|
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Rolf
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
JTEM
Guest
|
 Posted: Sat May 26, 2007 11:01 am Post subject: Re: Scientists still not convinced creationism true. |
 |
|
"Rolf" <r...@tele2.no> wrote:
| Quote: |
With science under massive assault from
creationists, scientists still are doing science,
ignoring claims that the Earth is only 6000
years old.
|
If they didn't, they wouldn't be "Scientists." |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
hersheyh
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun May 27, 2007 8:37 am Post subject: Re: Scientists still not convinced creationism true. |
|
|
On May 26, 4:27 pm, SJAB1958 <balf...@hotmail.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
On 26 May, 14:43, VoiceOfReason <papa_...@cybertown.com> wrote:
On May 26, 3:37 am, "Rolf" <r...@tele2.no> wrote:
With science under massive assault from creationists, scientists still are
doing science, ignoring claims that the Earth is only 6000 years old.
http://www.icdp-online.org/contenido/icdp/front_content.php?idcat=684
In other news, the scientific establishment, with its vested
interests, academic credentials and high-paid jobs on the line, still
refuse to address the evidence that the moon is made of green cheese.
it isnt made of green cheese, it may be wendsleydale or possbly
cheddar, but it goes well with crackers.
|
Well, creationism goes well in crackpots and with quackers. And most
of the arguments are pretty cheesy. In fact, every time I hear one, I
go "Cheez Wiz, that argument wasn't worth edam". |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Lee Jay
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun May 27, 2007 8:43 am Post subject: Chez Watt? (was: Re: Scientists still not convinced creation |
|
|
| Quote: |
With science under massive assault from creationists, scientists still are
doing science, ignoring claims that the Earth is only 6000 years old.
In other news, the scientific establishment, with its vested
interests, academic credentials and high-paid jobs on the line, still
refuse to address the evidence that the moon is made of green cheese.
it isnt made of green cheese, it may be wendsleydale or possbly
cheddar, but it goes well with crackers.
Well, creationism goes well in crackpots and with quackers. And most
of the arguments are pretty cheesy. In fact, every time I hear one, I
go "Cheez Wiz, that argument wasn't worth edam".
|
File this one in the cheesy arguments category. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Gregory A Greenman
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun May 27, 2007 9:12 am Post subject: Re: Scientists still not convinced creationism true. |
|
|
In article <1180200483.716283.130520
@w5g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>, Elijahovah <rschiller@wi.rr.com>
declared...
| Quote: |
On May 26, 2:37 am, "Rolf" <r...@tele2.no> wrote:
With science under massive assault from creationists, scientists still are
doing science, ignoring claims that the Earth is only 6000 years old.
http://www.icdp-online.org/contenido/icdp/front_content.php?idcat=684
The world (Earth) is not 6000 years old,
the world (man) is 6000 years old.
In fact it is important to say Adam is 6032 years old.
because religion everywhere in the world, not just bibles
have said it was 6000 in 284 AD and 500 AD and 800 AD
and 1874 AD etc.
The years 500 AD and 800 AD are from regarding Babylon
as 1900 BC adams year 3600
and 1600 BC adams year 3600
but it is 1626 BC thats adams year 2400 and 3600 to 6000.
Very evident fact that this 1200-year calendar divided in
2400 plus 3600, and as 4800 plus 1200, is world wide and
knew some where 6000 was coming. Now why would monkeys
do that. Although the confusion did begin 340 years after the Flood
in the year of the Monkey (2029 BC) and the reason the Maya
think this is before the Flood is because it is before adams year
2256 (1770 BC) which 2256 is mistaken as the Flood in 3114 BC.
And 1770 BC is mistaken for adams year 3600.
So i agree evolutionists were monkeys and still are monkeys.
But they come from us humans all born from Adam.
The next to steps are death to all of you
and resurrection back to earth.
The death is like the plagues of Egypt proving that your schools
like Egypt no longer know what you could have comprehended.
God does prove so much of your science as correct that you have
indeed learned HIS science, and then take it down hill in mockery
that you wont even be able to predict this death, nor escape it,
nor heal from it. Then resurrection when you meet cain and abel
and you meet Noah, and you meet KuFu who knows that he died
after Noah, and probably even met Noah.
So egg on your face guys, but you wit for it shoved down your
throat by God Himself, you refuse to understand before that.
|
Sadly, babel fish has no gibberish to English translator, so I
don't know what you just said. (OTOH, it does have a rather
useful English to gibberish translator. I'll use it on this
paragraph and post the results below. The translation is from
English to Dutch to French to Greek and then back to "English".)
Sad, the Babel does not have the fish brabbeltaal in the English
translator, so weet with that to you has not only said. (OTOH,
has the rather useful English s brabbeltaalvertaler. I will post
in this paragraph you use also below the results. The translation
is English njerlandais franiais grec and then to "the English.)
--
Greg
----
http://www.spencerbooksellers.com
greg00 -at- spencersoft -dot- com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Richard Clayton
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun May 27, 2007 9:32 am Post subject: Re: Chez Watt? |
|
|
Lee Jay wrote:
| Quote: |
With science under massive assault from creationists, scientists still are
doing science, ignoring claims that the Earth is only 6000 years old.
In other news, the scientific establishment, with its vested
interests, academic credentials and high-paid jobs on the line, still
refuse to address the evidence that the moon is made of green cheese.
it isnt made of green cheese, it may be wendsleydale or possbly
cheddar, but it goes well with crackers.
Well, creationism goes well in crackpots and with quackers. And most
of the arguments are pretty cheesy. In fact, every time I hear one, I
go "Cheez Wiz, that argument wasn't worth edam".
File this one in the cheesy arguments category.
|
He made a gouda point, though.
--
[The address listed is a spam trap. To reply, take off every zig.]
Richard Clayton
"Remember, always be yourself. Unless you suck." — Joss Whedon |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
John Wilkins
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun May 27, 2007 10:22 am Post subject: Re: Chez Watt? |
|
|
Richard Clayton <pockZIGetnZIGerd@verizon.net> wrote:
| Quote: |
Lee Jay wrote:
With science under massive assault from creationists, scientists
still are doing science, ignoring claims that the Earth is only 6000
years old.
In other news, the scientific establishment, with its vested
interests, academic credentials and high-paid jobs on the line, still
refuse to address the evidence that the moon is made of green cheese.
it isnt made of green cheese, it may be wendsleydale or possbly
cheddar, but it goes well with crackers.
Well, creationism goes well in crackpots and with quackers. And most
of the arguments are pretty cheesy. In fact, every time I hear one, I
go "Cheez Wiz, that argument wasn't worth edam".
File this one in the cheesy arguments category.
He made a gouda point, though.
|
Typical elitist! You blue veins always think you are butter than the
rest of us.
--
John S. Wilkins, Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Biohumanities Project
University of Queensland - Blog: scienceblogs.com/evolvingthoughts
"He used... sarcasm. He knew all the tricks, dramatic irony, metaphor,
bathos, puns, parody, litotes and... satire. He was vicious." |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Greg G.
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun May 27, 2007 11:01 am Post subject: Re: Chez Watt? |
|
|
On May 27, 2:38 am, "Tiny Bulcher" <RSGD9...@aol.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
þus cwæð John Wilkins:
Richard Clayton <pockZIGetnZIG...@verizon.net> wrote:
Lee Jay wrote:
With science under massive assault from creationists, scientists
still are doing science, ignoring claims that the Earth is only
6000 years old.
In other news, the scientific establishment, with its vested
interests, academic credentials and high-paid jobs on the line,
still refuse to address the evidence that the moon is made of
green cheese.
it isnt made of green cheese, it may be wendsleydale or possbly
cheddar, but it goes well with crackers.
Well, creationism goes well in crackpots and with quackers. And
most of the arguments are pretty cheesy. In fact, every time I
hear one, I go "Cheez Wiz, that argument wasn't worth edam".
File this one in the cheesy arguments category.
He made a gouda point, though.
Typical elitist! You blue veins always think you are butter than the
rest of us.
No more cheese puns.
|
You're always stilton at windmills.
| Quote: |
There's no call for it round here, sir.
|
It's only the most popular activity onTO! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Tiny Bulcher
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun May 27, 2007 11:01 am Post subject: Re: Chez Watt? |
|
|
þus cwæð John Wilkins:
| Quote: |
Richard Clayton <pockZIGetnZIGerd@verizon.net> wrote:
Lee Jay wrote:
With science under massive assault from creationists, scientists
still are doing science, ignoring claims that the Earth is only
6000 years old.
In other news, the scientific establishment, with its vested
interests, academic credentials and high-paid jobs on the line,
still refuse to address the evidence that the moon is made of
green cheese.
it isnt made of green cheese, it may be wendsleydale or possbly
cheddar, but it goes well with crackers.
Well, creationism goes well in crackpots and with quackers. And
most of the arguments are pretty cheesy. In fact, every time I
hear one, I go "Cheez Wiz, that argument wasn't worth edam".
File this one in the cheesy arguments category.
He made a gouda point, though.
Typical elitist! You blue veins always think you are butter than the
rest of us.
|
No more cheese puns. There's no call for it round here, sir. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Cemtech
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue May 29, 2007 8:30 am Post subject: Re: Scientists still not convinced creationism true. |
|
|
In article <1180202208.272432.52220@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
rschiller@wi.rr.com says...
| Quote: |
They better hurry with researching whatever questions they still may have -
like how the planet got its oxygen rich atmosphere. As soon as Ray gets his
Taliban regime together, grants for such nonsense will no longer be
available.
so true the devil pays the schools for the devils lies.
it is so sadthat realists have to supply the money that represents
their work. I know a gay school administrator that gathers thousands
into charities, all he does is promote other orgs to supply the money.
How sad that gay promo cash comes before school funds for
discovering the real history of Genesis. My life shames you all
because i have traced calendars and kings back to days you have
bothered
with. Historians love evolution because it doesnt bind them to a
restricted
centruy for whatever king they wish to feel they are discovering for
the
world, while these gay charity guys get the rich people taxed who go
to church
and so pay both ways hoping to get some real scholastics from it.
|
If you find an understandable and less prejudiced thought, let us know.
--
"You don't see a rabbi interpeting the New Testament,
do you?" - Lewis Black_Red, White & Screwed |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Cemtech
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue May 29, 2007 8:35 am Post subject: Re: Chez Watt? |
|
|
In article <1hysiaz.1wp6bwi32w3r4N%j.wilkins1@uq.edu.au>, j.wilkins1
@uq.edu.au says...
| Quote: |
Greg G. <ggwizz@gmail.com> wrote:
On May 27, 2:38 am, "Tiny Bulcher" <RSGD9...@aol.com> wrote:
?us cwæ? John Wilkins:
Richard Clayton <pockZIGetnZIG...@verizon.net> wrote:
Lee Jay wrote:
With science under massive assault from creationists, scientists
still are doing science, ignoring claims that the Earth is only
6000 years old.
In other news, the scientific establishment, with its vested
interests, academic credentials and high-paid jobs on the line,
still refuse to address the evidence that the moon is made of
green cheese.
it isnt made of green cheese, it may be wendsleydale or possbly
cheddar, but it goes well with crackers.
Well, creationism goes well in crackpots and with quackers. And
most of the arguments are pretty cheesy. In fact, every time I
hear one, I go "Cheez Wiz, that argument wasn't worth edam".
File this one in the cheesy arguments category.
He made a gouda point, though.
Typical elitist! You blue veins always think you are butter than the
rest of us.
No more cheese puns.
You're always stilton at windmills.
Havarti, sirrah!
There's no call for it round here, sir.
It's only the most popular activity onTO!
Justify the logic underlying that statement!
|
Well the creationist cheese is so clean. =)
--
Steve "Chris" Price
Associate Professor of Computational Aesthetics
Amish Chair of Electrical Engineering
University of Ediacara "A fine tradition since 630,000,000 BC" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
John Wilkins
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue May 29, 2007 8:48 am Post subject: Re: Chez Watt? |
|
|
Cemtech <cmtch@cox.net> wrote:
| Quote: |
In article <1hysiaz.1wp6bwi32w3r4N%j.wilkins1@uq.edu.au>, j.wilkins1
@uq.edu.au says...
Greg G. <ggwizz@gmail.com> wrote:
On May 27, 2:38 am, "Tiny Bulcher" <RSGD9...@aol.com> wrote:
?us cwæ? John Wilkins:
Richard Clayton <pockZIGetnZIG...@verizon.net> wrote:
Lee Jay wrote:
With science under massive assault from creationists, scientists
still are doing science, ignoring claims that the Earth is only
6000 years old.
In other news, the scientific establishment, with its vested
interests, academic credentials and high-paid jobs on the line,
still refuse to address the evidence that the moon is made of
green cheese.
it isnt made of green cheese, it may be wendsleydale or possbly
cheddar, but it goes well with crackers.
Well, creationism goes well in crackpots and with quackers. And
most of the arguments are pretty cheesy. In fact, every time I
hear one, I go "Cheez Wiz, that argument wasn't worth edam".
File this one in the cheesy arguments category.
He made a gouda point, though.
Typical elitist! You blue veins always think you are butter than the
rest of us.
No more cheese puns.
You're always stilton at windmills.
Havarti, sirrah!
There's no call for it round here, sir.
It's only the most popular activity onTO!
Justify the logic underlying that statement!
Well the creationist cheese is so clean. =)
|
It's certainly clean of facts.
--
John S. Wilkins, Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Biohumanities Project
University of Queensland - Blog: scienceblogs.com/evolvingthoughts
"He used... sarcasm. He knew all the tricks, dramatic irony, metaphor,
bathos, puns, parody, litotes and... satire. He was vicious." |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
