi <q...@null.set> wrote:
On 27 May 2007 20:57:11 -0700, Keith Ramsay <kram...@aol.com> wrote:

On May 27, 10:42 pm, quasi <q...@null.set> wrote:
|Finally, prove it assuming G is nonabelian. Let K be the commutator
|subgroup of G. Show that every homomorphism from G/K to C corresponds
|to k distinct homomorphisms from G to C where k=|K|.

No, it only is true if G is Abelian. If G is not Abelian,
there are only |G/K|.

Keith Ramsay

Of course, I should have seen that.

For example, if K=G, then the only homomorphism from G to C is the
trivial one.

But wait, I take it back.

I'm not so sure you're right.

Every homomorphism from G to C factors through G/K, but there may be
more than one homomorphism from G onto G/K.

Yep.

Quote:

In fact, start with any homomorphism of G onto G/K and follow it with
an arbitrary automorphism of G/K to get a new homomorphism from G onto
G/K.


Yes: If T in Hom(G,G/K) and A in Aut(G/K), then AT in Hom(G,G/K).

But it is not necessarily the case that AT is not equal to A'T for all
A, A' in Aut(G/K), T in Hom(G, G/K). So your claim that we always "get
a /new/ homomorphism" (emphasis mine) is false.

There is an obvious surjection Hom(G, G/K) x Aut(G/K) x Hom(G/K, C) ->
Hom(G,C); but we are interested in counting the elements of the range
of this surjection, not its domain.

Cheers - Chas
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


quasi
Guest





PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2007 11:01 am    Post subject: Re: homomorphisms from a finite group to C* Reply with quote

On 27 May 2007 22:24:28 -0700, Subluxian <cbrown@cbrownsystems.com>
wrote:

Quote:
On May 27, 10:15 pm, quasi <q...@null.set> wrote:
On Mon, 28 May 2007 00:01:33 -0500, quasi <q...@null.set> wrote:
On 27 May 2007 20:57:11 -0700, Keith Ramsay <kram...@aol.com> wrote:

On May 27, 10:42 pm, quasi <q...@null.set> wrote:
|Finally, prove it assuming G is nonabelian. Let K be the commutator
|subgroup of G. Show that every homomorphism from G/K to C corresponds
|to k distinct homomorphisms from G to C where k=|K|.

No, it only is true if G is Abelian. If G is not Abelian,
there are only |G/K|.

Keith Ramsay

Of course, I should have seen that.

For example, if K=G, then the only homomorphism from G to C is the
trivial one.

But wait, I take it back.

I'm not so sure you're right.

Every homomorphism from G to C factors through G/K, but there may be
more than one homomorphism from G onto G/K.

Yep.


In fact, start with any homomorphism of G onto G/K and follow it with
an arbitrary automorphism of G/K to get a new homomorphism from G onto
G/K.


Yes: If T in Hom(G,G/K) and A in Aut(G/K), then AT in Hom(G,G/K).

But it is not necessarily the case that AT is not equal to A'T for all
A, A' in Aut(G/K), T in Hom(G, G/K). So your claim that we always "get
a /new/ homomorphism" (emphasis mine) is false.

But I'm choosing a surjective T.

Thus, AT=A'T implies A=A', hence those homomorphisms really are new.

Then, as far as I can see, the number of surjective homomorphisms from
G to G/K is equal to |aut(G/K)|.

So my claim that the number of homomorphisms from G to C is equal to

m*|G/K| where m=|aut(G/K|

still seems right.

quasi
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Rupert
Guest





PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2007 11:01 am    Post subject: Re: homomorphisms from a finite group to C* Reply with quote

On May 28, 3:15 pm, quasi <q...@null.set> wrote:
Quote:
On Mon, 28 May 2007 00:01:33 -0500, quasi <q...@null.set> wrote:
On 27 May 2007 20:57:11 -0700, Keith Ramsay <kram...@aol.com> wrote:

On May 27, 10:42 pm, quasi <q...@null.set> wrote:
|Finally, prove it assuming G is nonabelian. Let K be the commutator
|subgroup of G. Show that every homomorphism from G/K to C corresponds
|to k distinct homomorphisms from G to C where k=|K|.

No, it only is true if G is Abelian. If G is not Abelian,
there are only |G/K|.

Keith Ramsay

Of course, I should have seen that.

For example, if K=G, then the only homomorphism from G to C is the
trivial one.

But wait, I take it back.

I'm not so sure you're right.

Every homomorphism from G to C factors through G/K, but there may be
more than one homomorphism from G onto G/K.

In fact, start with any homomorphism of G onto G/K and follow it with
an arbitrary automorphism of G/K to get a new homomorphism from G onto
G/K.

So I think the correct answer for the nonabelian case is m*|G/K| where
m=|aut(G/K)|.

quasi- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

A homomorphism from G to C* is constant on every coset in G/K. Thus
there is a bijection from Hom(G,C*) to Hom(G/K,C*).
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Science Talk Forum Index -> Mathematics All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Australian Debt Consolidation Experts
medical insurance
Wedding Invitation
Search Escorts and girls (incall/OutCall) online with Oasi2000, ItaliaChiamami, BestAnnunci...
New Zealand Swingers Contacts
Biotechnology Industry
personal secured loans
Make Your Own Website
Cheap phone calls to Canada
Cleaning Service
mold killer
UK Swingers Genuine Contacts Site
cleaning supplies
Eureka Vacuum Bags


Board Security

192 Attacks blocked

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group