|
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
apobetics
Guest
|
 Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 4:51 pm Post subject: Four Questions |
 |
|
Four Questions
There are four simple questions to ask the worshippers of evolution:
1. From where did the universe's original matter come ?
2. How did life begin?
3. Where are all the supposed transitional fossils between the
Precambrian and Cambrian period?
4. From where did the dinosaurs come?
As the evolutionist attempts to answer he will find that he is dealing
with "faith" and not fact in his belief system. He really has no
empirical science to back up this blind faith that accident. chance
and random changes over time brought anything like evolution into
being.
There are only two ways:
Live your way into thinking.
Think your way into living.
The evolution worshipper uses the first way because he tries to
justify his behavior without being accountable for it.
The real man uses the second because he knows he is accountable to his
Creator.
6/24/6000 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Steven J.
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 5:58 pm Post subject: Re: Four Questions |
|
|
On Jul 4, 11:51 am, apobetics <apobet...@gmail.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
Four Questions
There are four simple questions to ask the worshippers of evolution:
1. From where did the universe's original matter come ?
From WalMart. There was a sale. I'm sorry, I couldn't resist. |
Actually, the best current answer is even wilder: it's all basically
an accounting trick. The rapid inflation of space at the start of the
Big Bang created an enormous negative energy (as in, "less than zero
energy"). The first law of thermodynamics required that this be
balanced, exactly, with a corresponding increase in energy (so that
the net energy of the universe remains zero). Since matter and energy
are interconvertible, this energy eventually gave rise to a mixture of
hydrogen and helium, which in turn (due to gravity and slight
differences in the original density of matter and energy) gave rise to
stars, galaxies, and (through stellar nucleosynthesis) to heavier
elements.
| Quote: |
2. How did life begin?
This is not known in detail. Again, the best theories, based on what |
is actually observable in current chemistry, involves spontaneous
formation of RNA (which can act as both an enzyme and as a mechanism
of heredity, thus solving the classic "genes or proteins" problem) and
its enclosure in "protocells" composed of simple lipids and amino
acids. The use of actual proteins and DNA was a later development.
| Quote: |
3. Where are all the supposed transitional fossils between the
Precambrian and Cambrian period?
In the Precambrian strata: there are a number of very early chordates |
(our own phylum), jellyfish and similar organisms, and tracks of
wormlike or arthropod-like creatures, as well as soft-bodied organisms
which seem to be bilaterians of some sort, but whose exact affinities
are undetermined (although at least one seems to be a sort of soft-
bodied trilobite). There are also fossil embryos of unknown
bilaterians in the Precambrian. But in general, small, soft-bodied
organisms do not typically leave good fossils, and the Precambrian
fossil record is rather spotty.
| Quote: |
4. From where did the dinosaurs come?
Dinosaurs are derived from basal archosaurs (formerly called |
"thecodonts"), which lived in the early Triassic. Early examples
range from _Euparkeria_ (which clearly isn't a dinosaur, but shows
many dinosaur affinities) to _Lagosuchus_ (which most paleontologists
think is not a dinosaur, although a few classify it as a very
primitive dinosaur).
| Quote: |
As the evolutionist attempts to answer he will find that he is dealing
with "faith" and not fact in his belief system. He really has no
empirical science to back up this blind faith that accident. chance
and random changes over time brought anything like evolution into
being.
There does not seem to be much point in arguing over evolutionary |
theory with someone who doesn't realize (or, worse, won't admit) that:
[a] "Natural selection" is not "accident," and is an important part
of evolutionary theory, and that
[b] Scientists can have many details on parts of the puzzle even
while other parts remain poorly known.
| Quote: |
There are only two ways:
Live your way into thinking.
Think your way into living.
The evolution worshipper uses the first way because he tries to
justify his behavior without being accountable for it.
You know, of course, that this is false: no one "worships" evolution; |
it was a conclusion from the evidence. There are many Christians who
accept evolution because the alternative would be to blindly worship a
lying God Who deliberately planted evidence and then asked us not to
accept it.
| Quote: |
The real man uses the second because he knows he is accountable to his
Creator.
Arrogant little lying ignoramus, aren't you?
6/24/6000
|
4.55 billion
-- Steven J. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Ken
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 6:22 pm Post subject: Re: Four Questions........... I see it's time for Apo's dail |
|
|
| How's your group doing, ya fuckhead? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Mark Evans
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 9:07 pm Post subject: Re: Four Questions |
|
|
Four Questions
There are four simple questions to ask Apo and his ilk:
1. From where did the universe's original matter come ?
2. How did life begin?
3. Where are all the supposed original texts of your holy book?
4. From where did your god come?
As Apo attempts to answer he will find that he is dealing
with "faith" and not fact in his belief system. He really has no
empirical evidence to back up this blind faith that supernatural
forces
beyond his understanding over time brought anything like him into
being.
There are only two ways:
Thinking.
Not thinking
Apo uses the second way because he tries to
justify his behavior without being accountable for it.
Mark Evans |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Free Lunch
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 10:17 pm Post subject: Re: Four Questions |
|
|
On Fri, 4 Jul 2008 09:51:45 -0700 (PDT), apobetics <apobetics@gmail.com>
wrote in alt.talk.creationism:
| Quote: |
Four Questions
There are four simple questions to ask the worshippers of evolution:
1. From where did the universe's original matter come ?
|
What evidence is there that there was original matter?
| Quote: |
2. How did life begin?
|
Through biochemical reactions.
| Quote: |
3. Where are all the supposed transitional fossils between the
Precambrian and Cambrian period?
|
There are fossils all over the world. There are no missing time periods.
| Quote: |
4. From where did the dinosaurs come?
|
Other animals.
| Quote: |
As the evolutionist attempts to answer he will find that he is dealing
with "faith" and not fact in his belief system. He really has no
empirical science to back up this blind faith that accident. chance
and random changes over time brought anything like evolution into
being.
There are only two ways:
Live your way into thinking.
Think your way into living.
|
You don't think, so your discussion is silly.
| Quote: |
The evolution worshipper uses the first way because he tries to
justify his behavior without being accountable for it.
The real man uses the second because he knows he is accountable to his
Creator.
|
Why are you afraid to respond?
Why do you post and run?
Do you really hate God as much as your posts imply? If not, why do you
lie about the Creator? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Augray
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 05, 2008 2:29 am Post subject: Re: Four Questions |
|
|
On Fri, 4 Jul 2008 09:51:45 -0700 (PDT), apobetics
<apobetics@gmail.com> wrote in
<cff63dd6-42e4-4692-87f8-2244defa5586@w4g2000prd.googlegroups.com> :
| Quote: |
Four Questions
There are four simple questions to ask the worshippers of evolution:
1. From where did the universe's original matter come ?
2. How did life begin?
3. Where are all the supposed transitional fossils between the
Precambrian and Cambrian period?
4. From where did the dinosaurs come?
|
From archosaurs. I suggest looking up Euparkeria. It's only been known
for 100 years, so that may explain why you've never heard of it. Then
you could read up on Scleromochlus, Lagerpeton, and Marasuchus.
| Quote: |
As the evolutionist attempts to answer he will find that he is dealing
with "faith" and not fact in his belief system.
|
No, there's evidence to be had.
| Quote: |
He really has no
empirical science to back up this blind faith that accident.
|
What about the examples listed above?
| Quote: |
chance
and random changes over time brought anything like evolution into
being.
There are only two ways:
Live your way into thinking.
Think your way into living.
The evolution worshipper uses the first way because he tries to
justify his behavior without being accountable for it.
The real man uses the second because he knows he is accountable to his
Creator.
|
But that's irrelevant to the reality of evolution. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 11, 2008 10:25 pm Post subject: Re: Four Questions |
|
|
On Jul 4, 11:51 am, apobetics <apobet...@gmail.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
Four Questions
There are four simple questions to ask the worshippers of evolution:
1. From where did the universe's original matter come ?
2. How did life begin?
3. Where are all the supposed transitional fossils between the
Precambrian and Cambrian period?
4. From where did the dinosaurs come?
As the evolutionist attempts to answer he will find that he is dealing
with "faith" and not fact in his belief system. He really has no
empirical science to back up this blind faith that accident. chance
and random changes over time brought anything like evolution into
being.
There are only two ways:
Live your way into thinking.
Think your way into living.
The evolution worshipper uses the first way because he tries to
justify his behavior without being accountable for it.
The real man uses the second because he knows he is accountable to his
Creator.
6/24/6000
|
I will answer this assuming you mean the Theory of Evolution as
proposed by Darwin.
1. not part of theory
2. not part of theory
3. dunno , fossils arent really part of the theory so it doesnt really
matter
there are some specific factors that are required for fossil
formation , maybe those conditions didnt exist.
maybe some fossil bearing strata were destroyed by geological
events .
4. evolved from a ancestor . |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
