Science Talk
Science Talk
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Forums
Science Forums
Biology
Math
Astronomy
Physics
Technology
Chemistry
Social Sciences
History
Psychology
Philosophy
Sociology
Linguistics
Religious Studies
Economics
Man Woman Ethno
Ask an Expert
World Records
Society Issues
Education
People
Alternative Science
Chuck Colson: A Career-Killing Theory

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Science Talk Forum Index -> Science Talk
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Jason Spaceman
Guest





PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2007 11:01 am    Post subject: Chuck Colson: A Career-Killing Theory Reply with quote

From the article:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intelligent Design at Iowa State

By Chuck Colson
Christian Post Guest Columnist
Sat, May. 26 2007 11:46 AM ET

Proponents of intelligent design never know when they might be led
away to the ideological chopping block. Take, for example, biologist
Carolyn Crocker, who was banned from teaching evolution at George
Mason University after mentioning intelligent design. Or evolutionary
biologist Richard Sternberg, who was demoted by the Smithsonian
Institute after he approved an article that supported intelligent
design. Now add Guillermo Gonzalez to that list.

Last month, Gonzalez, assistant professor of astronomy and physics at
Iowa State University, was denied tenure. His supposed crime?
Believing something other than Darwinism.

Why else would he be denied? It certainly can’t be his lack of
academic accomplishments. Iowa State requires its faculty to publish
fifteen peer-reviewed articles in order to qualify for tenure.
Gonzalez has submitted sixty-eight. On top of that, Gonzalez’s
ground-breaking research in astronomy has led to the discovery of two
new planets.

And on his own time, Gonzalez produced The Privileged Planet, a
groundbreaking book and documentary film on intelligent design, in
which he explains that the earth is uniquely situated to sustain
complex life. Mathematically speaking, the probability of a planet
like ours with all of the necessary conditions to sustain complex
life, Gonzalez says, is 10 to the negative fifteenth power, or one
thousandth of a trillionth.

Random chance cannot explain the alignment of all of these conditions,
such as the optimal distance from the right kind of star, plate
tectonics, the size of a moon that can stabilize itself on its axis,
the shielding presence of larger planets nearby, the right amount of
oxygen and water . . . just to name a few.

The only thing that can explain this is intelligent design. It’s a
bold assertion, and a risky one.

After his film was released in 2005, three of Gonzalez’s colleagues,
including the faculty advisor for the campus Atheist and Agnostic
Society, began campaigning against Gonzalez. Since then, more than 400
faculty members at Iowa State, the University of Iowa, and the
University of Northern Iowa have signed a petition condemning the
presentation of intelligent design as science. Although Gonzalez’s
name is not mentioned in the petition, he is clearly the target of
this rank prejudice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Read it at
http://www.christianpost.com/article/20070526/27637_A_Career-Killing_Theory.htm












J. Spaceman
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


John Wilkins
Guest





PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2007 6:53 am    Post subject: Re: Chuck Colson: A Career-Killing Theory Reply with quote

Tom McDonald <kiltmac@gspammail.com> wrote:

Quote:
Jason Spaceman wrote:
From the article:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intelligent Design at Iowa State

By Chuck Colson
Christian Post Guest Columnist
Sat, May. 26 2007 11:46 AM ET

snip

And on his own time, Gonzalez produced The Privileged Planet, a
groundbreaking book and documentary film on intelligent design, in
which he explains that the earth is uniquely situated to sustain
complex life. Mathematically speaking, the probability of a planet
like ours with all of the necessary conditions to sustain complex
life, Gonzalez says, is 10 to the negative fifteenth power, or one
thousandth of a trillionth.

Random chance cannot explain the alignment of all of these conditions,
such as the optimal distance from the right kind of star, plate
tectonics, the size of a moon that can stabilize itself on its axis,
the shielding presence of larger planets nearby, the right amount of
oxygen and water . . . just to name a few.

I wonder whether Dr. Pangloss got tenure for his work on this issue?

snip

I gather they tried to execute him, and then sold him as a slave. So
yes.
--
John S. Wilkins, Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Biohumanities Project
University of Queensland - Blog: scienceblogs.com/evolvingthoughts
"He used... sarcasm. He knew all the tricks, dramatic irony, metaphor,
bathos, puns, parody, litotes and... satire. He was vicious."
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Desertphile
Guest





PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2007 8:16 am    Post subject: Re: Chuck Colson: A Career-Killing Theory Reply with quote

On Tue, 29 May 2007 11:53:22 +1000, j.wilkins1@uq.edu.au (John
Wilkins) wrote:

Quote:
Tom McDonald <kiltmac@gspammail.com> wrote:

Jason Spaceman wrote:
From the article:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intelligent Design at Iowa State

By Chuck Colson
Christian Post Guest Columnist
Sat, May. 26 2007 11:46 AM ET

snip

And on his own time, Gonzalez produced The Privileged Planet, a
groundbreaking book and documentary film on intelligent design, in
which he explains that the earth is uniquely situated to sustain
complex life. Mathematically speaking, the probability of a planet
like ours with all of the necessary conditions to sustain complex
life, Gonzalez says, is 10 to the negative fifteenth power, or one
thousandth of a trillionth.

Random chance cannot explain the alignment of all of these conditions,
such as the optimal distance from the right kind of star, plate
tectonics, the size of a moon that can stabilize itself on its axis,
the shielding presence of larger planets nearby, the right amount of
oxygen and water . . . just to name a few.

I wonder whether Dr. Pangloss got tenure for his work on this issue?

snip

I gather they tried to execute him, and then sold him as a slave. So
yes.

After eating part of his ass. Man, academia can sure be rough.


--
http://desertphile.org
Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water
"Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


John Wilkins
Guest





PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2007 8:48 am    Post subject: Re: Chuck Colson: A Career-Killing Theory Reply with quote

Desertphile <desertphile@nospam.org> wrote:

Quote:
On Tue, 29 May 2007 11:53:22 +1000, j.wilkins1@uq.edu.au (John
Wilkins) wrote:

Tom McDonald <kiltmac@gspammail.com> wrote:

Jason Spaceman wrote:
From the article:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intelligent Design at Iowa State

By Chuck Colson
Christian Post Guest Columnist
Sat, May. 26 2007 11:46 AM ET

snip

And on his own time, Gonzalez produced The Privileged Planet, a
groundbreaking book and documentary film on intelligent design, in
which he explains that the earth is uniquely situated to sustain
complex life. Mathematically speaking, the probability of a planet
like ours with all of the necessary conditions to sustain complex
life, Gonzalez says, is 10 to the negative fifteenth power, or one
thousandth of a trillionth.

Random chance cannot explain the alignment of all of these conditions,
such as the optimal distance from the right kind of star, plate
tectonics, the size of a moon that can stabilize itself on its axis,
the shielding presence of larger planets nearby, the right amount of
oxygen and water . . . just to name a few.

I wonder whether Dr. Pangloss got tenure for his work on this issue?

snip

I gather they tried to execute him, and then sold him as a slave. So
yes.

After eating part of his ass. Man, academia can sure be rough.

Well we already knew that eating one's own brain after receiving tenure
was de rigeur. This is merely a slight extension of that process.
--
John S. Wilkins, Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Biohumanities Project
University of Queensland - Blog: scienceblogs.com/evolvingthoughts
"He used... sarcasm. He knew all the tricks, dramatic irony, metaphor,
bathos, puns, parody, litotes and... satire. He was vicious."
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Science Talk Forum Index -> Science Talk All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Australian Debt Consolidation Experts
medical insurance
Wedding Invitation
Escort, massaggiatrici e accompagnatrici a Modena, Bologna, Parma, Brescia, Vicenza ...
Adult Films UK
Wholesale Industry
mortgage quotations
Make Your Own Website
Cheap phone calls to Poland
Cleaning Service
mold killer
UK Swingers Genuine Contacts Site
Janitorial Supplies
Vacuum Cleaner Bags


Board Security

192 Attacks blocked

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group