Science Talk
Science Talk
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Forums
Science Forums
Biology
Math
Astronomy
Physics
Technology
Chemistry
Social Sciences
History
Psychology
Philosophy
Sociology
Linguistics
Religious Studies
Economics
Man Woman Ethno
Ask an Expert
World Records
Society Issues
Education
People
Alternative Science
no proof against creation

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Science Talk Forum Index -> Science Talk
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Average Joe
Guest





PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2007 11:01 am    Post subject: no proof against creation Reply with quote

letÅ› suppose for a minute that evolution, abiogenesis, big bang, etc.,
exist

these could just be the *means* of creation

you have yet to disprove creation itself

--
Dale http://www.vedantasite.org
see website for real email address
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


J.J. O'Shea
Guest





PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2007 11:01 am    Post subject: Re: no proof against creation Reply with quote

On Mon, 28 May 2007 05:57:49 -0400, Average Joe wrote
(in article <S5mdneGtiLsAOsfbnZ2dnUVZ_i2dnZ2d@comcast.com>):

Quote:
letÅ› suppose for a minute that evolution, abiogenesis, big bang, etc.,
exist

You're confused. Several of the terms you use above don't mean what you seem
to think they mean. Hint: something which happened once, or a finite number
of times, a long time ago does not exist _now_. Evolution is an ongoing
process. The other two are (were) point events. Then there's that 'etc'...

Quote:

these could just be the *means* of creation

you have yet to disprove creation itself

So now you're a theistic evolutionist, not a literalist? Ray-ray will be most
upset with you.

Quote:





--
email to oshea dot j dot j at gmail dot com.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Average Joe
Guest





PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2007 11:01 am    Post subject: Re: no proof against creation Reply with quote

On Mon, 28 May 2007 06:13:22 -0400, J.J. O'Shea wrote:

Quote:
So now you're a theistic evolutionist, not a literalist?

I was speaking hypothetically, evolutionists think just because they have
thought up some new fangled thing that they have changed the landscape of
the human experience

by the way, I am not a Christian, I am a solipsist


--
Dale http://www.vedantasite.org
see website for real email address
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Friar Broccoli
Guest





PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2007 11:01 am    Post subject: Re: no proof against creation Reply with quote

On May 28, 6:41 am, Average Joe <THIS_IS_A_SPAMT...@comcast.net>
wrote:
Quote:
On Mon, 28 May 2007 06:13:22 -0400, J.J. O'Shea wrote:
So now you're a theistic evolutionist, not a literalist?

I was speaking hypothetically, evolutionists think just because they have
thought up some new fangled thing that they have changed the landscape of
the human experience

by the way, I am not a Christian, I am a solipsist

Then you're not talking to me?
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Dick C
Guest





PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2007 5:35 am    Post subject: Re: no proof against creation Reply with quote

Average Joe wrote in talk.origins

Quote:
On Mon, 28 May 2007 06:13:22 -0400, J.J. O'Shea wrote:

So now you're a theistic evolutionist, not a literalist?

I was speaking hypothetically, evolutionists think just because they have
thought up some new fangled thing that they have changed the landscape of
the human experience

by the way, I am not a Christian, I am a solipsist

However you spell it, it is pronounced druggie.
Your brain is so fried from the drugs that you have no idea of
what you are doing.

--
Dick #1349
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety."
~Benjamin Franklin

Home Page: dickcr.iwarp.com
email: dickcr@comcast.net
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


stew dean
Guest





PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2007 11:04 am    Post subject: Re: no proof against creation Reply with quote

On 28 May, 12:53, Average Joe <THIS_IS_A_SPAMT...@comcast.net> wrote:
Quote:
On Mon, 28 May 2007 04:16:09 -0700, Dustan wrote:
Well... yes, we do. Just because it doesn't disprove previous ideas
(yes, you heard me right: evolution and creation are NOT in conflict,
although I don't believe creationism is the answer), doesn't mean
evolution is a worthless piece of bull**** ever. I can only speak for
myself here: I don't try to disprove creationism. I support evolution.
There's a difference between the two.

yes, but this group is specifically an evolution versus creationism
debate and *you* have _LOST_

Two things - who is 'you' in this case. If it is ,as I suspect, non
creationists, then on what basis do you think that they have lost.
Quote:
From all I've seen one by one the pockets of resistance against
evolution and secular humanism are being eroded and contained. In

terms of acceptance of evolution the US is something 40th in the
global list, Iceland being the country with the lowest percentage of
creationists. In the US, from an outside point of view, the battle
has been taken up several notches over the last five years and the
creationists, once given respect for their religious views, are
loosing that right. it's not pretty and the level of debate is in the
'shock jock' realm but you only need to see how popular the 'Daily
Show' is to see how things are changing in the states. The creationism
vs evolution debate appears to be in line with the Red vs Blue debate
I see raging in the US.

But even more obvious than that secularists took to the street in
Turkey to defend the right of a secular government (something that
should also happen in the US after this was subverted in the 1950s -
it's one nation undivided, not one nation under god originally).
Turkey has about 50% creationists and is probably the key battle
ground for creationism - and looks like it's loosing ground there.

So with the educated western world having dropped creationism as part
of the everyman's view of life (the US being the one notable laggard)
and developing eastern countries already there it looks like the
middle east and middle America are the last places creationism is the
prominent point of view.

So what battle exactly is 'lost'?

Stew Dean
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Science Talk Forum Index -> Science Talk All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Australian Debt Consolidation Experts
medical insurance
Wedding Websites
Annunci di escort, accompagnatrici e massaggiatrici
UK Swingers Contacts
Domain Registrars Talk
mortgage quotations
Make Your Own Website
Cheap phone calls to Canada
Cleaning Service
black mold
UK Swingers Genuine Contacts Site
Janitorial Supplies
Sanitaire Vacuum Parts


Board Security

192 Attacks blocked

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group