|
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Al Smith
Guest
|
 Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 4:45 am Post subject: Re: Dem Reid wants to surrender now. |
 |
|
On Apr 3, 7:20 am, "Callistus Valerius" <jazzyb...@hotmail.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
The President wants the Congress to fund the troops now. He will not
withdraw the troops. If Congress declines to fund the troops, they will
fight with what is at hand, even if it's sticks and stones. If the troops
must grow their own food, they will, so it's up to the Congress to decide
the conditions in which our troops will fight.
|
http://archive.patriotpost.us/humor/reid-pelosi-surrender.jpg |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Kavik Kang
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 4:59 am Post subject: Re: Dem Reid wants to surrender now. |
|
|
"Slo" <Slosteve@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1175619622.580863.323710@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
| Quote: |
On Apr 3, 7:20 am, "Callistus Valerius" <jazzyb...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Dem Reid wants to surrender now. More options
Ending an occupation is not surrendering. America spoke in November
and this is a democracy. We want out of Iraq.
|
No, America had an election. That's all, nothing more. This is not a
democracy, if it were you would be correct, but it is not, so you are not
correct. America is not a "Democracy", it is a "Federal Republic". There
is a big difference. A "Democracy" could never possilby work, with this
situation being a perfect example of why that is true. Now, when you say
"we" want out of Iraq who exactly are you talking about? The majority of
those you are talking about when you say that are enemy propagandists and
the useful idiots they have duped. It's a good thing we are a "Federal
Republic", because that protects us from exactly the subversion that you are
attempting.
Better luck next time. I'd suggest a different country, ours is pretty-well
setup to defeat such tactics. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Ian MacLure
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 7:00 am Post subject: Re: Dem Reid wants to surrender now. |
|
|
"Tim Crowley" <timmyturmoil@gmail.com> wrote in
news:1175614988.531660.183390@l77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com:
| Quote: |
On Apr 3, 7:20 am, "Callistus Valerius" <jazzyb...@hotmail.com> wrote:
The President wants the Congress to fund the troops now. He will not
withdraw the troops. If Congress declines to fund the troops, they will
fight with what is at hand, even if it's sticks and stones. If the troops
must grow their own food, they will, so it's up to the Congress to decide
the conditions in which our troops will fight.
k000k a d00dle do.
|
He does have a point in that Harry "Land Rush" Reid and his
band of bozos are contemplating defunding the troops.
With any luck he'll actually try.
IBM |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Callistus Valerius
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 3:31 pm Post subject: Re: Dem Reid wants to surrender now. |
|
|
That link is the whole thing in a nutshell. A picture is worth a thousand
words.
> |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Fred Oinka
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 3:34 pm Post subject: Re: Dem Reid wants to surrender now. |
|
|
On Apr 3, 10:20 am, "Callistus Valerius" <jazzyb...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
| Quote: |
The President wants the Congress to fund the troops now. He will not
withdraw the troops. If Congress declines to fund the troops, they will
fight with what is at hand, even if it's sticks and stones. If the troops
must grow their own food, they will, so it's up to the Congress to decide
the conditions in which our troops will fight.
|
So, which side of the civil war do you suppose he's on? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 3:49 pm Post subject: Re: Dem Reid wants to surrender now. |
|
|
On Apr 3, 12:55 pm, radium ant farm <s...@water.glass> wrote:
| Quote: |
kyld...@yahoo.com wrote:
The presidunce
The Bush-hating traitor.
|
The Bush-hating patriot, you simpering imbecile. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Joseph Welch
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 7:10 pm Post subject: Re: Dem Reid wants to surrender now. |
|
|
"Callistus Valerius" <jazzyboss@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:s8LQh.18168$PL.15908@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the president to
explain to us what the exit strategy is...I think it's also important for
the president to lay out a timetable as to how long they will be involved
and when they will be withdrawn."
-George W. Bush to the Houston Chronicle, April 9th, 1999
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?r103:H06OC3-756:
". . .costs to the U.S. taxpayer continue to mount. In addition to the $800
million in costs already incurred by the U.S., President Clinton has just
committed the taxpayers to another half billion dollars."
"The United States is the world's only superpower, but this does not mean we
are omnipotent, nor that our obligations are universal. Republicans believe
that President Bush's commitment to pull our forces out of Somalia should be
fulfilled."
**********************************************************************
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?r103:14:./temp/~r103lrdHmA::
"How many more times must we witness the bodies of our own soldiers being
dragged through Somalia's streets and being the center of barbaric
celebrations and cheering? How many more American soldiers have to die
before the mission is defined. "The people in my district want answers,
they want to know what the mission is, and why this is such a pressing
national security concern. And most of all, they want to know when their
sons and daughters are coming home. "
**********************************************************************
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?r103:3:./temp/~r103lrdHmA::
"We accomplished our mission, to get relief to the people of Somalia. It is
now time to leave. "
**********************************************************************
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?r103:21:./temp/~r103lrdHmA::
"When we are going to put our troops on any foreign soil, we should, in
fact, follow three military principles.
"First, we should have a clear mission statement, and we should have an end
point in which we will disengage our military. This has not happened in
Somalia, as yesterday's briefing by the Secretary proved."
Second, we should have an overwhelming military force to guarantee success
with minimum casualties. That has not happened in Somalia. In fact, we are
incrementally trying to increase our forces.
"Third, we must have a force which is commanded by a U.S. military
commander. The United Nations force in Somalia in fact tried somehow to
improve on what had been a United States success story, having military
commanders control military forces. We must have that."
"I believe that it was Claude Wist, a military theorist, who said, never
reinforce failure."
"Today we need a disengagement plan that safely guarantees our troops out of
Somalia."
**********************************************************************
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?r103:22:./temp/~r103lrdHmA::
"Get out of Somalia now."
**********************************************************************
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?r103:26:./temp/~r103lrdHmA::
"They are saying, why are we there? How long will it last? What is at peril?
Mr. President, we owe the American people the answers to these questions."
**********************************************************************
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?r103:28:./temp/~r103lrdHmA::
". . .I rise today to express my extreme concern for what I see as an
escalation of United States involvement in Somalia. In the wake of mounting
United States casualties, President Clinton has called for an increased
military presence in Somalia without clearly defining the purpose of
continued United States involvement. It is inconceivable to me how we can
continue military operations in a foreign country without a specific goal,
without clear cut rules of engagement, and without plans for eventually
ceasing operations."
". . . it is time to get American military personnel out of Somalia."
**********************************************************************
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?r103:32:./temp/~r103lrdHmA::
"The fact of the matter is, young men and women of this country should not
be put in harm's way when we have no coherent policy. As the gentleman from
California [Mr. Dornan] just said, send massive forces in, get our troops
out of there, the ones that are being held captive, level part of that
country, and bring our troops home."
**********************************************************************
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?r103:42:./temp/~r103lrdHmA::
"The current White House policy has waffled, though, on the important
issues, and we have no idea where it is leading us, on such important issues
as withdrawal, and when, on the commitment of new troops, how many, building
nations or not building nations."
". . .I ask the President to be decisive and bring our troops home safely
and immediately."
**********************************************************************
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?r103:44:./temp/~r103lrdHmA::
"We have no clearly defined plan of action in Somalia. American troops are
simply targets for discontented Somalis."
"President Clinton wants to send more troops to Somalia, but I have to ask
this question: If we do not have a plan, why do we want to send more troops
to this faraway country?"
"What national interest is served by having Americans boys killed in
Somalia?"
"Mr. Speaker, the President is old enough to know how the Nation reacted to
the Vietnam war. He should know that, without a clearly defined mission, the
American people do not want to put our soldiers in danger's way. I urge the
President to develop a plan to get our troops out of Somalia, and to do it
now."
**********************************************************************
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?r103:48:./temp/~r103lrdHmA::
"In April, Republicans passed a resolution recommending the immediate
withdraw of our troops from this operation. Instead, the President chose to
stay, with no clearly defined mission."
"We must urge the President to exhibit leadership, to come up with a plan to
get our troops out of Somalia. If we had acted timely, these American
families would not be grieving for their loved ones today."
**********************************************************************
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?r103:52:./temp/~r103lrdHmA::
". . .Mr. Speaker, American lives are being lost in Somalia because of
indecision and a lack of United States policy. The President needs to decide
and decide today to bring U.S. troops back. Do not let them languish now,
engaged in a mission of nation building in a nation which does not seem to
want a central government."
**********************************************************************
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?r103:90:./temp/~r103lrdHmA::
". . .it is time to start pulling our troops out of Somalia, and start
putting some sense back into the White House. After listening to
Secretary's Christopher and Aspin yesterday, it is clear the administration
has no real goal or no real plan, for our continued presence in Somalia.
Well, it is not worth having American soldiers give their lives just to save
face, for the Clinton administration."
"It is time to get out of Somalia. It is also time for the White House to
get its act together. Produce a plan that should have been detailed months
ago. The world today is too dangerous, and the stakes are too high."
--
____________________
George W. Bush has made the terrorists stronger, their influence wider,
their numbers larger, and their motivation to attack the U.S. and other
western interests greater. He has repeatedly abused his authority and
violated his Oath of Office by turning his back on the United States
Constitution; thereby surrendering to the terrorists by undermining American
freedoms,values, and the very foundations of our system of government.
Supporting Bush is treason.
_____________________
JW
***************
"You've done enough. Have you no sense of decency, sir, at long last? Have
you left no sense of decency?"
http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/welch-mccarthy.html
The New Face of the Republican Party
http://tinyurl.com/y2j2yr |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Nancy Reagan
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 8:19 pm Post subject: Re: Dem Reid wants to surrender now. |
|
|
On Apr 3, 10:20 am, "Callistus Valerius" <jazzyb...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
| Quote: |
The President wants the Congress to fund the troops now. He will not
withdraw the troops. If Congress declines to fund the troops, they will
fight with what is at hand, even if it's sticks and stones. If the troops
must grow their own food, they will, so it's up to the Congress to decide
the conditions in which our troops will fight.
|
If the president has changed his mind and now wants to support the
troops, why is he threatening to block funding for them?
------------------------------------------------
http://www.cafepress.com/bush_doggers?pid=2794571 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Nancy Reagan
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 8:21 pm Post subject: Re: Dem Reid wants to surrender now. |
|
|
On Apr 3, 1:19 pm, "Slo" <Slost...@gmail.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
On Apr 3, 10:12 am, radium ant farm <s...@water.glass> wrote:
Slo wrote:
Now we know we can send the bill for this
idiotic war to the Oil Companies.
What does YOUR car run on?
What gets the products to the shelves in YOUR local stores?
Of all the many bushit reasons Bush has come up with to defend this
idiotic war, he's never once said it was to guarantee the flow of oil
from Iraq. Maybe you're a WH insider, huh? LOL.
Our military defends this country and our citizenry. They're not
soldiers of fortune working for Big Oil. If they are, then Big Oil
should pony up for this war instead of we the taxpayers.
I didn't vote for Bush,
Proof positive.
You didn't answer my question. Did you vote for Bush? Huh? Are you
ashamed of how you voted? Just tell me, yes or no.
|
You don't think that starting a war, using all that tax money,
destroying the US military just to triple the value of Halliburton was
worth it? You must be a Liberal.
------------------------------------------------
http://www.cafepress.com/bush_doggers?pid=2794571 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
radium ant farm
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 8:21 pm Post subject: Re: Dem Reid wants to surrender now. |
|
|
Nancy Reagan wrote:
| Quote: |
On Apr 3, 10:20 am, "Callistus Valerius" <jazzyb...@hotmail.com
wrote:
The President wants the Congress to fund the troops now. He will not
withdraw the troops. If Congress declines to fund the troops, they will
fight with what is at hand, even if it's sticks and stones. If the troops
must grow their own food, they will, so it's up to the Congress to decide
the conditions in which our troops will fight.
If the president has changed his mind and now wants to support the
troops, why is he threatening to block funding for them?
|
Because the traitor Dems loaded the bill with a withdrawal date. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
radium ant farm
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 8:23 pm Post subject: Re: Dem Reid wants to surrender now. |
|
|
kyldltn@yahoo.com wrote:
| Quote: |
On Apr 3, 12:55 pm, radium ant farm <s...@water.glass> wrote:
kyld...@yahoo.com wrote:
The presidunce
The Bush-hating traitor.
The Bush-hating patriot,
|
The Bush-hating traitor. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
radium ant farm
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 8:33 pm Post subject: Re: Dem Reid wants to surrender now. |
|
|
Nancy Reagan wrote:
| Quote: |
You don't think that starting a war, using all that tax money,
destroying the US military just to triple the value of Halliburton
|
"Just"?
You're an insufferable paranoiac. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
SMITH29
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 8:20 am Post subject: Re: the HandCalloused McFartius-spanker asslicker tries to |
|
|
Click@Knicklas.com wrote:
| Quote: |
On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 17:09:05 GMT, radium ant farm
sugar@water.glass> wrote:
Click@Knicklas.com wrote:
All you lying scumbag presidunce
All you lieberal VERMIN!
How come ......
xxxxx |
Your work in s.p looks to be done.....
29 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
