Science Talk
Science Talk
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Forums
Science Forums
Biology
Math
Astronomy
Physics
Technology
Chemistry
Social Sciences
History
Psychology
Philosophy
Sociology
Linguistics
Religious Studies
Economics
Man Woman Ethno
Ask an Expert
World Records
Society Issues
Education
People
Alternative Science
Almost a Fermat Counterexample?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Science Talk Forum Index -> Mathematics
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
jmorriss@idirect.com
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Jul 03, 2008 6:50 am    Post subject: Almost a Fermat Counterexample? Reply with quote

Is there any collection of examples that <<almost>> disprove Fermat's
last Theorem?

In other words:

Has anyone studied integers a, b, c, n, and e, such that

a^n + b^n = c^n + e, where a, b, c are positive, n > 2, and abs(e) is
really small, compared to a, b, and c?
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


hagman
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Jul 03, 2008 8:43 am    Post subject: Re: Almost a Fermat Counterexample? Reply with quote

On 3 Jul., 08:50, "jmorr...@idirect.com" <jmorr...@idirect.com> wrote:
Quote:
Is there any collection of examples that <<almost>> disprove Fermat's
last Theorem?

In other words:

Has anyone studied integers a, b, c, n, and e, such that

a^n + b^n = c^n + e, where a, b, c are positive, n > 2, and abs(e) is
really small, compared to a, b, and c?

Hello, taxi!

10^3 + 9^3 = 12^3 + 1

hagman
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


jmorriss@idirect.com
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 2:44 am    Post subject: Re: Almost a Fermat Counterexample? Reply with quote

On Jul 3, 2:50 am, "jmorr...@idirect.com" <jmorr...@idirect.com>
wrote:
Quote:
Is there any collection of examples that <<almost>> disprove Fermat's
last Theorem?

In other words:

Has anyone studied integers a, b, c, n, and e, such that

a^n + b^n = c^n + e,  where a, b, c are positive, n > 2, and abs(e) is
really small, compared to a, b, and c?

Sorry, I was not too clear... I was thinking of examples along the
lines of (courtesy of "The Simpsons"):

3987 ^ 12 + 4365 ^ 12 = 4472 ^ 12 with an error of less than 2 *
10^-11
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Guest






PostPosted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 8:25 am    Post subject: Re: Almost a Fermat Counterexample? Reply with quote

On Jul 4, 2:37 pm, Gerry Myerson <ge...@maths.mq.edi.ai.i2u4email>
wrote:
Quote:
In article
05b62d01-4456-4d7c-878d-77e192ba1...@f36g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>,





 "jmorr...@idirect.com" <jmorr...@idirect.com> wrote:
On Jul 3, 2:50 am, "jmorr...@idirect.com" <jmorr...@idirect.com
wrote:
Is there any collection of examples that <<almost>> disprove Fermat's
last Theorem?

In other words:

Has anyone studied integers a, b, c, n, and e, such that

a^n + b^n = c^n + e,  where a, b, c are positive, n > 2, and abs(e) is
really small, compared to a, b, and c?

Sorry, I was not too clear... I was thinking of examples along the
lines of (courtesy of "The Simpsons"):

3987 ^ 12 + 4365 ^ 12 = 4472 ^ 12  with an error of less than  2 *
10^-11

http://www.math.harvard.edu/~elkies/ferm.html

Tables of Fermat ``near-misses'':
approximate solutions of x^n + y^n = z^n
in integers with 0 < x <= y < z < 223 and n in [4,20]

There was once an April Fool's hoax around many maths depts claiming

that Noam Elkies had found a counterexample to the Fermat theorem. I
wonder if the triplet cited in that hoax was such a near miss. (Not
sure if Elkies had anything to do with the hoax or not.)

Paul Epstein
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Gerry Myerson
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 11:02 am    Post subject: Re: Almost a Fermat Counterexample? Reply with quote

In article
<05b62d01-4456-4d7c-878d-77e192ba112c@f36g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>,
"jmorriss@idirect.com" <jmorriss@idirect.com> wrote:

Quote:
On Jul 3, 2:50 am, "jmorr...@idirect.com" <jmorr...@idirect.com
wrote:
Is there any collection of examples that <<almost>> disprove Fermat's
last Theorem?

In other words:

Has anyone studied integers a, b, c, n, and e, such that

a^n + b^n = c^n + e,  where a, b, c are positive, n > 2, and abs(e) is
really small, compared to a, b, and c?

Sorry, I was not too clear... I was thinking of examples along the
lines of (courtesy of "The Simpsons"):

3987 ^ 12 + 4365 ^ 12 = 4472 ^ 12 with an error of less than 2 *
10^-11

http://www.math.harvard.edu/~elkies/ferm.html

Tables of Fermat ``near-misses'':
approximate solutions of x^n + y^n = z^n
in integers with 0 < x <= y < z < 223 and n in [4,20]

--
Gerry Myerson (gerry@maths.mq.edi.ai) (i -> u for email)
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Science Talk Forum Index -> Mathematics All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Australian Debt Consolidation Experts
medical insurance
Wedding
Trova Escort e Accompagnatrici sui portali di annunci (www.EscortForum.com, www.BestAnnunci.com, www.PiccoleTrasgressioni.com ...)
Free Porn
Business
cheap mortgages
Make Your Own Website
Cheap International Calls
Long island Cleaning service
toxic mold
UK Swingers Genuine Contacts Site
Dir All
ink cartridges
Webcams
bissell Parts


Board Security

172 Attacks blocked

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group