|
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
DarkMatter
Guest
|
 Posted: Tue May 06, 2008 2:37 pm Post subject: Question about Jupiter |
 |
|
| Do the gas giants like Jupiter have solid land like the earth does? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Jacob Krolo
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue May 06, 2008 8:50 pm Post subject: Re: Question about Jupiter |
|
|
"DarkMatter" <darkmatter34@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:aab41998-e600-4fde-94e1-642f665b5826@a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
| Quote: |
Do the gas giants like Jupiter have solid land like the earth does?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
--
How I understand the answer is No, but more likely they (gas giants) have
rocky/iron core.
Jacob |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
BradGuth
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun May 11, 2008 8:42 pm Post subject: Re: Question about Jupiter |
|
|
On May 6, 7:37 am, DarkMatter <darkmatte...@yahoo.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
Do the gas giants like Jupiter have solid land like the earth does?
|
Planets like Jupiter with their horrific reverse gravity or anti-
gravity core could be as much as 10%r hollow.
.. - Brad Guth |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
BradGuth
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon May 12, 2008 3:32 am Post subject: Question about Jupiter's anti-gravity core |
|
|
On May 11, 1:42 pm, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
On May 6, 7:37 am, DarkMatter <darkmatte...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Do the gas giants like Jupiter have solid land like the earth does?
|
Jupiter most likely has a rocky surface. However, planets like
Jupiter with their horrific reverse gravity or anti-gravity core could
be as much as 10%r hollow.
Perhaps this is also why our moon has such a low density core.
.. - Brad Guth |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
BradGuth
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon May 12, 2008 4:29 pm Post subject: Re: Jupiter has no surface that we know of |
|
|
On May 12, 5:44 am, "Ralph" <aj...@ncf.ca> wrote:
| Quote: |
The interesting fiction with reference to anti-gravity and reverse gravity
is a cruel joke.
Use that information for jokes and failing grades only.
For real information on the planets, you might check out some sites with
someone who knows at least a little about the subject.
Tryhttp://www.nineplanets.org/jupiter.html.
Take information from these groups with a huge dose of reality-check.
"BradGuth" <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:6cd495e1-7cc0-4a5c-abbc-36da8b2062be@24g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
On May 11, 1:42 pm, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
On May 6, 7:37 am, DarkMatter <darkmatte...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Do the gas giants like Jupiter have solid land like the earth does?
Jupiter most likely has a rocky surface. However, planets like
Jupiter with their horrific reverse gravity or anti-gravity core could
be as much as 10%r hollow.
Perhaps this is also why our moon has such a low density core.
. - Brad Guth
|
According to the regular laws of physics, the core of a given planet
or moon is clearly capable of representing less than zero gravity.
Starting at some point close to center, the gravity is not only near
zero but continually pulling you away from the actual center of
whatever planet or moon. It can't be any other way unless the core
started off as worth something of far greater density than anything
artificially or otherwise compressed.
This isn't saying that most any given planet or moon need be hollow,
just that it's technically possible.
.. - Brad Guth |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Ralph
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon May 12, 2008 5:44 pm Post subject: Jupiter has no surface that we know of |
|
|
The interesting fiction with reference to anti-gravity and reverse gravity
is a cruel joke.
Use that information for jokes and failing grades only.
For real information on the planets, you might check out some sites with
someone who knows at least a little about the subject.
Try http://www.nineplanets.org/jupiter.html.
Take information from these groups with a huge dose of reality-check.
"BradGuth" <bradguth@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:6cd495e1-7cc0-4a5c-abbc-36da8b2062be@24g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
| Quote: |
On May 11, 1:42 pm, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
On May 6, 7:37 am, DarkMatter <darkmatte...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Do the gas giants like Jupiter have solid land like the earth does?
Jupiter most likely has a rocky surface. However, planets like
Jupiter with their horrific reverse gravity or anti-gravity core could
be as much as 10%r hollow.
Perhaps this is also why our moon has such a low density core.
. - Brad Guth
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
BradGuth
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon May 12, 2008 7:55 pm Post subject: Re: Jupiter has no surface that we know of |
|
|
On May 12, 12:05 pm, "Ralph" <aj...@ncf.ca> wrote:
| Quote: |
I'm sorry to dispute, Brad Guth.
The question was a basic one. The short answer was 'no'.
Opinions on theoretical possibilities are best left to someone wanting to
discuss them.
Entertaining though it might be, I have fun enough keeping up with science
reporting through regular avenues.
"BradGuth" <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:44b5aa88-631d-46c9-b523-398b651728c6@d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
On May 12, 5:44 am, "Ralph" <aj...@ncf.ca> wrote:
The interesting fiction with reference to anti-gravity and reverse
gravity
is a cruel joke.
Use that information for jokes and failing grades only.
For real information on the planets, you might check out some sites with
someone who knows at least a little about the subject.
Tryhttp://www.nineplanets.org/jupiter.html.
Take information from these groups with a huge dose of reality-check.
"BradGuth" <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:6cd495e1-7cc0-4a5c-abbc-36da8b2062be@24g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
On May 11, 1:42 pm, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
On May 6, 7:37 am, DarkMatter <darkmatte...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Do the gas giants like Jupiter have solid land like the earth does?
Jupiter most likely has a rocky surface. However, planets like
Jupiter with their horrific reverse gravity or anti-gravity core could
be as much as 10%r hollow.
Perhaps this is also why our moon has such a low density core.
. - Brad Guth
According to the regular laws of physics, the core of a given planet
or moon is clearly capable of representing less than zero gravity.
Starting at some point close to center, the gravity is not only near
zero but continually pulling you away from the actual center of
whatever planet or moon. It can't be any other way unless the core
started off as worth something of far greater density than anything
artificially or otherwise compressed.
This isn't saying that most any given planet or moon need be hollow,
just that it's technically possible.
. - Brad Guth
|
But this anti-think-tank newsgroup/usenet is where so many folks
remain forever snookered and dumbfounded past the point of no return,
as well as where history is continually distorted and/or recorded only
as necessary, and where other boat-rocking evidence is continually
banished or excluded in order to suit your mindset status quo. It's
exactly what intellectual cartels do best.
Your mainstream or swarm Borg like mindset that's a very happy camper
with subjective science that can't be peer replicated outside of your
intellectual cartel, is the gold-standard par for your status quo
course, as representing the only newsgroup (though be it large)
mindset that's clearly afraid of their own cloak and dagger shadow.
.. - Brad Guth |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Ralph
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue May 13, 2008 12:05 am Post subject: Re: Jupiter has no surface that we know of |
|
|
I'm sorry to dispute, Brad Guth.
The question was a basic one. The short answer was 'no'.
Opinions on theoretical possibilities are best left to someone wanting to
discuss them.
Entertaining though it might be, I have fun enough keeping up with science
reporting through regular avenues.
"BradGuth" <bradguth@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:44b5aa88-631d-46c9-b523-398b651728c6@d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
| Quote: |
On May 12, 5:44 am, "Ralph" <aj...@ncf.ca> wrote:
The interesting fiction with reference to anti-gravity and reverse
gravity
is a cruel joke.
Use that information for jokes and failing grades only.
For real information on the planets, you might check out some sites with
someone who knows at least a little about the subject.
Tryhttp://www.nineplanets.org/jupiter.html.
Take information from these groups with a huge dose of reality-check.
"BradGuth" <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:6cd495e1-7cc0-4a5c-abbc-36da8b2062be@24g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
On May 11, 1:42 pm, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
On May 6, 7:37 am, DarkMatter <darkmatte...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Do the gas giants like Jupiter have solid land like the earth does?
Jupiter most likely has a rocky surface. However, planets like
Jupiter with their horrific reverse gravity or anti-gravity core could
be as much as 10%r hollow.
Perhaps this is also why our moon has such a low density core.
. - Brad Guth
According to the regular laws of physics, the core of a given planet
or moon is clearly capable of representing less than zero gravity.
Starting at some point close to center, the gravity is not only near
zero but continually pulling you away from the actual center of
whatever planet or moon. It can't be any other way unless the core
started off as worth something of far greater density than anything
artificially or otherwise compressed.
This isn't saying that most any given planet or moon need be hollow,
just that it's technically possible.
. - Brad Guth |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
BradGuth
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 1:49 pm Post subject: Question about Jupiter : Jupiter has no surface that we know |
|
|
On May 14, 4:11 am, "Ralph" <aj...@ncf.ca> wrote:
| Quote: |
Wow- I'm impresed. I'll admit, you can type, and form a sentence.
Spouting a conspiracy against your ideas, and bringing the fictional Borg
into a science topic is typical of a misunderstanding of the scientific
process.
I not only am happy that you have such "out of the box" ideas, I am pleased
that you take the time to present them to a limited public.
I do not discourage it.
Science is like that. All ideas that are subject to test, are encouraged.
Ideas that can or will have no testable proof are best left to philosophers.
Please feel free to provide some, or any proof.
If all you have is math, check how that's going with string theory. About
half the SCIENCE community that knows even a little about that, is not
ready to accept it.
...and by the way, I got over 90% in my calculus in high school.
It's given me some insight into practical ideas. (and a good recognition of
fantasy)
By all means, continue!
"BradGuth" <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:c5fc5056-bc91-4ab2-b27c-a37dea9b3e14@z72g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
On May 12, 12:05 pm, "Ralph" <aj...@ncf.ca> wrote:
I'm sorry to dispute, Brad Guth.
The question was a basic one. The short answer was 'no'.
Opinions on theoretical possibilities are best left to someone wanting to
discuss them.
Entertaining though it might be, I have fun enough keeping up with
science
reporting through regular avenues.
"BradGuth" <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:44b5aa88-631d-46c9-b523-398b651728c6@d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
On May 12, 5:44 am, "Ralph" <aj...@ncf.ca> wrote:
The interesting fiction with reference to anti-gravity and reverse
gravity
is a cruel joke.
Use that information for jokes and failing grades only.
For real information on the planets, you might check out some sites
with
someone who knows at least a little about the subject.
Tryhttp://www.nineplanets.org/jupiter.html.
Take information from these groups with a huge dose of reality-check.
"BradGuth" <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:6cd495e1-7cc0-4a5c-abbc-36da8b2062be@24g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
On May 11, 1:42 pm, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
On May 6, 7:37 am, DarkMatter <darkmatte...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Do the gas giants like Jupiter have solid land like the earth
does?
Jupiter most likely has a rocky surface. However, planets like
Jupiter with their horrific reverse gravity or anti-gravity core
could
be as much as 10%r hollow.
Perhaps this is also why our moon has such a low density core.
. - Brad Guth
According to the regular laws of physics, the core of a given planet
or moon is clearly capable of representing less than zero gravity.
Starting at some point close to center, the gravity is not only near
zero but continually pulling you away from the actual center of
whatever planet or moon. It can't be any other way unless the core
started off as worth something of far greater density than anything
artificially or otherwise compressed.
This isn't saying that most any given planet or moon need be hollow,
just that it's technically possible.
. - Brad Guth
But this anti-think-tank newsgroup/usenet is where so many folks
remain forever snookered and dumbfounded past the point of no return,
as well as where history is continually distorted and/or recorded only
as necessary, and where other boat-rocking evidence is continually
banished or excluded in order to suit your mindset status quo. It's
exactly what intellectual cartels do best.
Your mainstream or swarm Borg like mindset that's a very happy camper
with subjective science that can't be peer replicated outside of your
intellectual cartel, is the gold-standard par for your status quo
course, as representing the only newsgroup (though be it large)
mindset that's clearly afraid of their own cloak and dagger shadow.
. - Brad Guth
|
Spoken like another true DARPA brown-nosed minion.
A few good simulations using our public owned and otherwise 100%
funded supercomputers should do just fine and dandy. How about we use
that spendy new one on lone to JPL, of 2048 extremely fast CPUs.
.. - Brad Guth |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Ralph
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 4:11 pm Post subject: Re: Jupiter has no surface that we know of |
|
|
Wow- I'm impresed. I'll admit, you can type, and form a sentence.
Spouting a conspiracy against your ideas, and bringing the fictional Borg
into a science topic is typical of a misunderstanding of the scientific
process.
I not only am happy that you have such "out of the box" ideas, I am pleased
that you take the time to present them to a limited public.
I do not discourage it.
Science is like that. All ideas that are subject to test, are encouraged.
Ideas that can or will have no testable proof are best left to philosophers.
Please feel free to provide some, or any proof.
If all you have is math, check how that's going with string theory. About
half the SCIENCE community that knows even a little about that, is not
ready to accept it.
....and by the way, I got over 90% in my calculus in high school.
It's given me some insight into practical ideas. (and a good recognition of
fantasy)
By all means, continue!
"BradGuth" <bradguth@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:c5fc5056-bc91-4ab2-b27c-a37dea9b3e14@z72g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
| Quote: |
On May 12, 12:05 pm, "Ralph" <aj...@ncf.ca> wrote:
I'm sorry to dispute, Brad Guth.
The question was a basic one. The short answer was 'no'.
Opinions on theoretical possibilities are best left to someone wanting to
discuss them.
Entertaining though it might be, I have fun enough keeping up with
science
reporting through regular avenues.
"BradGuth" <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:44b5aa88-631d-46c9-b523-398b651728c6@d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
On May 12, 5:44 am, "Ralph" <aj...@ncf.ca> wrote:
The interesting fiction with reference to anti-gravity and reverse
gravity
is a cruel joke.
Use that information for jokes and failing grades only.
For real information on the planets, you might check out some sites
with
someone who knows at least a little about the subject.
Tryhttp://www.nineplanets.org/jupiter.html.
Take information from these groups with a huge dose of reality-check.
"BradGuth" <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:6cd495e1-7cc0-4a5c-abbc-36da8b2062be@24g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
On May 11, 1:42 pm, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
On May 6, 7:37 am, DarkMatter <darkmatte...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Do the gas giants like Jupiter have solid land like the earth
does?
Jupiter most likely has a rocky surface. However, planets like
Jupiter with their horrific reverse gravity or anti-gravity core
could
be as much as 10%r hollow.
Perhaps this is also why our moon has such a low density core.
. - Brad Guth
According to the regular laws of physics, the core of a given planet
or moon is clearly capable of representing less than zero gravity.
Starting at some point close to center, the gravity is not only near
zero but continually pulling you away from the actual center of
whatever planet or moon. It can't be any other way unless the core
started off as worth something of far greater density than anything
artificially or otherwise compressed.
This isn't saying that most any given planet or moon need be hollow,
just that it's technically possible.
. - Brad Guth
But this anti-think-tank newsgroup/usenet is where so many folks
remain forever snookered and dumbfounded past the point of no return,
as well as where history is continually distorted and/or recorded only
as necessary, and where other boat-rocking evidence is continually
banished or excluded in order to suit your mindset status quo. It's
exactly what intellectual cartels do best.
Your mainstream or swarm Borg like mindset that's a very happy camper
with subjective science that can't be peer replicated outside of your
intellectual cartel, is the gold-standard par for your status quo
course, as representing the only newsgroup (though be it large)
mindset that's clearly afraid of their own cloak and dagger shadow.
. - Brad Guth |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
BradGuth
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 5:57 pm Post subject: Re: Question about Jupiter : Jupiter has no surface that we |
|
|
So, you're giving me the authority and thus access to running a few
thousand complex simulations on the 2048 CPU supercomputer at JPL?
When is the bus leaving town (as headed for JPL), that I'm supposed to
be on. Or, is there merely an internet access granted version of that
supercomputer?
. - Brad Guth
Ralph wrote:
| Quote: |
Feel free to invest your time and money as you wish on any computer you
wish.
Also feel free to fantasize as you wish, and name-call like a six year old.
Also feel free to never admit you're wrong. Science does.
"BradGuth" <bradguth@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:dd446595-ace9-4d5e-903a-3fc9dfc5a997@a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
On May 14, 4:11 am, "Ralph" <aj...@ncf.ca> wrote:
Wow- I'm impresed. I'll admit, you can type, and form a sentence.
Spouting a conspiracy against your ideas, and bringing the fictional Borg
into a science topic is typical of a misunderstanding of the scientific
process.
I not only am happy that you have such "out of the box" ideas, I am
pleased
that you take the time to present them to a limited public.
I do not discourage it.
Science is like that. All ideas that are subject to test, are
encouraged.
Ideas that can or will have no testable proof are best left to
philosophers.
Please feel free to provide some, or any proof.
If all you have is math, check how that's going with string theory.
About
half the SCIENCE community that knows even a little about that, is not
ready to accept it.
...and by the way, I got over 90% in my calculus in high school.
It's given me some insight into practical ideas. (and a good recognition
of
fantasy)
By all means, continue!
"BradGuth" <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:c5fc5056-bc91-4ab2-b27c-a37dea9b3e14@z72g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
On May 12, 12:05 pm, "Ralph" <aj...@ncf.ca> wrote:
I'm sorry to dispute, Brad Guth.
The question was a basic one. The short answer was 'no'.
Opinions on theoretical possibilities are best left to someone wanting
to
discuss them.
Entertaining though it might be, I have fun enough keeping up with
science
reporting through regular avenues.
"BradGuth" <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:44b5aa88-631d-46c9-b523-398b651728c6@d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
On May 12, 5:44 am, "Ralph" <aj...@ncf.ca> wrote:
The interesting fiction with reference to anti-gravity and reverse
gravity
is a cruel joke.
Use that information for jokes and failing grades only.
For real information on the planets, you might check out some sites
with
someone who knows at least a little about the subject.
Tryhttp://www.nineplanets.org/jupiter.html.
Take information from these groups with a huge dose of
reality-check.
"BradGuth" <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:6cd495e1-7cc0-4a5c-abbc-36da8b2062be@24g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
On May 11, 1:42 pm, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
On May 6, 7:37 am, DarkMatter <darkmatte...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Do the gas giants like Jupiter have solid land like the earth
does?
Jupiter most likely has a rocky surface. However, planets like
Jupiter with their horrific reverse gravity or anti-gravity core
could
be as much as 10%r hollow.
Perhaps this is also why our moon has such a low density core.
. - Brad Guth
According to the regular laws of physics, the core of a given planet
or moon is clearly capable of representing less than zero gravity.
Starting at some point close to center, the gravity is not only near
zero but continually pulling you away from the actual center of
whatever planet or moon. It can't be any other way unless the core
started off as worth something of far greater density than anything
artificially or otherwise compressed.
This isn't saying that most any given planet or moon need be hollow,
just that it's technically possible.
. - Brad Guth
But this anti-think-tank newsgroup/usenet is where so many folks
remain forever snookered and dumbfounded past the point of no return,
as well as where history is continually distorted and/or recorded only
as necessary, and where other boat-rocking evidence is continually
banished or excluded in order to suit your mindset status quo. It's
exactly what intellectual cartels do best.
Your mainstream or swarm Borg like mindset that's a very happy camper
with subjective science that can't be peer replicated outside of your
intellectual cartel, is the gold-standard par for your status quo
course, as representing the only newsgroup (though be it large)
mindset that's clearly afraid of their own cloak and dagger shadow.
. - Brad Guth
Spoken like another true DARPA brown-nosed minion.
A few good simulations using our public owned and otherwise 100%
funded supercomputers should do just fine and dandy. How about we use
that spendy new one on lone to JPL, of 2048 extremely fast CPUs.
. - Brad Guth |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Ralph
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 7:48 pm Post subject: Re: Question about Jupiter : Jupiter has no surface that we |
|
|
Feel free to invest your time and money as you wish on any computer you
wish.
Also feel free to fantasize as you wish, and name-call like a six year old.
Also feel free to never admit you're wrong. Science does.
"BradGuth" <bradguth@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:dd446595-ace9-4d5e-903a-3fc9dfc5a997@a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
| Quote: |
On May 14, 4:11 am, "Ralph" <aj...@ncf.ca> wrote:
Wow- I'm impresed. I'll admit, you can type, and form a sentence.
Spouting a conspiracy against your ideas, and bringing the fictional Borg
into a science topic is typical of a misunderstanding of the scientific
process.
I not only am happy that you have such "out of the box" ideas, I am
pleased
that you take the time to present them to a limited public.
I do not discourage it.
Science is like that. All ideas that are subject to test, are
encouraged.
Ideas that can or will have no testable proof are best left to
philosophers.
Please feel free to provide some, or any proof.
If all you have is math, check how that's going with string theory.
About
half the SCIENCE community that knows even a little about that, is not
ready to accept it.
...and by the way, I got over 90% in my calculus in high school.
It's given me some insight into practical ideas. (and a good recognition
of
fantasy)
By all means, continue!
"BradGuth" <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:c5fc5056-bc91-4ab2-b27c-a37dea9b3e14@z72g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
On May 12, 12:05 pm, "Ralph" <aj...@ncf.ca> wrote:
I'm sorry to dispute, Brad Guth.
The question was a basic one. The short answer was 'no'.
Opinions on theoretical possibilities are best left to someone wanting
to
discuss them.
Entertaining though it might be, I have fun enough keeping up with
science
reporting through regular avenues.
"BradGuth" <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:44b5aa88-631d-46c9-b523-398b651728c6@d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
On May 12, 5:44 am, "Ralph" <aj...@ncf.ca> wrote:
The interesting fiction with reference to anti-gravity and reverse
gravity
is a cruel joke.
Use that information for jokes and failing grades only.
For real information on the planets, you might check out some sites
with
someone who knows at least a little about the subject.
Tryhttp://www.nineplanets.org/jupiter.html.
Take information from these groups with a huge dose of
reality-check.
"BradGuth" <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:6cd495e1-7cc0-4a5c-abbc-36da8b2062be@24g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
On May 11, 1:42 pm, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
On May 6, 7:37 am, DarkMatter <darkmatte...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Do the gas giants like Jupiter have solid land like the earth
does?
Jupiter most likely has a rocky surface. However, planets like
Jupiter with their horrific reverse gravity or anti-gravity core
could
be as much as 10%r hollow.
Perhaps this is also why our moon has such a low density core.
. - Brad Guth
According to the regular laws of physics, the core of a given planet
or moon is clearly capable of representing less than zero gravity.
Starting at some point close to center, the gravity is not only near
zero but continually pulling you away from the actual center of
whatever planet or moon. It can't be any other way unless the core
started off as worth something of far greater density than anything
artificially or otherwise compressed.
This isn't saying that most any given planet or moon need be hollow,
just that it's technically possible.
. - Brad Guth
But this anti-think-tank newsgroup/usenet is where so many folks
remain forever snookered and dumbfounded past the point of no return,
as well as where history is continually distorted and/or recorded only
as necessary, and where other boat-rocking evidence is continually
banished or excluded in order to suit your mindset status quo. It's
exactly what intellectual cartels do best.
Your mainstream or swarm Borg like mindset that's a very happy camper
with subjective science that can't be peer replicated outside of your
intellectual cartel, is the gold-standard par for your status quo
course, as representing the only newsgroup (though be it large)
mindset that's clearly afraid of their own cloak and dagger shadow.
. - Brad Guth
Spoken like another true DARPA brown-nosed minion.
A few good simulations using our public owned and otherwise 100%
funded supercomputers should do just fine and dandy. How about we use
that spendy new one on lone to JPL, of 2048 extremely fast CPUs.
. - Brad Guth |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
BradGuth
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 11:22 pm Post subject: Re: Question about Jupiter : Jupiter has no surface that we |
|
|
Figured as much, coming from such a brown-nosed clown like yourself.
.. - Brad Guth
Ralph wrote:
| Quote: |
Since I have no authority over you, your fantasies, JPL, or any
supercomputer,
- sure-
hop on a bus.
I think it leaves at 6.
"BradGuth" <bradguth@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:c2fc95bd-4e0e-4939-bae7-d32bb0840841@f36g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
So, you're giving me the authority and thus access to running a few
thousand complex simulations on the 2048 CPU supercomputer at JPL?
When is the bus leaving town (as headed for JPL), that I'm supposed to
be on. Or, is there merely an internet access granted version of that
supercomputer?
. - Brad Guth
Ralph wrote:
Feel free to invest your time and money as you wish on any computer you
wish.
Also feel free to fantasize as you wish, and name-call like a six year
old.
Also feel free to never admit you're wrong. Science does.
"BradGuth" <bradguth@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:dd446595-ace9-4d5e-903a-3fc9dfc5a997@a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
On May 14, 4:11 am, "Ralph" <aj...@ncf.ca> wrote:
Wow- I'm impresed. I'll admit, you can type, and form a sentence.
Spouting a conspiracy against your ideas, and bringing the fictional
Borg
into a science topic is typical of a misunderstanding of the
scientific
process.
I not only am happy that you have such "out of the box" ideas, I am
pleased
that you take the time to present them to a limited public.
I do not discourage it.
Science is like that. All ideas that are subject to test, are
encouraged.
Ideas that can or will have no testable proof are best left to
philosophers.
Please feel free to provide some, or any proof.
If all you have is math, check how that's going with string theory.
About
half the SCIENCE community that knows even a little about that, is
not
ready to accept it.
...and by the way, I got over 90% in my calculus in high school.
It's given me some insight into practical ideas. (and a good
recognition
of
fantasy)
By all means, continue!
"BradGuth" <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:c5fc5056-bc91-4ab2-b27c-a37dea9b3e14@z72g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
On May 12, 12:05 pm, "Ralph" <aj...@ncf.ca> wrote:
I'm sorry to dispute, Brad Guth.
The question was a basic one. The short answer was 'no'.
Opinions on theoretical possibilities are best left to someone
wanting
to
discuss them.
Entertaining though it might be, I have fun enough keeping up with
science
reporting through regular avenues.
"BradGuth" <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:44b5aa88-631d-46c9-b523-398b651728c6@d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
On May 12, 5:44 am, "Ralph" <aj...@ncf.ca> wrote:
The interesting fiction with reference to anti-gravity and
reverse
gravity
is a cruel joke.
Use that information for jokes and failing grades only.
For real information on the planets, you might check out some
sites
with
someone who knows at least a little about the subject.
Tryhttp://www.nineplanets.org/jupiter.html.
Take information from these groups with a huge dose of
reality-check.
"BradGuth" <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:6cd495e1-7cc0-4a5c-abbc-36da8b2062be@24g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
On May 11, 1:42 pm, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
On May 6, 7:37 am, DarkMatter <darkmatte...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Do the gas giants like Jupiter have solid land like the
earth
does?
Jupiter most likely has a rocky surface. However, planets
like
Jupiter with their horrific reverse gravity or anti-gravity
core
could
be as much as 10%r hollow.
Perhaps this is also why our moon has such a low density core.
. - Brad Guth
According to the regular laws of physics, the core of a given
planet
or moon is clearly capable of representing less than zero
gravity.
Starting at some point close to center, the gravity is not only
near
zero but continually pulling you away from the actual center of
whatever planet or moon. It can't be any other way unless the
core
started off as worth something of far greater density than
anything
artificially or otherwise compressed.
This isn't saying that most any given planet or moon need be
hollow,
just that it's technically possible.
. - Brad Guth
But this anti-think-tank newsgroup/usenet is where so many folks
remain forever snookered and dumbfounded past the point of no
return,
as well as where history is continually distorted and/or recorded
only
as necessary, and where other boat-rocking evidence is continually
banished or excluded in order to suit your mindset status quo. It's
exactly what intellectual cartels do best.
Your mainstream or swarm Borg like mindset that's a very happy
camper
with subjective science that can't be peer replicated outside of
your
intellectual cartel, is the gold-standard par for your status quo
course, as representing the only newsgroup (though be it large)
mindset that's clearly afraid of their own cloak and dagger shadow.
. - Brad Guth
Spoken like another true DARPA brown-nosed minion.
A few good simulations using our public owned and otherwise 100%
funded supercomputers should do just fine and dandy. How about we use
that spendy new one on lone to JPL, of 2048 extremely fast CPUs.
. - Brad Guth |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Ralph
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 3:18 am Post subject: Re: Question about Jupiter : Jupiter has no surface that we |
|
|
Since I have no authority over you, your fantasies, JPL, or any
supercomputer,
- sure-
hop on a bus.
I think it leaves at 6.
"BradGuth" <bradguth@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:c2fc95bd-4e0e-4939-bae7-d32bb0840841@f36g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
| Quote: |
So, you're giving me the authority and thus access to running a few
thousand complex simulations on the 2048 CPU supercomputer at JPL?
When is the bus leaving town (as headed for JPL), that I'm supposed to
be on. Or, is there merely an internet access granted version of that
supercomputer?
. - Brad Guth
Ralph wrote:
Feel free to invest your time and money as you wish on any computer you
wish.
Also feel free to fantasize as you wish, and name-call like a six year
old.
Also feel free to never admit you're wrong. Science does.
"BradGuth" <bradguth@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:dd446595-ace9-4d5e-903a-3fc9dfc5a997@a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
On May 14, 4:11 am, "Ralph" <aj...@ncf.ca> wrote:
Wow- I'm impresed. I'll admit, you can type, and form a sentence.
Spouting a conspiracy against your ideas, and bringing the fictional
Borg
into a science topic is typical of a misunderstanding of the
scientific
process.
I not only am happy that you have such "out of the box" ideas, I am
pleased
that you take the time to present them to a limited public.
I do not discourage it.
Science is like that. All ideas that are subject to test, are
encouraged.
Ideas that can or will have no testable proof are best left to
philosophers.
Please feel free to provide some, or any proof.
If all you have is math, check how that's going with string theory.
About
half the SCIENCE community that knows even a little about that, is
not
ready to accept it.
...and by the way, I got over 90% in my calculus in high school.
It's given me some insight into practical ideas. (and a good
recognition
of
fantasy)
By all means, continue!
"BradGuth" <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:c5fc5056-bc91-4ab2-b27c-a37dea9b3e14@z72g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
On May 12, 12:05 pm, "Ralph" <aj...@ncf.ca> wrote:
I'm sorry to dispute, Brad Guth.
The question was a basic one. The short answer was 'no'.
Opinions on theoretical possibilities are best left to someone
wanting
to
discuss them.
Entertaining though it might be, I have fun enough keeping up with
science
reporting through regular avenues.
"BradGuth" <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:44b5aa88-631d-46c9-b523-398b651728c6@d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
On May 12, 5:44 am, "Ralph" <aj...@ncf.ca> wrote:
The interesting fiction with reference to anti-gravity and
reverse
gravity
is a cruel joke.
Use that information for jokes and failing grades only.
For real information on the planets, you might check out some
sites
with
someone who knows at least a little about the subject.
Tryhttp://www.nineplanets.org/jupiter.html.
Take information from these groups with a huge dose of
reality-check.
"BradGuth" <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:6cd495e1-7cc0-4a5c-abbc-36da8b2062be@24g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
On May 11, 1:42 pm, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
On May 6, 7:37 am, DarkMatter <darkmatte...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Do the gas giants like Jupiter have solid land like the
earth
does?
Jupiter most likely has a rocky surface. However, planets
like
Jupiter with their horrific reverse gravity or anti-gravity
core
could
be as much as 10%r hollow.
Perhaps this is also why our moon has such a low density core.
. - Brad Guth
According to the regular laws of physics, the core of a given
planet
or moon is clearly capable of representing less than zero
gravity.
Starting at some point close to center, the gravity is not only
near
zero but continually pulling you away from the actual center of
whatever planet or moon. It can't be any other way unless the
core
started off as worth something of far greater density than
anything
artificially or otherwise compressed.
This isn't saying that most any given planet or moon need be
hollow,
just that it's technically possible.
. - Brad Guth
But this anti-think-tank newsgroup/usenet is where so many folks
remain forever snookered and dumbfounded past the point of no
return,
as well as where history is continually distorted and/or recorded
only
as necessary, and where other boat-rocking evidence is continually
banished or excluded in order to suit your mindset status quo. It's
exactly what intellectual cartels do best.
Your mainstream or swarm Borg like mindset that's a very happy
camper
with subjective science that can't be peer replicated outside of
your
intellectual cartel, is the gold-standard par for your status quo
course, as representing the only newsgroup (though be it large)
mindset that's clearly afraid of their own cloak and dagger shadow.
. - Brad Guth
Spoken like another true DARPA brown-nosed minion.
A few good simulations using our public owned and otherwise 100%
funded supercomputers should do just fine and dandy. How about we use
that spendy new one on lone to JPL, of 2048 extremely fast CPUs.
. - Brad Guth |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Ralph
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 10:11 pm Post subject: Re: Question about Jupiter : Jupiter has no surface that we |
|
|
Wow- you really know how to show your (lack of) class.
- I think I'll go speak with my two-year-old great-nephew.
He's much more polite. (and probably better educated)
Have fun with your flaming and fantasies!
"BradGuth" <bradguth@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:7c2a9aa6-9fe7-4af2-9d7b-bb8cc28cb641@24g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
| Quote: |
Figured as much, coming from such a brown-nosed clown like yourself.
. - Brad Guth
Ralph wrote:
Since I have no authority over you, your fantasies, JPL, or any
supercomputer,
- sure-
hop on a bus.
I think it leaves at 6.
"BradGuth" <bradguth@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:c2fc95bd-4e0e-4939-bae7-d32bb0840841@f36g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
So, you're giving me the authority and thus access to running a few
thousand complex simulations on the 2048 CPU supercomputer at JPL?
When is the bus leaving town (as headed for JPL), that I'm supposed to
be on. Or, is there merely an internet access granted version of that
supercomputer?
. - Brad Guth
Ralph wrote:
Feel free to invest your time and money as you wish on any computer
you
wish.
Also feel free to fantasize as you wish, and name-call like a six year
old.
Also feel free to never admit you're wrong. Science does.
"BradGuth" <bradguth@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:dd446595-ace9-4d5e-903a-3fc9dfc5a997@a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
On May 14, 4:11 am, "Ralph" <aj...@ncf.ca> wrote:
Wow- I'm impresed. I'll admit, you can type, and form a sentence.
Spouting a conspiracy against your ideas, and bringing the
fictional
Borg
into a science topic is typical of a misunderstanding of the
scientific
process.
I not only am happy that you have such "out of the box" ideas, I am
pleased
that you take the time to present them to a limited public.
I do not discourage it.
Science is like that. All ideas that are subject to test, are
encouraged.
Ideas that can or will have no testable proof are best left to
philosophers.
Please feel free to provide some, or any proof.
If all you have is math, check how that's going with string theory.
About
half the SCIENCE community that knows even a little about that, is
not
ready to accept it.
...and by the way, I got over 90% in my calculus in high school.
It's given me some insight into practical ideas. (and a good
recognition
of
fantasy)
By all means, continue!
"BradGuth" <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:c5fc5056-bc91-4ab2-b27c-a37dea9b3e14@z72g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
On May 12, 12:05 pm, "Ralph" <aj...@ncf.ca> wrote:
I'm sorry to dispute, Brad Guth.
The question was a basic one. The short answer was 'no'.
Opinions on theoretical possibilities are best left to someone
wanting
to
discuss them.
Entertaining though it might be, I have fun enough keeping up
with
science
reporting through regular avenues.
"BradGuth" <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:44b5aa88-631d-46c9-b523-398b651728c6@d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
On May 12, 5:44 am, "Ralph" <aj...@ncf.ca> wrote:
The interesting fiction with reference to anti-gravity and
reverse
gravity
is a cruel joke.
Use that information for jokes and failing grades only.
For real information on the planets, you might check out some
sites
with
someone who knows at least a little about the subject.
Tryhttp://www.nineplanets.org/jupiter.html.
Take information from these groups with a huge dose of
reality-check.
"BradGuth" <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:6cd495e1-7cc0-4a5c-abbc-36da8b2062be@24g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
On May 11, 1:42 pm, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
On May 6, 7:37 am, DarkMatter <darkmatte...@yahoo.com
wrote:
Do the gas giants like Jupiter have solid land like the
earth
does?
Jupiter most likely has a rocky surface. However, planets
like
Jupiter with their horrific reverse gravity or anti-gravity
core
could
be as much as 10%r hollow.
Perhaps this is also why our moon has such a low density
core.
. - Brad Guth
According to the regular laws of physics, the core of a given
planet
or moon is clearly capable of representing less than zero
gravity.
Starting at some point close to center, the gravity is not
only
near
zero but continually pulling you away from the actual center
of
whatever planet or moon. It can't be any other way unless the
core
started off as worth something of far greater density than
anything
artificially or otherwise compressed.
This isn't saying that most any given planet or moon need be
hollow,
just that it's technically possible.
. - Brad Guth
But this anti-think-tank newsgroup/usenet is where so many folks
remain forever snookered and dumbfounded past the point of no
return,
as well as where history is continually distorted and/or recorded
only
as necessary, and where other boat-rocking evidence is
continually
banished or excluded in order to suit your mindset status quo.
It's
exactly what intellectual cartels do best.
Your mainstream or swarm Borg like mindset that's a very happy
camper
with subjective science that can't be peer replicated outside of
your
intellectual cartel, is the gold-standard par for your status quo
course, as representing the only newsgroup (though be it large)
mindset that's clearly afraid of their own cloak and dagger
shadow.
. - Brad Guth
Spoken like another true DARPA brown-nosed minion.
A few good simulations using our public owned and otherwise 100%
funded supercomputers should do just fine and dandy. How about we
use
that spendy new one on lone to JPL, of 2048 extremely fast CPUs.
. - Brad Guth |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
